Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [NH] centering image for all monitors

Expand Messages
  • Edward
    This does not work on my monitor. The right logo is under the left logo.The picture and statements are to far to the right. ed Blessed are they who can laugh
    Message 1 of 20 , Jan 8, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      This does not work on my monitor. The right logo is under the left logo.The
      picture and statements are to far to the right.
      ed

      Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves
      for they shall never cease to be amused.
      -- Unknown

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: "Don - HtmlFixIt.com" <don@...>
      To: <ntb-html@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 2:36 PM
      Subject: Re: [NH] centering image for all monitors


      > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
      > "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
      > <html lang="en">
      > <head>
      > <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
      > <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
      > <title>Saltillo Home Page</title>
      > <style type="text/css" media="screen">
      > body
      > {
      > margin: 0;
      > padding: 0;
      > font-size: 90%;
      > font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;
      > color: blue;
      > }
      >
      > #gutter
      > {
      > float: left;
      > width: 3%;
      > height: 1px;
      > }
      >
      > #col1
      > {
      > float: left;
      > width: 800px;
      > background-color: #fff;
      > margin-bottom: 10px;
      > margin-left: 3%;
      > text-align: center;
      > }
      >
      > #col2
      > {
      > float: left;
      > width: 170px;
      > background-color: #fff;
      > margin-bottom: 10px;
      > }
      >
      > #col3
      > {
      > float: left;
      > width: 170px;
      > margin-left: 3%;
      > background-color: #fff;
      > margin-bottom: 10px;
      > }
      >
      > #footer
      > {
      > clear: both;
      > height: 50px;
      > background-color: #fff;
      > }
      >
      > h1
      > {
      > margin: 0;
      > padding: 5px;
      > text-align: center;
      > color: blue;
      > }
      >
      > h2
      > {
      > margin-top: 0;
      > padding-top: 7px;
      > text-align: center
      > font-size: 25pt
      > color: blue;
      > }
      >
      > h2, p
      > {
      > margin-left: 7px;
      > margin-right: 7px;
      > color: blue;
      > }
      > h3 {text-align: center
      > font-size: 20pt
      > color: blue;
      > }
      >
      > h4 {
      > onload='javascript:write_date()'
      > }
      >
      > a:link {
      > text-decoration: none;
      > color: navy;
      > }
      > a:visited {
      > text-decoration: none;
      > color: navy;
      > }
      > a:active {
      > text-decoration: none;
      > color: navy;
      > }
      > a:hover {color: red;
      > text-decoration: bold;
      > }
      > </style>
      > </head>
      >
      >
      > <body>
      > <div id="gutter"></div>
      > <div id="col2">
      > <p><img
      > src="http://home.comcast.net/~ebrown1927/Weatherford/images/elite1a.jpg"
      > width="144" height="157" border="0" alt="elite physical therapy logo"
      > /></p>
      > <p>
      > <a href="home.html">Home</a><br>
      > <a href="dir.html">Directions</a><br>
      > <a href="water_aerobics.html">Water Aerobics</a><br>
      > <a href="aquatic_therapy.html">Water Therapy</a><br>
      > <a href="contact.html">Contact Us</a><br>
      > <a href="about.html">About Us</a><br>
      > <a href="gallery.html">Our Picture Gallery</a>
      > </p>
      > </div>
      >
      > <div id="col1">
      > <h1>Saltillo</h1>
      > <h2>Elite Physical Therapy and Aquatic Center</h2>
      > <p><img
      > src="http://home.comcast.net/~ebrown1927/Weatherford/images/bldg1b.jpg"
      > width="360" height="187" border="0" alt="physical therapy building" /></p>
      > <h3>"Meeting all of your Physical Therapy<br>and Rehabilitation
      > Needs"</h3>
      >
      >
      > </div>
