Re: ipkg update error
- I hope you don't find me rude for asking, but what, in fact, is the difference between the current Cross-Feed package:
and the one I'm told to replace it with in message 8621:
I've just run a diff on the two pages, and the only difference is that the current Cross-Feed package has the "9base_4 " ipk. That's it.
I guess what I'm trying to understand is, how am I fixing a problem with the Native-Feed by replacing the current Cross-Feed with a link to an apparently identical Cross-Feed at a different location? Seems to me, at the moment, that simply commenting out the Native-Feed entry would suffice. Yes/No?
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "rolandkbs" <roland.krebs@...> wrote:
> Please look at message 8621 (http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/nslu2-general/message/8621)
> --- In email@example.com, "linksysslug" <sirquijote@> wrote:
> > Each time I run the "ipkg update" command, it returns an error. Here's the relevant output:
> > Downloading http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/nslu2/native/stable/Packages.gz
> > wget: server returned error: HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
> > An error ocurred, return value: 1.
> > Collected errors:
> > ipkg_download: ERROR: Command failed with return value 1: `wget --passive-ftp -q -P /tmp/ipkg-d6oypW http://ipkg.nslu2-linux.org/feeds/optware/nslu2/native/stable/Packages.gz'