Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [nslu2-linux] Re: atop

Expand Messages
  • mig mac
    Hi, I m running atop v1.23 on a couple Ubuntu systems and both show CPU totals over 100%. I believe that is the intended behavior. from the atop man page: CPU
    Message 1 of 8 , Nov 18, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      Hi,
      I'm running atop v1.23 on a couple Ubuntu systems and both show CPU totals over 100%.
      I believe that is the intended behavior.

      from the atop man page:

             CPU  CPU utilization.
                  At  least  one  line  is shown for the total occupation of all CPU’s
                  together....


      On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Don Muller <don@...> wrote:
       

      Sorry my desktop is Windoze. The only devices I have that run Linux are three
      NAS devices. Only one of them is dual core.



      -----Original Message-----
      From: nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com [mailto:nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
      Of slackline
      Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:50 AM
      To: nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [nslu2-linux] Re: atop

      --- In nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com, Don Muller <don@...> wrote:
      >
      > Hi,
      >
      > It's running on a QNAP NAS (x86). The feed is
      > http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/ts509/cross/stable/Packages.gz.

      Ok, so does the failure for the percentages to tally up happen on any other
      systems?

      Is your desktop computer multi-core? If so do you observe the same behaviour
      you've described with atop on that as you do on your QNAP?

      This would help identify whether the error is with atop in general or the
      specific build you are using.

      ------------------------------------

      Yahoo! Groups Links




      --
      Against logic there is no armor like ignorance.
      - Laurence J. Peter
    • Don Muller
      Maybe it s the intended behavior but is it the correct behavior? If one line, CPU, is intended to show the numbers for all cpus, in other words an overall
      Message 2 of 8 , Nov 18, 2009
      • 0 Attachment

        Maybe it’s the intended behavior but is it the correct behavior?  If one line, CPU, is intended to show the numbers for all cpus, in other words an overall view of the system, how can a system be over 100% idle or busy or …? Maybe a new line should be added that shows the average.

         

        From: nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com [mailto:nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of mig mac
        Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 1:12 PM
        To: nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: Re: [nslu2-linux] Re: atop

         



        Hi,
        I'm running atop v1.23 on a couple Ubuntu systems and both show CPU totals over 100%.
        I believe that is the intended behavior.

        from the atop man page:

               CPU  CPU utilization.
                    At  least  one  line  is shown for the total occupation of all CPU’s
                    together....

        On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Don Muller <don@...> wrote:

         

        Sorry my desktop is Windoze. The only devices I have that run Linux are three
        NAS devices. Only one of them is dual core.



        -----Original Message-----
        From: nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com [mailto:nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
        Of slackline

        Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:50 AM
        To: nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: [nslu2-linux] Re: atop

        --- In nslu2-linux@yahoogroups.com, Don Muller <don@...> wrote:

        >
        > Hi,
        >
        > It's running on a QNAP NAS (x86). The feed is
        >
        href="http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/ts509/cross/stable/Packages.gz." target="_blank">http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/ts509/cross/stable/Packages.gz.

        Ok, so does the failure for the percentages to tally up happen on any other
        systems?

        Is your desktop computer multi-core? If so do you observe the same behaviour
        you've described with atop on that as you do on your QNAP?

        This would help identify whether the error is with atop in general or the
        specific build you are using.

        ------------------------------------

        Yahoo! Groups Links




        --
        Against logic there is no armor like ignorance.
        - Laurence J. Peter



      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.