      >
      > <div id="col3">
      > <img
      > src="http://home.comcast.net/~ebrown1927/Weatherford/images/elite1a.jpg"
      > width="144" height="157" border="0" alt="elite physical therapy
      > logo"></div>
      >
      >
      > <div id="footer"><!-- currently empty footer --></div>
      > </body>
      > </html>
      >
      >
      > Edward wrote:
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >> ----- Original Message -----
      >> From: "Axel Berger" <Axel-Berger@...>
      >> To: <ntb-html@yahoogroups.com>
      >> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 4:32 AM
      >> Subject: Re: [NH] centering image for all monitors
      >>
      >>
      >> Alex wrote:
      >>
      >>> Sorry for being a nasty unhelpful soandso again, but your code does
      >>> not even validate and is full of mistakes. Validating tools exist
      >>> and trying to make anything surrounded by unvalid code do something
      >>> specific, be it sing, dance, or centre, is a mug's game.
      >>>
      >>> Apart from errors and typos like missing quotes there is one big
      >>> mistage: You let the user load down a huge image over his slow and
      >>> expensive connection and then use the browser's (any browser's) very
      >>> basic and substandard mechanism to scale it down. Always scale
      >>> images to the desired size first and insert them at exactly that
      >>> size.
      >>>
      >>> Axel
      >> and he also wrote:
      >> One shouldn't use *any* fixed size for fonts. It is up to the user to
      >> set up his browser to suit his monitor and eyesight and up to us to
      >> respect these choices. This means the basic font size for normal text
      >> should never be messed with and all other sizes, big, headlines, and the
      >> "small print", ought to be expressed in units of em. Many sites are done
      >> so badly that the only sensible choice is turning off the rendering of
      >> CSS completely. Is this what we want to force our readers (and sometimes
      >> voters and customers) into having to do?
      >>
      >> Alex,
      >> Of course you are correct and I will endeavor to make the necessary
      >> changes
      >> as time marches on. I really appreciate you help. I think letting the
      >> viewer be the master of the fonts is a great idea. Would you give me a
      >> web
      >> page site of yours so I can view the source and see exactly how you did
      >> this. I can read about it all day on W3C and never really fully
      >> understand
      >> what they are saying. Seeing the code on a page is very helpful and
      >> changing
      >> the fonts to the ones that I like would be great. Once again let me say
      >> thank you for replying to my questions. I really do appreciate all the
      >> critiques, I always find them very useful and the people on this yahoo
      >> group
      >> are always so good to pitch in and help.
      >>
      >> I will check the images, I thought I had photoshopped them down to a
      >> small
      >> resolution. Very sorry about that. I will do make the resolution smaller
      >> as
      >> time permits and before I put the pages up on a hosting site.
      >> Ed B
      >>
      >>
      >> ------------------------------------
      >>
      >> Fookes Software: http://www.fookes.com/
      >> NoteTab website: http://www.notetab.com/
      >> NoteTab Discussion Lists: http://www.notetab.com/groups.php
      >>
      >> ***
      >> Yahoo! Groups Links
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >>
      >
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Fookes Software: http://www.fookes.com/
      > NoteTab website: http://www.notetab.com/
      > NoteTab Discussion Lists: http://www.notetab.com/groups.php
      >
      > ***
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >
    • Axel Berger
      ... There are two: http://axel.berger-odenthal.de/ http://fdp-odenthal.de/pages/Technik.shtml The first is my own and as primitive and basic as it gets. The
      Message 2 of 20 , Jan 8, 2009
      • 0 Attachment
        Edward wrote:
        > Would you give me a web page site of yours

