Re: [NH] Re: "hiding" keywords in the background
This is a technique known as "cloaking" - presenting one page to the search
engines and one to the visitor. As has been stated, it will get you banned
from the search engines. I just finished writing an article about it:
If your content is good, and you use the title and content met tags, along
with a few other techniques (i.e., keywords) you will have your visitors.
At 9/20/04 08:18 AM, bizshop1 wrote:
>Don't do it! Not only does it not help anymore - it may cause you to
>be banned and NEVER able to get back in.
>--- In email@example.com, Mike Breiding - Morgantown WV
> > Greetings,
> > As I understand it most search engines do not use the keyword meta
> > indexing but do use the title bars and the first line(s) of text in
> > In order to take advantage of this I have "hidden" keywords in the
> > http://mbreiding.us/pawpaw/ by styling fonts the same color as the
> > background. this has the effect of making them "invisible".
> > Anyone have any thoughts on this as far as it's effectiveness and
> > negative effects on a page overall?
> > Thanks,
> > -Mike
>Yahoo! Groups Links
> In order to take advantage of this I have "hidden"That's essentially the same technique that spammer's use to attempt to slip
> keywords in the page: http://mbreiding.us/pawpaw/ by
> styling fonts the same color as the background. this has
> the effect of making them "invisible".
past spam detectors. I'm not sure about the other major players but Popfile
does calculations to determine the difference between background - ie. it
flags forinstance lighter blue on light blue or vice versa, so I'm not
surprised to hear others say Goggle will catch you out too :-(
Have you already removed the hidden keywords per others' suggestions? I
turned on all the Accessibility options to see if I could find the hidden
words but don't see any cloaked words.
Frazier river in British Columbia years ago and had a great time.
Unfortunately that was long before digital cameras so I can't put up
anything to match yours. If you ever get a chance to try the same trip I'll
bet you have the time of your life :-)
Regards ... Alec
---- Original Message ----
From: "Mike Breiding - Morgantown WV" <mike@...>
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 07:09
Subject: [gla: [NH] "hiding" keywords in the background
- Hi Mike,
yes to the remarks from others here: the purpose of search indexing
is to reveal the readable content the page. if you want the page to
index using your hidden keywords then just don't hide them. use those
keywords within the text content of your page.
additionally, I did notice some blown links:
on these pages the [home] link is incorrect and brings an error.
also some incorrect page displays:
should link directly to:
you should not simply copy someone else's page code and add your link
to the bottom so it will navigate within your namespace. many folks
consider this stealing and are inclined to prosecute. directories
that have folks who actually look at pages will see this and react
with disgust. otherwise it is just plain wrong.
I just checked the map links and they work.
I download links and store locally so as to prevent broken links if a page
goes down or moves.
This always make the front page available and still links to the actual
site via that page.
I make no pretence about the pages having originated with me.
If anyone ever complains I will remove the links.
At 12:41 PM 9/21/2004 +0000, you wrote:
>Hi Mike,[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>yes to the remarks from others here: the purpose of search indexing
>is to reveal the readable content the page. if you want the page to
>index using your hidden keywords then just don't hide them. use those
>keywords within the text content of your page.
>additionally, I did notice some blown links:
>on these pages the [home] link is incorrect and brings an error.
>also some incorrect page displays:
>should link directly to:
>you should not simply copy someone else's page code and add your link
>to the bottom so it will navigate within your namespace. many folks
>consider this stealing and are inclined to prosecute. directories
>that have folks who actually look at pages will see this and react
>with disgust. otherwise it is just plain wrong.