Re: [NTO] Add Blog To Website
- On 9/30/07, Axel Berger <Axel-Berger@...> wrote:
>Actually, that's exactly what MovableType (similar to WordPress) does
> I'll admit there is something in that. Though for all here facing
> similar problems in straight HTML may I remind you of the basic W3C
> "Cool URIs don't change": http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI
- it can do the same date type archive structure that they espouse in
that article. I think that WordPress can too, it's something you
chose when you set up either program. MT can also archive by category
which can be more useful depending on the type of site and it can also
do both types of archives at the same time, category and date
structure - iirc WP can also do that.
So CMS can be very useful for creating good, long-lasting URIs and
it's all created on the fly as you add new articles or new categories,
as time changes and a new month or new year rolls around, the CMS
automatically creates the necessary folders to store the addiitional
Vox Populli, webhosting for fans
Glenfinnan, webhosting for everything else
>Basically if you name and place files for what they are rather than forHi Axel,
>what you're using them for at the moment, you can completely rearrange
>your pages without having to move stuff. Many companies and other big
>organisations rubbish all your bookmarks every couple of months or so as
>a matter if course. On my own site I provide forwarding files and even a
>server redirect for those who might have bookmarked an ill-chosen
>earlier arrangement of things.
That's where tags, categories and archives come into play: good
blogsoftware organizes your entries according to your own specification,
with paths and URLs completely to your own liking.
I've been using Movable Type for a couple of years, not to write a blog
for my own, but in order to provide students to maintain their own blog.
At the time of selection MT was the most flexible solution, and one
license/installation was capable of running multiple blogs with multiple
authors. That may have changed, I do not follow the market anymore,
since I'm not involved in that task anymore.
Anyhow: MT was great, because it allowed the unskilled to create webpages
(and upload documents) easily, whereas the skilled still were able to customize
templates, css, page-arrangements etc.
I never regretted my choice.
BTW: I have used MT to create a regular website - this allowed other people
to maintain the site without extensive training. This worked out very well.
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]