Fw: Shelters kill adoptable animals
- -----Original Message-----
From: tacitus, Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:38:22 -0700
[mailto:Letters @ sfchronicle.com]
People are furious and shocked beyond belief that People for the Ethical
Treatment of Animals (PETA) euthanizes animals, but what do these same
people think is happening in non-PETA shelters all over the country?
Unfortunately, euthanasia is often done incorrectly, causing animals to
suffer due to lack of funding or lack of caring. PETA has paid hundreds
of thousands of dollars to “fix” shelters as much they can be fixed,
but that’s not enough. Since PETA is absolutely against animal
suffering, they gently and humanely kill animals that are going to die
anyway to prevent them from dying on the streets from starvation, death
by car, human abuse or disease.
Approximately eight million animals will enter shelters in the United
States this year and there are not 8 million homes anxiously looking for
a companion animal. Until the country takes responsibility for the
massive dog and cat overpopulation, killing will be a way of life for
every town in the United States.
They have several other letters needing signers, too.
> -----Original Message----------------------------------------------
> From: tacitus
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 5:33 PM
> To: Alex Bury; Valerie Mizuhara
> Subject: Re:
> Aw, I'm on the floor! Talk about shocked and amazed!
> Okay, you two, do I have the SF Gate article and the letter lifted from
> your thesis?
> And did you look at the sweet sweet thing I sent you - for anyone who's
> ever loved a dog?
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Alex Bury [mailto:AlexB@...]
>> To: tacitus ; Valerie Mizuhara
>> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 2:28 PM
>> Subject: RE:
>> this will shock and amaze you but I swear I didn't, it's from the
>> Writer's Group at PETA. I know it looks like mine--the length--but
>> when you read you know it's not because it actually makes sense and
>> isn't redundant. Yes, they are sending this out to other people, so
>> you can post.
>> And thank you.
>> (they took one of my 3,000 word essays, or perhaps I should call it a
>> thesis, and turned it into a 200 word letter to the editor in less
>> than an hour, for SF Gate after this morning's article) (PETA Writers
>> hate me but I sure love them!!)
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: tacitus
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 5:23 PM
>>> To: Alex Bury; Valerie Mizuhara
>>> Subject: Re:
>>> You wrote this, right? (Smiley face here). It's long, that's how
>>> I know.
>>> So it's ready to go to AR-News, yes?
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Alex Bury [mailto:AlexB@...]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 2:19 PM
>>>> Subject: RE:
>>>> Thank you for contacting PETA about the North Carolina situation.
>>>> That means you care, and we wish everyone did.
>>>> Please forgive this form response. We are getting hundreds of e-mail
>>>> messages, calls, and letters every day about all sorts of issues,
>>>> which means that it is impossible to reply to each one personally.
>>>> We do want to underscore the fact that despite this form response,
>>>> we take your concerns very seriously, and all comments we receive
>>>> regarding this situation are being reviewed by our senior staff as
>>>> well as staff involved in our Domestic Animals Department.
>>>> First, the report from North Carolina regarding the dumping of
>>>> animal bodies in a Dumpster by a PETA staff member is deeply
>>>> upsetting and just plain wrong. It is against PETA’s policy to put
>>>> the bodies of euthanized animals in Dumpsters, as you might imagine,
>>>> and we are appalled that a member of our staff apparently did that.
>>>> Despite the fact that we know this woman to be a caring soul and
>>>> someone who has done much selfless work to help animals, there is no
>>>> excuse for what happened. As an initial result, she has been
>>>> suspended. We have launched our own investigation of the
>>>> circumstances surrounding this case.
>>>> Because there has also been a great deal of misinformation in the
>>>> news about this case and its circumstances, we want to provide you
>>>> with some additional background information—something the media
>>>> has not done.
>>>> We started working in North Carolina in 2000, after PETA was
>>>> contacted by a police officer who was distressed by conditions in a
>>>> county pound. North Carolina has the second-highest rate per capita
>>>> of euthanasia in the country—35 animals killed annually for every
>>>> 1,000 residents. Most do not die a humane death. When we step in to
>>>> humanely euthanize animals—at no cost to the participating
>>>> shelters—as we did in this instance, our involvement prevents
>>>> animals from being shot to death with a .22 caliber pistol, being
>>>> gassed to death in an old, rusty metal box, injected with a
>>>> paralytic that causes slow suffocation without loss of
>>>> consciousness, suffering for weeks on end from disease and illness,
>>>> or worse. In some of those places, dogs had drowned in floods and
>>>> frozen to death in winter.
>>>> We are a “shelter of last resort,” offering a humane death to
>>>> animals who would otherwise suffer a slow and painful end.
>>>> To learn more about the conditions that led to our involvement in
>>>> these North Carolina counties, and some of the many improvements
>>>> we’ve been able to make, please visit
>>>> Sadly, the shelters we work with in North Carolina also have no
>>>> adoption programs or hours set aside for adoption. In fact, most of
>>>> them have no staff on site. PETA has begged for years, through
>>>> formal proposals and numerous meetings, for officials to allow us to
>>>> implement an adoption program as part of a larger picture of shelter
>>>> improvements that would also include a spay/neuter program, a humane
>>>> education program, 24/7 emergency services, and rabies clinics.
