5969RE: [NH] advice on good design wanted
- Mar 30, 2007Hi Alex,
You might want to look at this article
http://www.netmechanic.com/news/vol4/accessibility_no17.htm It's a few years
old but that might be perfect since as you've said, "write your code as
backwards compatible as possible."
I use CSS for layout, not out of principle, but because that was the thing
to do when I started to learn this maddening craft. I've been using the <a
href="#navigation">Skip to navigation links or content</a> technique for a
long time and just style as display: none.
I'm learning tables now for data presentation and found part 1 a real eye
brought up this and many other interesting articles on the subject.
As a side note here is insightful article
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf
Of Axel Berger
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 2:24 AM
To: NoteTab HTML
Subject: [NH] advice on good design wanted
My daughter wants a site in the classic three columns and header design.
Now I am in a bit of a quandry how to do it. I am I firm believer in
HTML for structure and content and CSS for design and insist on writing
HTML that's fully useable on its own. Most of that is easy: Content DIV
for the middle column first, side columns after. But this makes terribly
long pages and it really would be desirable to place the two slim side
columns side by side. For two images that's easy, but it can't be done
for DIVs with HTML (or can it?).
Do you suppose it might be acceptable to use a table with the top row
colspan 2 for the content and two cells in the second row and declare
that às "this is not a table" in CSS? Using tables for layout totally
goes against the grain but it would aid useability. Does anyone know
which is better for blind and keyboard-only users?
- << Previous post in topic