Re: enhanced ctorrent
- --- In email@example.com, "fransmeulenbroeks"
>Please correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't Optware/Unslung packages
> Fernando, unslung can use the same ctorrent patches and bb file to
> generate a package. The difference is in the paths where things are
built by a makefile instead of a .bb file?
> As it is now the patches are in ctorrent and are actually pushedAre you talking about the full dhn2 set of patches and the latest
> upstream to openembedded.
btfiles patch? These are the ones I used to build it for Optware.
> Given the current situation I propose to leave it as such.That's fine for me, we can end up with updated ctorrent packages for
> If the author of enhanced ctorrent comes with a good naming scheme and
> e.g. a download dir, I would happily make a new package, but if I look
> at the current homepage this does not seem well organised enough to
> serve as stable base for a package.
both Unslung and OpenSlug, instead of new ones.