Re: [NTO] image overflow
- Don - HtmlFixIt.com wrote:
> I'm on board with these suggestions as well. I have actually built aYes! You helped me with this a coupla years ago. I use that modified
> clip in the past to build links from my thumbs to the "bigger" images.
> Haven't got a copy handy, but easily can be done.
clip to generate the code for linked images. This has really helped me a
a lot in getting my pages up quicker and with more consistency.
> I seldom put up aI use the Image Tweak add-on for FF:
> picture larger than 800px. Just isn't necessary.
> One of the things I like about firefox is no matter how big you make
> your picture it will autosize to the screen and you can zoom if you
It is very handy.
>Technology is improving and most scalings are done well, but doI have to say "real thumbnail" is a matter of person choice.
> your viewers a favor and give a real thumbnail view first.
- Greg Chapman wrote:
> Someone will have to tell me exactly how those figures areThe main thing is that all that asks the wrong question. What one really
> derived and whether they have any meaning in the modern world.
needs to know ist what the window dimensions are, the screen is beside
the point. There even are people running a virtual screen several times
the size of the physical one so they can scroll between their windows or
for a two-screen setup. Imagine their joy, when some script opens a
window at full screen and without resize.
Sadly it is far easier to ask for the screen dimensions than the window
ones, which are one the things older IE versions did differently from
do things that are wrong for the window. Zooming in new IE and Opera
versions makes things even more difficult but manageable.