Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Harry Potter

Expand Messages
  • Noel Vera
    Harry Potter: A Report Card Noel Vera On the film adaptation of the book Harry Potter And The Sorcerer s Stone: we have seen how, in the aftermath of the
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 22, 2001
    • 0 Attachment
      Harry Potter: A Report Card

      Noel Vera

      On the film adaptation of the book "Harry Potter And The Sorcerer's Stone:"
      we have seen how, in the aftermath of the September 11 tragedy, Hollywood
      producers have veered away from realism and more thoughtful fare to
      concentrate instead on fantasy and light comedy. We have seen how J.K.
      Rowlings' successful series, about a young boy training to be a wizard, is
      considered prime candidate for such a transformation.

      What follows is a breakdown of the various elements of the resulting
      picture, evaluated accordingly:

      The Hype:

      The film's studio, Warner Brothers, has spared no expense in promoting the
      film to high heavens, taking full advantage of the book's near-omnipresence
      to crank out spin-off merchandise--dolls, magic toys, "Harry Potter" fashion
      accessories, etc., etc. Already the studio has boasted of the film's
      breaking box-office records for highest opening, fastest-growing receipts,
      etc., etc.

      In terms of marketing and publicity, the studio is granted a full fifty
      points for a final score of "A+"--with a warning that said score does not in
      any way contribute to the picture's final grade at the end of this report
      (For a full explication of this policy, please refer to Appendix G of the
      "Scoring Procedures and Policy" Manual, entitled "Boxoffice Means Nada To

      The Novel

      J.K. Rowlings' book, which the evaluator has not read, enjoys great
      popularity, and judging from what can be seen onscreen, one can guess why.
      Rowlings presents a boy living under hard circumstances--his parents lost,
      his own self oppressed by an uncaring aunt and uncle--rising to the position
      of most promising student in a school for wizardry. The image evokes
      everything from Tolkien (with his humble young Hobbit who discovers the One
      Ring) to C.S. Lewis (children becoming princes and princesses) in popular
      fantasy, with Rowlings emphasizing along the way loyalty to one's friends
      (Tolkien began his famous trilogy with "The Fellowship of the Ring"). She
      draws from potent sources, apparently, and proof positive of this is the
      millions she has enthralled with her brew.

      Fifty points for the story, with fifteen points held in reserve, as the
      original novel remains unread, for a final grade of "B+" (those who protest
      the unfairness of this verdict ("it's not the film's fault that you haven't
      read the book!") should read Appendix H of the Manual, entitled "A Movie
      Should Stand On Its Own Two Feet").

      The Actors:

      The actors--Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson deserve high
      praise for being able to distinguish themselves from the surrounding special
      effects (Watson, apparently, has long, curly hair). Radcliffe should be
      singled out for his honest portrayal of Potter, his ability to charm without
      trying too hard, and his winning reserve. The supporting cast--which
      includes Ian Hart, John Cleese, Robbie Coltrane, Richard Harris, Maggie
      Smith and, above all, Alan Rickman with his incurably warped sneer--deserve
      even higher praise for the much-needed color they lend to the proceedings.
      Thirty-five points, for a final grade of "B+."

      The Director:

      Chris Columbus, who operates under the considerable handicap of thirty
      negative points for writing "Home Alone," "Goonies" and "Young Sherlock
      Holmes;" for directing "Mrs. Doubtfire," "Stepmom," and "Bicentennial Man,"
      for writing AND directing the odious "Nine Months" (Mr. Columbus would have
      had a negative score by now, had he not been granted points for writing the
      two "Gremlins" movies), does a remarkable job of not wrecking the Rowlings
      novel irreparably. "Not committing an irreparable blunder" can also be an
      achievement, especially in the context of alleged "filmmaker's" career (for
      a full explanation and irreproachable proof, please see any of the above).
      Columbus realized the gold he held in his hand, and treated it with proper
      respect; for this much he is awarded a full five points, for a final grade
      of C- (those who argue "a director should be judged for his work at hand
      instead of past "mistakes" (to put the matter kindly)!" should refer to
      Appendix I of the Manual: "Nobody Has Seen The Bad Movies I've Seen").

      The Special Effects:

      For basically giving the film's magic an undistinguished look, for staging a
      game of "Quiddich"--essentially a game of rugby played on flying
      broomsticks--like a "Phantom Menace" pod race, where the camera basically
      follows the character as he goes through the usual roller-coaster loops and
      spins (a pity, because the game of Quiddich features some fairly witty and
      eccentric rules), the special effects of the picture are penalized forty
      points for a final grade of "D."

      The Music Score:

      From so-called composer John Williams, the score is loud and obtrusive and
      covers the film from end to end like cheap wallpaper. It signals "SCARY!"
      when Potter enters some eerie section of Hogwart Castle, signals "FUNNY!"
      when we are shown some shenanigans with a Troll, and "MOVING!" every time
      Potter sees his dead parents. Williams should be banned from all
      productions in the near future and condemned to watching Dogme 95 films for
      instruction as to the proper use of music in a movie. Fifty points
      deduction, for a final grade of "F."

      Final Grade

      Adding up the scores from all elements, we have´┐Żbut who's counting? Final
      grade is "C," which can be interpreted as: "not bad, could be better, get a
      real filmmaker--Tim Burton, Jeunet and Caro, or even Steven Spielberg--for
      the sequel" (those who dispute this grade are referred to Appendix J of the
      Manual, "The Critic Is Always Right Within the Confines of His Article").

      (Comments? Email me at noelbotevera@...)

      Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.