Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

embarassing puff piece in NYT on technology in schools

Expand Messages
  • Leonie Haimson
    Alan Schwarz, former sports reporter and apparently the new NYT national education reporter (who has done about one article per month since his appt was first
    Message 1 of 1 , Feb 13, 2012
    • 0 Attachment

      Alan Schwarz, former sports reporter and apparently the new NYT national education reporter (who has done about one article per month since his appt was first announced) does a puff piece on technology in one small NC town.  Maybe the editors got such hard pushback from their other, largely negative reporting on K12 tech expansion that the NYT was pushed to profile this program, which is apparently the favored showpiece of the US Ed Dept?


      TO be able to afford to lease the laptops (MacBook Airs) and buy software, the district laid off about 10% of the teachers, raised class sizes from 18 to 30; and  charge families pay $50 a year to subsidize computer repairs, (though the fee is waived for those who cannot afford it.) 


      I don’t know why this is even legal – in a public school system.  Though the reporter says test scores have risen, he doesn’t say what the trend is elsewhere in the state, and while he repeats the claim of the Superintendent that this has helped narrow the achievement gap, he doesn’t cite any data to back that up.


      About the only really useful information from the below is that Karen Cator, the director of educational technology for the United States Department of Education used to work for Apple.  Cator is also the only person working for Arne Duncan who has been allowed to say that test scores don’t matter when schools w/ heavy technology programs fall behind.





      Grading the Digital School

      Mooresville’s Shining Example (It’s Not Just About the Laptops)

      Description: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/02/13/us/MOORESVILLE-4/MOORESVILLE-4-articleLarge.jpg

      Jeremy M. Lange for The New York Times

      CONNECTING Tammy Rigby, a fifth-grade science teacher at East Mooresville Intermediate, helping Grace Lateef, left, and Caitlyn Yaede with a class exercise.

      Published: February 12, 2012

      MOORESVILLE, N.C. — Sixty educators from across the nation roamed the halls and ringed the rooms of East Mooresville Intermediate School, searching for the secret formula. They found it in Erin Holsinger’s fifth-grade math class.

      Grading the Digital School

      Lessons to Be Learned

      Articles in this series are looking at the intersection of education, technology and business as schools embrace digital learning.

      Enlarge This Image

      Description: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/02/13/us/MOORESVILLE-2/MOORESVILLE-2-articleInline.jpg

      Jeremy M. Lange for The New York Times

      BREAK TIME Matthew Ward regroups during class, where each student has a school-issued laptop.

      Enlarge This Image

      Description: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/02/13/us/JP-MORRESVILLE/JP-MORRESVILLE-articleInline.jpg

      Jeremy M. Lange for The New York Times

      TEAMWORK Cameron Parnian, left, and Gordon Muhlestein pondering a lesson on their school-issued MacBook Air laptops.

      Enlarge This Image

      Description: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/02/13/us/MOORESVILLE-1/MOORESVILLE-1-articleInline.jpg

      Jeremy M. Lange for The New York Times

      MATH A timed tutorial on multiplication tables, with analog times tables, in a fourth-grade math class.

      Enlarge This Image

      Description: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2012/02/13/us/MOORESVILLE-3/MOORESVILLE-3-articleInline.jpg

      Jeremy M. Lange for The New York Times

      CURIOSITY Backpacks line a hallway at East Mooresville Intermediate, a favorite stop of educators.

      Readers’ Comments

      Share your thoughts.

      There, a boy peering into his school-issued MacBook blitzed through fractions by himself, determined to reach sixth-grade work by winter. Three desks away, a girl was struggling with basic multiplication — only 29 percent right, her screen said — and Ms. Holsinger knelt beside her to assist. Curiosity was fed and embarrassment avoided, as teacher connected with student through emotion far more than Wi-Fi.

      “This is not about the technology,” Mark Edwards, superintendent of Mooresville Graded School District, would tell the visitors later over lunch. “It’s not about the box. It’s about changing the culture of instruction — preparing students for their future, not our past.”