>>>> It is important to add that PETA does not run an adoption facility
>>>> ourselves—we refer most adoptable animals to known shelters open
>>>> to public traffic, although we have managed to place 360 animals in
>>>> excellent, lifelong homes in just the past year. There is, in fact,
>>>> a North Carolina dog called Dovey in our office as I write this.
>>>> It is also PETA policy that no one on our staff is ever to give
>>>> anyone the impression that animals we accept are being taken for
>>>> placement. From what we have been able to determine in this
>>>> situation, the shelters from which our staff picked up the dogs were
>>>> fully aware of this fact, although it may be politic for them to
>>>> deny that now, given the outcry. It is our policy as well that the
>>>> vast majority of animals we accept are only those who are in
>>>> terrible conditions or unadoptable for some reason, such as
>>>> aggression or sickness in old age.
>>>> We wish that there were other options available. We cannot bring the
>>>> majority of animals back to Virginia for placement. The same issues
>>>> regarding adoptability of injured, sick, or old animals exist
>>>> everywhere, including here, and “all-admission” shelters (those
>>>> which, unlike “turn-away”—so-called “no-kill”—shelters,
>>>> never turn their backs on any animal) are, as in the rest of the
>>>> country, already unable to cope with the overpopulation of unwanted
>>>> animals and cannot find enough homes for all of them. Using Virginia
>>>> shelters also means that there would be fewer homes for animals
>>>> already in Virginia adoption facilities.
>>>> Some might argue that the solution to this crisis of overpopulation
>>>> of so many unwanted animals is to open sanctuaries. But the sad
>>>> reality is that the math doesn’t add up. There is not enough money
>>>> available to us or anyone to build enough sanctuaries or organize
>>>> enough animal-adoption programs to keep up with the number of
>>>> unwanted animals, particularly those animals deemed
>>>> “undesirable” because of their infirmities, age, or behavior.
>>>> And putting all your resources into fostering and kenneling unwanted
>>>> animals does nothing to stop the flow of more and more unwanteds.
>>>> The source of the problem—trying to stop future unwanteds from
>>>> being born—is where the money needs to go.
>>>> We believe that the spaying and neutering of animals, supported by
>>>> appropriate local laws, is the single most effective tool in
>>>> reducing the number of unwanted animals. For that reason, our humane
>>>> education and outreach programs promote spaying and neutering. Our
>>>> goal is to create a society where every dog and cat has a loving
>>>> home. We have always advocated fixing the problems of overpopulation
>>>> through practical methods, including encouraging people not to
>>>> patronize pet shops or breeders. Those stories, however, rarely get
>>>> coverage in the media.
>>>> As well as paying for sterilization of animals in North Carolina, we
>>>> run a mobile spay/neuter clinic here in Virginia seven days a week.
>>>> It focuses much of its work in disadvantaged neighborhoods, where we
>>>> offer free and low-cost surgeries and other services such as
>>>> flea/tick treatments and wormings. In the last year, we have
>>>> sterilized more than 7,600 dogs and cats, including feral
>>>> animals—many free of charge and all others at well below our own
>>>> costs. To date, we have sterilized nearly 25,000 in our clinic.
>>>> Support for this program is much needed, as you can imagine.
>>>> PETA has always spoken openly about euthanasia, on our Web site and
>>>> in our publications, and—while we understand that it is upsetting
>>>> to learn about—it is necessary in this imperfect world, and we
>>>> hope you understand that it is gut-wrenching for those of us at PETA
>>>> and at shelters across the country who care deeply for animals to
>>>> have to hold animals in our arms and take their lives because there
>>>> is nowhere decent for them to go. Euthanasia will continue to be
>>>> necessary until people prevent dogs and cats from bringing new
>>>> litters into the world and as long as people hide their heads in the
>>>> sand and leave the dirty work to others.
>>>> We hope this has shed some light on what happened, our policies, and
>>>> our work. Our Web site http://www.HelpingAnimals.com
>>>> [http://www.helpinganimals.com/] may also be useful for additional
>>>> information. Thank you for caring enough to ask about this.
>>>> The PETA Staff
>>>> http://www.PETA.org [http://www.peta.org/]
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: tacitus
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 5:17 PM
>>>>> To: Alex Bury; Valerie Mizuhara
>>>>> Subject: Re:
>>>>> Cannot open. Can you send text or another way?
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: Alex Bury [mailto:AlexB@...]
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 2:05 PM
>>>>>> <<letter addressing euth in NC>>
>>>>>> Alex Bury
>>>>>> People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
>>>>>> 501 Front Street
>>>>>> Norfolk, VA 23510
>>>>>> www.Peta25.com [http://www.Peta25.com]
>>>>>> Be informed: www.Peta.org [http://www.Peta.org]
>>>>>> If slaughterhouses had glass walls, everyone would be vegetarian.
>>>>>> Linda McCartney
>>>>>> *Please include all previous correspondence in new messages.*
The new Pro-Animal-Rights group -
MY GROUPS -
MY NEW GROUP -