Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Live Free or Die Hard (Len Wiseman, 2007)

Expand Messages
  • noelbotevera
    Just die already Noel Vera Never been a big fan of the Die Hard movies--well, Alan Rickman in the first made for a memorably witty villain, the outrageous
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 13, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      Just die already

      Noel Vera

      Never been a big fan of the "Die Hard" movies--well, Alan Rickman in
      the first made for a memorably witty villain, the outrageous escapes
      and climactic explosions in the second outstripped the first (at the
      expense of the first's token attempts at realism, of course), New
      York City was put to good use in the third (which also had this
      wonderful idea--fairly well realized--about bombs with riddle-
      activated detonators)--but no, not a big fan. They're loud, they're
      obvious, and once in a while they allow the action to grind to a
      halt while the main character--one John McClane, ostensibly of the
      NYPD but with training that seems more Delta Force than police
      academy--grouses about how lousy life and the police department has
      treated him.

      This fourth installment is pretty much more of the same. Willis
      seems to want to prove that at fifty-two he can still cut it as an
      action hero when this could have been a wonderful opportunity to
      show a fifty-two-year-old man cutting it as an action hero--that's
      what made Sylvester Stallone's "Rocky Balboa" partway affecting, as
      half of an effective drama on advancing age (the second half being
      an old (and not in a good way) retread of the Rocky clich├ęs). So: no
      blood pressure pill jokes, no constipation jokes, no Viagra jokes;
      maybe one or two lukewarm jabs at McClane's taste in music, but not
      even a hint or suggestion that maybe the knees aren't bending as
      readily as before, the ticker beating as steadily as before, or that
      nervy trigger finger squeezing perhaps a touch slower than before--
      no siree. The filmmakers have always been proud to present a human-
      sized protagonist, able to feel pain and not a little suffering, but
      this guy shrugs off shrapnel and gunshot wounds like water off a
      duck's back (as Clark Kent might put it when shot with a .38
      revolver: "Huh?").

      This time McClane is faced-to-face not with mortality but with
      obsolescence; he is, as the villain Thomas Gabriel (a miscast
      Timothy Olyphant) puts it "a Timex watch in a digital age." The
      terror this time isn't exploding buildings or crashing planes or
      bombs set to go off if a riddle is improperly answered, but computer-
      hacked control systems, able to wreak havoc with rogue traffic
      lights and massive blackouts up and down the Eastern seaboard of the
      United States.

      It's a fairly chilling scenario mainly based on a ten-year-old Wired
      article "A Farewell to Arms," by John Carlin, about the possibility
      of an Information War, or an assault on the communication networks
      of the United States: massive gridlocked traffic, grounded airlines,
      panic in Wall Street, uncoordinated emergency service and military
      units, chaos and confusion everywhere. The future belongs to the
      digitally aware, and when someone starts messing with that
      awareness, civilization itself is threatened.

      Enter John McClane, who has trouble maintaining his 401k retirement
      fund, much less keeping up with all this computer crap; he's asked
      to deliver a young computer hacker named Matt Farell (Justin Long,
      who acts in Apple Computer ads) from Farell's apartment in New
      Jersey to Washington DC, where he's wanted for questioning on a
      computer breach. The simple transport assignment quickly escalates
      when silent killers are sent to eliminate Farell; McClane, whose
      middle name seems to be 'morose' when he's in-between adventures,
      lumbers yet again into action.

      Even this lesser idea of analog vs. digital might have made for a
      fairly interesting action flick, but the script cheats by almost
      immediately providing McClane with an expert advisor on hand to tell
      him all about those nasty computerized hazards; in effect McClane is
      left doing what he was originally assigned to do: transport said
      whiz kid from one place to another so he can tap away at yet another
      keyboard and set things right (I'd love to see at least an actual
      monkey wrench dropped into actual set of gears at one point in the
      movie, but the filmmakers wouldn't even oblige that much). The Final
      Confrontation is mostly your standard-issue face-off at gunpoint; it
      lacks the gee-whiz punchline quality of the second movie (possibly
      my favorite, if you pressed a gun to my head and demanded I choose),
      where a cigarette lighter and a crisp "Yipee kay-yay, mother--"
      whatever turned the terrorists' soon-to-be realized dreams into
      ashes. The Unlikely Escape is if anything TOO elaborate, involving a
      spiraling freeway, a ten-wheeler, a hovering F-35 Lightning, and so
      many unlikely breaks you wonder if McClane (or at least the director
      and scriptwriters) had to go through several boxfuls of rewrites
      before they came up with a solution even halfway plausible--as is,
      it seems several screenplay drafts short (again, the second movie's
      explosive ejection-seat getaway is--for me, anyway--the best (or at
      least the most amusing) in the series).

      Director John McTiernan, a serviceable Hollywood craftsman, chose
      not to do this fourth installment; Renny Harlin, who did the fairly
      kinetic first sequel wasn't tapped either (Harlin's done so many bad
      films since ("Cuthroat Island" and that "Exorcist" prequel, anyone?)
      that "Die Hard 2" is starting to look like his masterpiece).
      Directing chores instead fell upon Len Wiseman, whose previous
      credits include the much-maligned (and not without
      cause) "Underworld" movies. Like Harlin, this may be Wiseman's
      finest moment--the action is reasonably coherent, the butt-kicking
      fairly witty (one man is knocked off his helicopter perch by an
      uncorked fire hydrant, another has his hands frozen is dropped into
      a pair of whirling fan blades). Ironically, this "analog hero for a
      digital age" boasts of plenty of digital effects, most of them meant
      to make what looks like a series of fairly elaborate stunts look
      more dangerous than they really are.

      It's plenty of huffing and puffing, all to little avail. I'm not
      sure why Willis is even doing this; he's proven time and time again
      that unlike Stallone or Schwarzenegger he's often been a lively and
      interesting character actor; he doesn't need to climb out of his
      wheelchair to do yet another action flick (and as I've said before,
      it would've been a more interesting film if he'd stayed in his
      chair). He's got nothing to prove, so why do this at all--to make
      even more money on top of the millions he's already earned? "Live
      Free and Die Hard" is the fourth in what for me has always been a
      pointless action series; high time to drive a stake through its
      heart, cut off its head, give it a proper burial.

      (First published in Businessworld, 7/6/07)

      (Comments? Email me at noelbotevera@...)
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.