Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

7743RE: [nslu2-general] New hardware to replace NSLU2

Expand Messages
  • Urban Cubbage
    Mar 2, 2009
    • 0 Attachment
      I would assume that since it is newer up to date hardware that they would
      have Wake-On-Lan which would use a lot less power since they would turn off
      most of the power after a time with no activity and turn back on with
      activity on Lan.

      I agree with most of the comments on this, I bought Slug because it was
      cheap and low power. The new stuff with have to have this also.

      Thank You


      -----Original Message-----
      From: nslu2-general@yahoogroups.com [mailto:nslu2-general@yahoogroups.com]
      On Behalf Of Hanneke & Paul Brandt
      Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 8:36 AM
      To: nslu2-general@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: RE: [nslu2-general] New hardware to replace NSLU2

      How about power consumption for these alternatives? For me the main reason
      for purchasing the slug was it's low power consumption!


      -----Original Message-----
      From: nslu2-general@yahoogroups.com [mailto:nslu2-general@yahoogroups.com]
      On Behalf Of Joel Gebhart
      Sent: dinsdag 24 februari 2009 21:38
      To: nslu2-general@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: [nslu2-general] New hardware to replace NSLU2

      Hi All,

      I've wondered what I will do when my slug dies to replace it. A
      hardware refresh would be nice anyway since the slug hardware is
      somewhat sluggish. Has anyone else seen this?

      http://linuxdevices <http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS9634061300.html>

      It seems like the perfect replacement/upgrade for the slug hardware. I
      wish I had the expertise to trailblaze with it, but I have too many
      other projects right now, and no expertise in compiling Linux.

      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


      Yahoo! Groups Links
    • Show all 27 messages in this topic