3969RE: [NTO] WinME vs WinXP?
- Jan 7, 2003Glad the emails are working better!
It's one thing to fix a product, but don't get the issues crossed.
Let me ask anyone who agrees with the "Microsoft way" the following
"Why doesn't everyone do it?"
For instance...Linux again! They made such a great FREE OS (and
flavors) and it doesn't require you to let them in and snoop around and
invade your privacy, does it? Unix-based products don't do it and they
run more stable and reliable than probably any other OS on the market.
But do you see them with all their disclaimers on letting them in the
back door? Do you see their kernel constantly accessing the Internet to
send information to their servers so they can identify who you are and
what you are doing?
I don't want to have to agree to let someone possibly compromise my
security just so that something can get fixed. One issue has nothing to
do with the other, and that's what do few people understand.
Don't allow them to blur the lines between security and "bugs"; that's
totally ridiculous! I can download Mandrake and install it and never
service pack it and it'll run forever, as long as the hardware is ok.
Microsoft's OS? It'll call home all the time, crash, freeze, etc. And
for that I have to let them in so they can fix the "bugs"? I don't
Everyone has a choice, and I'm glad that mine is not Microsoft. I'm
glad that I do not depend on the OS like so many people do.
I choose privacy, and I don't think twice about it or lose any sleep on
it when I have a secure OS.
From: DA [mailto:daoki01@...]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [NTO] WinME vs WinXP?
I think you are slightly off the main topic, but it is
a related issue.
I'm generally in agreement with you. I think it is really
unethical to sell an OS under one set of rules then change
the rules if you want updates. They were going to put the
snooping in the first release until there was enough bad
press about it.
Remember, even MS says most of these updates are bugs, not
new features. So, if you want the bugs fixed, you have to
let them snoop.
If I didn't have to use WinXP, I wouldn't. I don't think
they are misusing the information they are gathering -- Yet.
But, there are so many examples of MS being, "ethically
challenged," that I don't trust MS. If there is $$$ to
be made, they will do it if they think they can get away
with it. Later on, when everyone is accustomed to this
snooping, is when MS will make their move. The only way
to prevent this is to keep them constantly under a
PS. By the way, for some reason your posts no longer
create any problems when I download them.
Brian Binder wrote:
> If I missed a post on this, sorry.
> The one thing I think that you all are missing the point on is XP's
> If your stability is a fair trade, then disregard this email.
> Personally, I don't like M$ seeing everything I am doing and tracking
> all my information.
> The stability and compatibility is great, yes - but you guys are
> up your privacy!could
> I thought that was important to everyone? Am I mistaken?
> With the introduction of XP, MS left all backdoors open so others
> watch what you are doing.are
> And by installing SP1 for XP, you give MS consent to do this!
> Same with 2000. Nice and stable, but by installing SP3 for it, you
> giving M$ the right to inspect your system whenever they want to.Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> I am forced to deal with Windows on a daily basis, but I would surely
> use Linux for myself.
> Xandros is a great OS for people to use instead of Windows.
> I'm not asking you to change your OS and start all over, but if your
> privacy is important, an upgrade to XP will absolutely NOT be in your
> future because of its privacy issues and security flaws.
> Don't think that simply by doing updates you are protected from the
> flaws of XP, especially if you are on a broadband connection.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>