- Hi Lotta, ... Oops! Of course you are right. I should have read the report properly. I had better check that link:Message 1 of 35 , Sep 8, 2009View SourceHi Lotta,
On 08 Sep 09 22:46 loro <tabbie@...> said:
> >So is the the snippet of code I posted earlier valid (though theOops! Of course you are right. I should have read the report
> >validator says it's not)?
> No, it isn't valid. But the use of is. A validator would
> complain about that you have used an inline element (A) directly
> inside BODY without wrapping it in a block level element such as for
> example P. That isn't allowed in Strict, only in Transitional.
I had better check that link:
more thoroughly too. Perhaps it wasn't the that was causing the
problems I thought it was, but something more fundamental.
- ... As Axel said, don t let the number of errors scare you. ... No you aren t. :-) LottaMessage 35 of 35 , Sep 9, 2009View SourceMike wrote:
>Interesting. How such a little thing can cause so much hassle.As Axel said, don't let the number of errors scare you.
> > See? Not that hard, was it? :-)No you aren't. :-)
>Right now I am bleeding out the ears...