Re: Have we got a numeric sort yet?
- --- In email@example.com, "diodeom" <diomir@...> wrote:
> Here is something I played with after digesting your code, Flo:
> an entertaining take on proper numeric sorting, without a lag of
> firing an external app though....
I think that's the most efficient solution we've seen so far for that job using NT's own means only.
Nevertheless, we are still waiting for a function like
What does Eric think of this?
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Eb" <ebbtidalflats@...> wrote:
>... NoteTab is an interpreter, not a compiler. That means any complex algorithm you build in clip code is going to be much slower, than it would be as a compiled (built-in) function.I'm still impressed how quick clips run. Reminds me of writing good old Advanced Basic code running on an XT. You know, a 5.1 gogigahertz machine still processes a spreadsheet about as fast as it used to!
> Bubble sort requires (n squared) iterations in the worst-case scenario.That sounds better. Thanks for the reminder.
> On the other hand, it might be a good exercise to code in clip code. <grin>Just for comparison</grin>.Gone are the days of the lazy uni student where time was a misspent luxury... <sigh> ... although I can't complain.. I had an entire half a Sunday to sit and relax this week. :)
My current project needed a 'calculate by hand' style multiplication routine to handle ridiculously large numbers. To be honest, I don't mind the 7 seconds it takes to multiply two - one hundred digit -numbers.
Fascinating really and the exciting bit is that we seem to have come full circle and once again the computer is doing exactly what the user wants... without the OOP, "compiler declares headache" syndrome. <smile> </b>