      As debate continues over whether schools invest wisely in technology — and whether it measurably improves student achievement — Mooresville, a modest community about 20 miles north of Charlotte best known as home to several Nascar teams and drivers, has quietly emerged as the de facto national model of the digital school.

      Mr. Edwards spoke on a White House panel in September, and federal Department of Education officials often cite Mooresville as a symbolic success. Overwhelmed by requests to view the programs in action, the district now herds visitors into groups of 60 for monthly demonstrations; the waiting list stretches to April. What they are looking for is an explanation for the steady gains Mooresville has made since issuing laptops three years ago to the 4,400 4th through 12th graders in five schools (three K-3 schools are not part of the program).

      The district’s graduation rate was 91 percent in 2011, up from 80 percent in 2008. On state tests in reading, math and science, an average of 88 percent of students across grades and subjects met proficiency standards, compared with 73 percent three years ago. Attendance is up, dropouts are down. Mooresville ranks 100th out of 115 districts in North Carolina in terms of dollars spent per student — $7,415.89 a year — but it is now third in test scores and second in graduation rates.

      “Other districts are doing things, but what we see in Mooresville is the whole package: using the budget, innovating, using data, involvement with the community and leadership,” said Karen Cator, a former Apple executive who is director of educational technology for the United States Department of Education. “There are lessons to be learned.”

      Start with math lessons: each student’s MacBook Air is leased from Apple for $215 a year, including warranty, for a total of $1 million; an additional $100,000 a year goes for software. Terry Haas, the district’s chief financial officer, said the money was freed up through “incredibly tough decisions.”

      Sixty-five jobs were eliminated, including 37 teachers, which resulted in larger class sizes — in middle schools, it is 30 instead of 18 — but district officials say they can be more efficiently managed because of the technology. Some costly items had become obsolete (like computer labs), though getting rid of others tested the willingness of teachers to embrace the new day: who needs globes in the age of Google Earth?

      Families pay $50 a year to subsidize computer repairs, though the fee is waived for those who cannot afford it, about 18 percent of them. Similarly, the district has negotiated a deal so that those without broadband Internet access can buy it for $9.99 a month. Mr. Edwards said the technology had helped close racial performance gaps in a district where 27 percent of the students are minorities and 40 percent are poor enough to receive free or reduced-price lunches.

      Others see broader economic benefits.

      “Even in the downturn, we’re a seller’s market — people want to buy homes here,” said Kent Temple, a real estate agent in town. “Families say, ‘This is a chance for my child to compete with families that have more money than me.’ Six years from now, you’ll see how many from disadvantaged backgrounds go to college and make it.”

      Mooresville’s laptops perform the same tasks as those in hundreds of other districts: they correct worksheets, assemble progress data for teachers, allow for compelling multimedia lessons, and let students work at their own pace or in groups, rather than all listening to one teacher. The difference, teachers and administrators here said, is that they value computers not for the newest content they can deliver, but for how they tap into the oldest of student emotions — curiosity, boredom, embarrassment, angst — and help educators deliver what only people can. Technology, here, is cold used to warm.

      Mooresville frequently tests students in various subjects to inform teachers where each needs help. Every quarter, department heads and principals present summary data to Mr. Edwards, who uses it to assess where teachers need improvement. Special emphasis goes to identifying students who are only a few correct answers away from passing state proficiency standards. They are then told how close they are and, Mr. Edwards said, “You can, you can, you can.”

      Many classrooms have moved from lecture to lattice, where students collaborate in small groups with the teacher swooping in for consultation. Rather than tell her 11th-grade English students the definition of transcendentalism one recent day, Katheryn Higgins had them crowd-source their own — quite Thoreauly, it turned out — using Google Docs. Back in September, Ms. Higgins had the more outgoing students make presentations on the Declaration of Independence, while shy ones discussed it in an online chat room, which she monitored.

