Fw: [HAL838] Fwd: Webster G. Tar pley’s attack on Obama
- Webster G. Tarpley's mistake is generalizing from party faithful behavior in primaries to general election behavior -- the behavior of two different populations with two different sets of political opinion characteristics.Obama will carry California if he makes the nomination. I am predicting a Clinton upset. Obama would easily beat McCain -- and Tarpley couldn't be mor wrong than whan he tells us the primaries will be an indication of how the general election goes.Another thing -- the only wind in McCain's sails is fear of another Clinton presidency.And guess what? Bob Bowman would win against any combination of the three in a general election with him on the ballot.
----- Original Message -----
From: Auveline Robinson
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 9:14 PM
Subject: [HAL838] Fwd: Webster G. Tarpley’s attack on Obama
ATTENTION: THIS IS AN IMPORTANT ANALYSIS ON THE OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN AND BID. There is a pdf file with the total of Tarpley's book, but it is 294 pages and can be bought from Amazon. Auveline
Date: Jun 2, 2008 7:48 PM
Subject:Webster G. Tarpley's attack on Obama
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 02:10:59 +1000 (EST) Forwarded from: Guy Dunbar
<guy_dunbar4@... <mailto:guy_dunbar4@...> >
Barack Obama pdf book download
Obama - The Postmodern Coup: Making of a Manchurian Candidate
by Webster Griffin Tarpley, Bruce Marshall and Jonathan Mowat (Paperback
- Jun 2, 2008)
Obama's Afghan Dilemma (Spokesman)
by Ken Coates, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Barack Obama
(Paperback - April 1, 2008)
The brains behind Obama: Zbigniew Brzezinski
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The money behind Brzezinski: David Rockefeller
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Barack Obama is a deeply troubled personality, the megalomaniac front
man for a postmodern coup by the intelligence agencies, using fake
polls, mobs of swarming adolescents, super-rich contributors, and
orchestrated media hysteria to short-circuit normal politics and seize
Obama comes from the orbit of the Ford Foundation, and has never won
public office in a contested election. His guru and controller is
Zbigniew Brzezinski, the deranged revanchist and Russia-hater who
dominated the catastrophic Carter presidency 30 years ago. All
indications are that Brzezinski recruited Obama at Columbia University a
quarter century ago. Trilateral Commission co-founder Brzezinski wants a
global showdown with Russia and China far more dangerous for the United
States than the Bush-Cheney Iraq adventure.
Obama's economics are pure Skull & Bones/Chicago school austerity and
sacrifice for American working families, all designed to bail out the
bankrupt Wall Street elitist financiers who own Obama. Obama's lemming
legions and Kool-Aid cult candidacy hearken back to Italy in 1919-1922,
and raise the question of postmodern fascism in the United States today.
Obama is a recipe for a world tragedy. No American voter can afford to
ignore the lessons contained in this book.
About the Author
Webster Griffin Tarpley (Massachusetts 1946) is an intelligence expert
and historian who has been studying and exposing covert operations for
over thirty years. He is the author of George Bush: The Unauthorized
Biography (1992) and 9/11 Synthetic Terror (2005). He has appeared on
C-SPAN, CNN, Fox News, and many more.
(2) Tarpley backs Hillary - no mention of the Jewish lobby backing her
TARPLEY-WHY OBAMA'S A LOSER, PRELUDE TO MCCAIN DISASTER
Posted By: J
Date: Friday, 8 February 2008, 1:47 p.m.
Why Obama Is A Sure Loser
And A Prelude To The McCain-Lieberman Disaster
By Webster Tarpley
Any Democratic candidate who cannot win California and New York should
probably call it a day. That applies to Obama, but his situation is even
worse. The voter pool for the Democratic primaries is notoriously not
typical of the broader US population. The Democratic primaries have been
skewed for decades by the presence of large numbers of upper-middle
class elitists concerned about environmentalism, race and gender quotas,
balanced budgets, good government, corruption, gridlock, excessive
partisanship, and related issues. They are not interested in the minimum
wage, trade union rights, stopping home foreclosures, and other kitchen
table concerns of the less well off. In this year's Super Tuesday, it
was estimated that about 56% of the voters on the Democratic Party side
had been to college ? about twice the level for the population as a
whole. Yet, even with this voter pool, Obama could not win a single
Electoral College megastate vital for any Democratic candidate, with the
sole exception of his own home base of Illinois.
OBAMA TROUNCED IN THE MEGA-STATES
The list of states captured by Obama on Feb. 5 is largely a joke, except
for Illinois and a couple of others. He proudly lists Alaska, Idaho,
Kansas, North Dakota, and Utah. What do these states have in common?
They are states which a Democrat could never win in a general election.
Under the Electoral College system, Democratic votes in these states are
worthless ? they will be thrown away. How many people are there in the
Alaska Democratic Party? The caucus turnout seems to have been below
10,000 people. Idaho is one of the most reactionary states ? the
Democratic Party there could meet in a phone booth. The same goes for
Utah. Delaware is a perfect state for Obama ? rich Volvo-driving,
chablis and brie elitists in the Philadelphia suburbs, but it does not
look like America. Colorado is another Obama state where the well-off
suburban voter can be decisive in a Democratic primary. True, Obama won
Connecticut, which has some union voters, but it looks like Greenwich,
Cos Cob, and Yale carried the day. Missouri might fall to Clinton on a
recount; in any case, the race was very close. Minnesota is a special
case because of the Democrat Farmer-Labor Party; this was in any case a
state that went for Mondale, for various reasons ? not a good
To win an election, a Democrat must win the Electoral College megastates
to get to the 270 plus electoral votes needed to eject the GOP from the
White House. Mrs. Clinton carried these states convincingly, starting
with California, where all of Obama's money could not save him.
California is so huge, so crucial, and so much a symbol of America's
future in the Pacific century, that the argument could well end here. A
Democrat who cannot win California has no hope of entering the White
House. But there is much more.
RICH ELITISTS FOR OBAMA
The Obama campaign looks very much like the past campaigns of Howard
Dean, Gary Hart, Paul Tsongas, Bill Bradley, and other losers of the
past. He appeals to wealthy elitists, and therefore has a fundraising
base. He can turn out small numbers of dedicated liberal activists for
caucuses, as we have seen in Iowa. He can use the Internet to get money
in the same way that Howard Dean did. He enjoys the benefits of a
collective media swoon, and the systematic fawning of the media elites.
But none of this adds up to the ability to win a general election.
Obama lost Massachusetts, in spite of the effusions of the politically
decadent Kennedy clan. Despite media hype, he lost New Jersey. He lost
border states like Tennessee and Oklahoma that a Democrat might win.
Mrs. Clinton had already won megastates Florida and Michigan. She is
likely to win in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas. What can we do with a
Democratic candidate who cannot win California, New York, Texas, New
Jersey, Massachusetts, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Florida ? cannot win
even the skewed Democratic primary voters of these critical states? The
question answers itself. As sociologist Fabio Rojas has noted: "The
Obama campaign assumed that winning big states, aside from Illinois, was
simply impossible. [Obama's] strengths do not undermine Hillary's single
most powerful asset: rock solid support among the white women, retirees,
and unionists who make up the majority of the Democratic base. There is
nearly nothing that Obama can say to sway those voters.Obama can
continue to win his kind of state (caucuses, low union, small to medium
size, heavily Affirmative Action) and have the money to continue till
the end, but he can't deliver a knockout punch by winning in California,
NY, NJ, Texas, Florida, Ohio or PA." Obama's campaign depends on
creating the illusion of success. When there is no real success
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.24.4/1478 - Release Date: 6/2/2008 7:12 AM