Thanks for your valuable rule of thumb.
You make a good point about the disparate ways in which my users interact with
the newsletter. If I can't find a way to store only one copy of the content
each month and if I can't find a less labor-intensive way of editing the
product, I will probably drop this question and continue with the methods with
which I am familiar and with which my readers are comfortable.
Also, I may need to stick with the current method because I don't see any
solution to the problems with citations if the articles are not presented in a
traditional newsletter format. Currently one can refer to a graph or a passage
or any other part of an article by citing only the issue date and page number.
If the articles are in separate files (of whatever format), they will not have
consecutive pagination from one article to the next. It will then be necessary
to cite title along with issue date plus the page number within that document.
The alternative would be to begin the pagination of each article after the
first one with a page number that is one greater than the final page number of
the preceding article.
This discussion is drifting off topic for an HTML group.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Axel Berger" <Axel-Berger@...>
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: [NH] Open a Folder of PDF files
> Marcelo Bastos wrote:
>> When I call online PDF "dreadful", I refer not to the
>> presentation, but to the experience:
> May I offer the following rule of thumb:
> If the document is meant to be loaded down, archived and read at
> another time at the reader's discretion, go for PDF.
> If you expect the reader to just read it online, scan it (in the
> human, not the technical sense), and continue browsing, probably
> along links provided in the text, then go for HTML every time.
> For that reason I offer lists of literature used and cited in both
> formats, which is easy as both are generated automatically out of a
> database application.