      “I’m not a very social person, but I have no problem typing on a keyboard,” said one of those shy ones, Chase Wilson. “It connected me with other students — opened me up and helped me with talking in public.”

      In math, students used individualized software modules, with teachers stopping by occasionally to answer questions. (“It’s like having a personal tutor,” said Ethan Jones, the fifth grader zooming toward sixth-grade material.) Teachers apportion their time based on the need of students, without the weaker ones having to struggle at the blackboard in front of the class; this dynamic has helped children with learning disabilities to participate and succeed in mainstream classes.

      “There are students who might not have graduated five years ago who have graduated,” said Melody Morrison, a case manager for Mooresville High School’s special education programs. “They’re not just our kids anymore. They’re everybody’s kids — all teachers throughout the school. The digital conversion has evened the playing field.”

      Many students adapted to the overhaul more easily than their teachers, some of whom resented having beloved tools — scripted lectures, printed textbooks and a predictable flow through the curriculum — vanish. The layoffs in 2009 and 2010, of about 10 percent of the district’s teachers, helped weed out the most reluctant, Mr. Edwards said; others he was able to convince that the technology would actually allow for more personal and enjoyable interaction with students.

      “You have to trust kids more than you’ve ever trusted them,” he said. “Your teachers have to be willing to give up control.”

      That was the primary concern that the 60 visitors expressed during their daylong sojourn to Mooresville in November. “I’m not sure our kids can be trusted the way these are,” one teacher from the Midwest said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to avoid trouble back home.

      Thomas Bertrand, superintendent of schools in Rochester, Ill., said he was struck by the “culture of collaboration among staff and kids” in Mooresville and would emphasize that as his district considered its own conversion.

      “There’s a tendency in teaching to try to control things, like a parent,” said Scott Allen, a high school chemistry teacher in South Granville, N.C. “But I learn best at my own pace, and you have to realize that students learn best at their own pace, too.”

      Mooresville still has some growing pains. In one ninth-grade social studies class, a video that easily could have been shown on a large screen instead went through the students’ laptops, several of which balked, “Unable to find proxy server.” One fourth grader, having to complete 10 multiplication questions in two minutes for the software to let her move on, simply consulted her times tables, making the lesson more about speed typing than mathematics. And those concerned about corporate encroachment on public schools would blanch at the number of Apple logos in the hallways, and at the district’s unofficial slogan: “iBelieve, iCan, iWill.”

      Mooresville’s tremendous focus on one data point — the percentage of students passing proficiency exams — has its pitfalls as well. At November’s quarterly data meeting, there were kudos for several numbers whose rise or dip was not statistically significant, and no recognition that the students who passed by one or two questions could very well fail by one or two the next time around. Several colorful pie charts used metrics that were meaningless.

      “I realize the fallacy of looking at one measure,” Mr. Edwards said in an interview afterward. “We look at scholarships, A.P. courses taken, honors courses, SAT scores. But the measure that we use is what the state posts, and what parents look at when they’re comparing schools moving here.”

      After three years of computers permeating every area of their schooling, Mooresville students barely remember life before the transformation and are somewhat puzzled by the gaggle of visitors who watch them every month. (“At times it’s kind of like being a lab rat,” one 11th grader said.) But Mooresville understands its growing fame in the world of education, much of which has yet to find the balance between old tricks and new technology.

      “So,” Ms. Higgins asked her English class after the bell rang, “you think you’re going to like transcendentalism?”

      “Only if you’re a nonconformist,” a student cracked.

      A version of this article appeared in print on February 13, 2012, on page A10 of the New York edition with the headline: Mooresville’s Shining Example (It’s Not Just About the Laptops).



      Leonie Haimson

      Executive Director

      Class Size Matters

      124 Waverly Pl.

      New York, NY 10011







      Follow me on twitter @leoniehaimson


      Make a tax-deductible contribution to Class Size Matters now!


      Subscribe to Class Size Matters news by emailing classsizematters-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

      Subscribe to NYC education news by emailing nyceducationnews-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.