        There are two:
        http://axel.berger-odenthal.de/
        http://fdp-odenthal.de/pages/Technik.shtml

        The first is my own and as primitive and basic as it gets. The
        second is done for the local party and the page with the technical
        details is in English (as technical documentation ought to be IMHO).
        You'll notice I disregarded my own rule about font size and set it
        at 75% of the browser default (but using a relative size it can
        still be scaled). That's because the visual design is a faithful
        copy and ripoff of other party designs, though the code is mine,
        clean and validating.

        The technical sample is seriously out of date by now, but the main
        parts not changed.

        Axel
      • Cary
        Basically, all modern, major browsers handle true xhtml, that is xhtml served as xhtml rather than html, except IE which will ask you to save the page as a
        Message 3 of 20 , Jan 8, 2009
        • 0 Attachment
          Basically, all modern, major browsers handle true xhtml, that is xhtml
          served as xhtml rather than html, except IE which will ask you to save
          the page as a file.

          Obviously, sites configured for access by the general public are set
          up to serve pages as html so IE won't choke. Xhtml 1.0 is fine for
          this purpose, but xhtml 1.1 should only be used if it is in fact going
          to be served as xhtml.


          --- In ntb-html@yahoogroups.com, Greg Chapman wrote:
          >
          > Hi,
          >
          > On 08 Jan 09 19:14 MotoMania said:
          > > Glad that got things started. I try to stay W3C XHTML 1.1 and CSS
          > > standard with any sites that I create or update.
          >
          > I understand that no modern browser actually renders true XHTML and
          > simply converts the code to HTML and renders that. In consequence,
          > there is little point in writing XHTML markup for web sites. These
          > days XHTML is seen as a (rare?) blind alley up which the W3C
          > travelled. Indeed, I believe there is now an W3C HTML v5 working group
          > to update HTML for the modern environment.
          >
          > I confess that I have never bothered to check out these tales (from
          > people I respect) which I read on other forums, but the snippets I do
          > read elsewhere suggest that their remarks are true.
          >
          > These days my own sites use HTML4 STRICT (which obliges use of CSS).
          > It certainly handles the vast majority of hassles I used to get with
          > some browsers.
          >
          > Greg
          >
        • Cary
          Looking at the current page, the link styling should be changed so hover comes before active. a:link {text-decoration: none; color: navy;} a:visited
          Message 4 of 20 , Jan 8, 2009
          • 0 Attachment
            Looking at the current page, the link styling should be changed so
            hover comes before active.

            a:link {text-decoration: none; color: navy;}
            a:visited {text-decoration: none; color: navy;}
            a:hover {color: red; text-decoration: bold}
            a:active {text-decoration: none; color: navy;}
            a.other:link {color: #99FFFF; text-decoration: none}
            a.other:visited {color: #99FFFF; text-decoration: none}
            a.other:hover {color: pink; text-decoration: bold}
            a.other:active {color: red; text-decoration: none}


            --- In ntb-html@yahoogroups.com, "Edward" wrote:
            >
            > I am having trouble getting an image to center after putting a table
            with the links ot other pages on the left side of the page...
          • loro
            ... Exactly my opinion. With reservations for what Cary already said, that XHTML is treated as XML if it s served with an XHTML content-type. But it can t be,
            Message 5 of 20 , Jan 8, 2009
            • 0 Attachment
              Greg Chapman wrote:
              >I understand that no modern browser actually renders true XHTML and
              >simply converts the code to HTML and renders that. In consequence,
              >there is little point in writing XHTML markup for web sites.

              Exactly my opinion. With reservations for what Cary already said,
              that XHTML is treated as XML if it's served with an XHTML
              content-type. But it can't be, partly because of IE and partly
              because many (most?) XHTML pages wouldn't display in any browser if
              they were served with the correct content-type.

              XML has few requirements, but one of them is that a page that isn't
              well-formed shouldn't be displayed by the browser. All browsers
              conform to this. Since many XHTML pages aren't as well-written as
              their authors think when they plaster that XHTML button on, there
              would be a lot of blank pages on the web and most authors would
              quickly revert to HTML and the blessings of the error handling HTML
              parsers are so richly equipped with.

              This requirement makes me think XML isn't really suited to be used on
              this side of the server. Generated on the server, validated and
              foolproofed on the server, maybe. But how often does that happen? Can
              you imagine a site of any importance to its users or to the owner
              that goes blank until someone has found the tiny little error that
              maybe originates deep down in some server side program?

              Strict instead of Transitional is much more important. The fact that
              there even exists a Transitional version of XHTML and that it's
              widely used say everything about what the XHTML hype is about. I
              think the expression is "blowing smoke". ;-)

              Lotta
            • Axel Berger
              ... I would consider that as a huge advantage over current affairs. Now there is all kinds of junk all over the place and if it isn t displayed, people blame
              Message 6 of 20 , Jan 9, 2009
              • 0 Attachment
                loro wrote:
                > there would be a lot of blank pages on the web and most
                > authors would quickly revert to HTML and the blessings
                > of the error handling HTML parsers are so richly equipped
                > with.

                I would consider that as a huge advantage over current affairs. Now
                there is all kinds of junk all over the place and if it isn't
                displayed, people blame their browser. More importantly and worse,
                if you go and complain to the junk merchants, they have the gall to
                tell you everyone else was satisfied and that it must be your fault.
                And of course, if all browsers gave error messages instead of
                guessed at approximate renderings our life would be easier and we'd
                not need to employ all those extra validating tools and would not
                get caught out by those easily overlooked little mistakes, that
                happen not to show up when trying things out in the few browsers and
                versions we happen to have at our disposal.

                Life would become harder for all thise idiots out there refusing to
                take care and not trying to do a good rather than botched job, but I
                don't see how that would be bad.

                Axel
              Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.