13667Re: Festivals and local vs nat'l bands
- Sep 2, 2003Kathy,
I've already agreed that "required" is much too BG police.
I do feel that festival bands should be selected for more than just
their ability to put on a "killer stage show". There's plenty of
talent out there. They should be chosen in addition for their
willingness to participate in the festival beyond just their
performance. You certainly do. And so does Clyde.
Some of the most memorable stage presentations have been jams.
How about Dawg and Jake?
That's happening all over the venue. If the jam you're standing
outside of is a "cluster-pluck", move on. The "magic" is out there IF
the pickers are there.
Earlier I wrote: Build a festival for the pickers and the grinners
will come too (if you market the"magic") Without pickers the
"festival" is just a show.
What is it that brings pickers from far and wide to a festival?
1. jamming and places and time to jam.
3. band scramble
4. accessibility and affability of performers.
6. Time to socialize with friends (perhaps seen only at festivals)
7. Performing bands that have a personal connection
There's probably lots more...
Any thoughts on developing a proposed "mission statement" for a
re: Old Folks and jamming. If you're tired, go to bed. A well
planned festival should schedule plenty of time for jams. (extended
lunch/dinner breaks) Time for jamming shouldn't be just after
midnight. Besides, ten hours is way too long to sit in folding chairs
stageside. How about every couple of hours have a scheduled break and
INVITE the attendees to wander the venue and find the "magic" that
I've been talking about.
Branson? Not me...
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>