Re: [NUTS] Re: nanos ARE micros
- That's because you're a WEIRDO! :-D
I enjoy your caches Courtney. There is, however, a current propensity for LOTS of folks to list their caches with an unknown size when it really isn't the type of case you describe. I can see having a problem settling on a size for some of your hides.
On 8/10/2011 1:22 PM, Courtney Calkins wrote:
As a hider, the problem I often run into is that the “entire cache” that I hide is often much larger than a nano or a micro. I build caches that are fairly large, but many times there is only room for a log. For instance I just had a hide that was 4-5 inches long but it cannot hold anything but the log…. (size??) I told Bobolu the size of the cache and it actually threw him off. I can think of one cache I hid and it was 18 inches long and 5-6 inches wide, but could only hold a log, so I left the size blank. I don’t hide “typical” caches, so I don’t know how to accurately describe the cache. When I am not sure, I leave the SIZE blank.
So I’m not trying to distract or trick people, but many times I don’t know what the “fair” description would be of my caches would be.
.Quad (aka Courtney)
Courtney CC Calkins, LMFT
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents or messages attached to it, may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, then you are (1) notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, saving, reading or use of this information is strictly prohibited, (2) requested to discard and delete this e-mail and any attachments, and (3) requested to immediately notify us by e-mail that you mistakenly received this message Courtney@... fax (530) 879-3712 or telephone (530) 893-4245. Thank you.