Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

6220Re: [NUTS] nanos ARE micros

Expand Messages
  • JeoMc5@aol.com
    Aug 9, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      "neither side will  blink."
       
      Nice pun, especially since the nanos were originally blinkers ;)
       
      Jeo




      -----Original Message-----
      From: Anthony Guzzi <dukeofurl@...>
      To: nuts_ <nuts_@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 11:44 pm
      Subject: Re: [NUTS] nanos ARE micros

       
      On 8/8/2011 9:57 PM, Ed & Julie Nelson wrote:
      > Just a question for the group:
      >
      > Why have most people stop listing nanos under the "micro" size?
      >
      > Groundspeak adamantly states they will not make a new size category for
      > nanos, since they are covered under the micro description. Nanos are micros.
      >
      > I filter out micros, but when nanos are left as "Size: ? other" (the
      > size is not chosen, or intentionally left as 'other') they don't get
      > filtered.
      >
      > Is there a reason not to list them as micros on the cache page?

      I think it might be people wanting to make their hide that much more
      difficult by not saying the size.

      OR

      it could be the people actually rebelling against what groundspeak says
      and insisting that nanos are not actually micros, and neither side will
      blink.
    • Show all 10 messages in this topic