RE: 1and1 signup review.. Was RE: RE: [NTO] Free Web Host - Should I try it?
- Hi Jason,
> I'm signing up for 1and1 right now.Could you phone on my behalf! :-)
> After giving them a phone number ("Toll free, non-geographic, and
> numbers outside the USA and Canada cannot be used.")
I'm a UK based customer of 1and1 and I'm paying 4.99UKP per month plus
17.5%VAT for considerably less than this offer!! I'm jealous as hell :-(
I've no significant complaints about their service.
I can confirm that they are German in origin. A lot of their FAQ pages,
show a lot of mis-spelling and other strangeness that demonstrates this.
My big problem was that I had failed to realise how crippled their "ready to
run CGI library" was. I had expected it to be at least the equivalent of my
previous hosts, but it isn't. I am now looking for an alternative host
where I can get full cgi access, so I can install a script of my liking
rather than being forced to accept a "not quite what I want" alternative.
At 1and1 that is going to double the charge - an unacceptable level for a
small hobby site.
As to support... A newbie friend signed up for a Windows hosted account
with them, rather than Linux, and found that support was absolutely useless!
He couldn't get his FrontPage Extensions to work. They went into "third
party problems - turn to them" mode!
- --- In ntb-OffTopic@yahoogroups.com, "Greg Chapman" <greg@e...>
> I can confirm that they are German in origin. A lot of their FAQSomewhere is all the agreement/TOS text it said something about
> show a lot of mis-spelling and other strangeness that demonstrates
being in, or the agreement being governed by New York law. I didn't
notice any misspellings on those pages.
>Now this part I don't understand. The tiny web space my ISP provides
> My big problem was that I had failed to realise how crippled
> their "ready to
> run CGI library" was. I had expected it to be at least the
> equivalent of my
> previous hosts, but it isn't. I am now looking for an alternative
> where I can get full cgi access, so I can install a script of my
> rather than being forced to accept a "not quite what I want"
> At 1and1 that is going to double the charge - an unacceptable
> level for a small hobby site.
has no script support. I was pretty disappointed because back when I
discovered that I was hoping to see a little of my Perl in action.
My reading of the 1and1 TOS was that if you use their canned stuff,
they charge you, but that you can use your own.
Also the bandwith limit sounds like plenty, but I have no idea! I
have several interests (e.g., photography, scripting, cooking), I'd
probably be inclined to post interesting material and invite fellow
hobbyists in open forums. It would probably be a matter of "when it
rains, it pours" in terms of hits.
I already have a large free space for posting photographs, but am
limited to their software and layout. It is sometimes impossibly
slow but at other times it flies! There is no bandwith limit, no
advertising, and you get up to 200 mb space. Based in the UK, it is
http://www.fotopic.net if anyone's interested. They also let you
divide your space among multiple public and private galleries, each
of which can have a chosen name. My public one is at
http://sherisg3.fotopic.net . I have a couple of private ones for
sharing family photos. Great deal which I hope will continue.
They've recently added some fee-based services.
- Hi Sheri,
> Somewhere is all the agreement/TOS text it said something aboutThat may be it! I am referring to http://www.1and1.co.uk, which is all
> being in, or the agreement being governed by New York law. I didn't
> notice any misspellings on those pages.
priced in UKP and looks thoroughly English, initially!
> Now this part I don't understand. The tiny web space my ISP providesAh! I suspect that the UK is rather different to elsewhere. Thanks to the
> has no script support.
de-regulation of our telephone system some time back, we have an unusual
In order to help break up the privatised government monopoly it was forced
to pay those organisations who set up businesses which generated traffic on
their network. ISPs found it cost less to buy/run a rack of modems and a
server or two than they generated through inbound calls. Result: Masses of
no-subscription ISPs arrived on the UK scene, who also provided a healthy
chunk of advert-free web space and ready to run scripts for stuff like hit
counters and basic forms. Yes, you had to pay for the phone call but, at
that stage, that wasn't a problem in the UK market where we were never used
to free local calls.
Now things have changed a bit and most people pay an ISP subscription in
order to get flat monthly fee connections to their ISP, so avoiding the
unexpected big phone bill. For 99% of domestic users, the web space
allowances and scripts, such as they were, and bandwidth allowances, if
published, were much bigger than needed. Businesses, however, did need more
and a completely separate market developed for additional facilities. Being
aimed at businesses, charges could be correspondingly high - hence the kinds
of prices than I am paying! :-(
> I already have a large free space for posting photographs...
> http://sherisg3.fotopic.net . I have a couple of private ones forI guess this is one of those companies that is still in its build a name,
> sharing family photos. Great deal which I hope will continue.
> They've recently added some fee-based services.
grab a share of the market phase. The market is maturing rapidly with the
roll-out of broadband - still a rarity, here. Maybe they foresee a business
opportunity a couple of years down the line as everybody moves over to
- Good point Jeff, I've just put a tickler in my Ecco file for Nov 20th 2006
Regards ... Alec
---- Original Message ----
From: "Jeff" <scismgenie@...>
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 11:23
Subject: [gla: Re: [NTO] Free Web Host - Should I try it?
> Watch out, they will start billing you automatiically on your phone