Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

NYT glowing review of Amanda Ripley's new book

Expand Messages
  • Leonie Haimson
    The NYTimes in its wisdowm assigned the review --and a featured podcast --  of the new book by New America Foundation fellow Amanda Ripley to another NAF
    Message 1 of 1 , Aug 24, 2013
      The NYTimes in its wisdowm assigned the review --and a featured podcast --  of the new book by New America Foundation fellow Amanda Ripley to another NAF fellow -- Annie Murphy Paul. 

      This is a clear conflict of interest and should be protested to NYT Ombudsperson Margaret Sullivan by tweeting @sulliview or email her at public@... 

      podcast here: http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/23/book-review-podcast-amanda-ripleys-the-smartest-kids-in-the-world/

      review: http://shar.es/z5xWl 

      This is predictably a glowing review of a very controversial thesis in which Ripley argues the  Korean ed system --, in which students sleep in class b/c they have spent hours after school in expensive "cram schools" that families spend 40% of their disposable income on -- and which causes huge stress on kids, is better than the US system because all this competition makes Korean kids stronger and more able to compete in a global economy.

      I guess she doesn't  count all those Korean families who choose to uproot themselves and move to the US to escape the awful educational system, or the kids who committed suicide in the process.  here is an excerpt from the NYT review:

      Academic pressure there is out of control, and government officials and school administrators know it — but they are no match for ambitious students and their parents, who understand that passing the country’s stringent graduation exam is the key to a successful, prosperous life.

      Ripley is cleareyed [sic] about the serious drawbacks of this system: “In Korea, the hamster wheel created as many problems as it solved.” Still, if she had to choose between “the hamster wheel and the moon bounce that characterized many schools in the United States,” she would reluctantly pick the hamster wheel: “It was relentless and excessive, yes, but it also felt more honest. Kids in hamster-wheel countries knew what it felt like to grapple with complex ideas and think outside their comfort zone; they understood the value of persistence. They knew what it felt like to fail, work harder and do better. They were prepared for the modern world.” Not so American students, who are eased through high school only to discover, too late, that they lack the knowledge and skill to compete in the global economy.
      Leonie Haimson
      Class Size Matters
      124 Waverly Pl.
      New York, NY 10011
      Follow me on twitter @leoniehaimson
      Make a tax-deductible contribution to Class SizeMatters now!

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.