Re: OpenWRT endianness & ABI version?
- Hi Rod,
Thanks for your help; I now have this board up and running.
Rod Whitby wrote:
> Phil Endecott wrote:I've made some changes, including a comment that SlugOS/LE now seems to
>> OK, so when the Wiki says that "SlugOS/LE (formerly know as
>> DebianSlug), ... uses the Debian package repository"
>> (http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/SlugOS/HomePage"), is that totally
>> wrong or am I crazy? It looks to me very much as if it's using
>> OpenEmbedded packages, not Debian packages.
> SlugOS/LE uses the same set of packages as SlugOS/BE (just compiled with
> the opposite endianness). SlugOS (both BE and LE) can also use Optware
> Feel free to fix any pages you find that still have that (now incorrect)
> historical information on them.
have an incompatible ABI from Debian (see my other thread). Let me
know if there's anything major that I've missed. Does anyone have any
insight into this FP ABI thing?
>> I bet those openssh packages are taking a fair bit; can IThanks. It would be really useful to have dropbear available.
>> use dropbear? ipkg install dropbear says "can't find package"
> No, it should be. I'll look into why it isn't.
>> And, sticking out like a sore thumb, /var/lib/ipkg/crossI have gzipped my /var/lib/ipkg/cross which saves a huge amount of
> It's probably mostly the list of packages that can be installed, plus
> the info for all the packages that are already installed.
> As long as you never wanted to run ipkg update again (and only installed
> packages manually from local files), and never wanted to remove a
> package, then you could delete all that.
space. Unfortunately it would be necessary to have enough space to
gunzip it in order to use ipkg - e.g. to install dropbear - but I can
use the space temporarily.
I'm a bit surprised that this file size problem is not more often
complained about by the OE and Emdebian people; it's "low hanging
fruit" for saving space.