Axel Berger <Axel-Berger@...> wrote:
> I also tried incorporating this solution into my earlier Replace,
> but still no luck, so I'll stick with the loop. It is noticeably
> slower but still only a second or less for any sensible number of
In comparing execution times I'd account here for the fact that while one clip rather idly swaps strings, the other according to the objectives has some actual work to do, one image at the time, one function at the time.
BTW, sorry, Axel, for anagramming your name @ msg # 20326.