Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

FW: SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO GET CDL!!!!

Expand Messages
  • Luis Ewing
    From Luis Ewing at [rcwcodebuster (at) gmail.com] or [rcwcodebuster (at) live.com] or [rcwcodebuster (at) comcast.net] or [rcwcodebuster (at) hotmail.com] or
    Message 1 of 1 , Dec 17, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      From Luis Ewing at [rcwcodebuster (at) gmail.com] or [rcwcodebuster (at) live.com] or [rcwcodebuster (at) comcast.net] or [rcwcodebuster (at) hotmail.com] or [rcwcodebuster (at) yahoo.com] or [rcwcodebuster (at) aol.com] or [rcwcodebuster (at) mail.com] or telephone: (253) 226-3741 or (360) 353-4846 or call me on SKYPE at [luisewing]

      Web Sites under construction: [www.luisewing.com] or [www.ultimateusers.com]


      GODS LAW as written in the 1599 GENEVA BIBLE at [http://www.americanvision (D0T) com] says:


      "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast refused knowledge, I will also refuse thee that thou shall be no Priest to me: and seeing thou hast forgotten the Law of thy God, I will also forget thy children." Hosea 4:6

      "And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: . . ." Revelations 18:4

      "Then Peter and the Apostles answered, and said, We ought rather to obey God than men." Acts, 5:29

      "Draw near to God, and he will draw near to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners, and purge your hearts, ye double minded." James 5:8

      "And if it seem evil unto you to serve the Lord, choose you this day whom ye will serve, whether the gods which your fathers served (that were beyond the flood) or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but I and mine house will serve the Lord." Joshua 24:15

      "No servant can serve two masters: for either he shall hate the one, and love the other: or else he shall lean to the one, and despise the other, Ye cannot serve God and riches." Luke 16:13

      "Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers: for there is no power but of God: and the powers that be, are ordained of God." Romans 13:1

      "Whoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist, shall receive to themselves condemnation." Romans 13:2

      "Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the ordinances of the world, why, as though ye lived in the world, are ye burdened with traditions?" Colossians 2:20

      "As, Touch not, Taste not, Handle not." Colossians 2:21

      "Which all perish with the using, and are after the commandments and doctrines of men." Colossians 2:22

      "And putting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, he even took it out of the way, and fastened it upon the cross, . . ." Colossians 2: 14.

      "That we henceforth be no more children, wavering and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the deceit of men, and with crafttiness, whereby they lay in wait to deceive." Ephesians, 4:14

      "And we know, that the Law is good, if a man use it lawfully." Timothy, 1:8

      "Think not that I am come to destroy the Law, or the Prophets. I am not come to destroy them, but to fulfill them." Mathews 5:17.



      SUBJECT: LUIS EWING'S . . . NEW RIGHT TO OBTAIN . . . "A DRIVERS LICENSE" . . . "A COMMERCIAL DRIVERS LICENSE" . . . AND . . . "A WASHINGTON STATE ID CARD" . . . WITHOUT HAVING TO PROVIDE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBER FLYER !!!!


      HEY EVERYBODY, GUESS WHAT????


      YOU ARE GOING TO LOVE TO HEAR THIS NEW NEWS!!!!


      The former fake federal law is:


      "TITLE 42 USC § 666 CHAPTER 7 - SOCIAL SECURITY Part D -"



      WE CAN ALL NOW START SUING ALL 50 STATE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING FOR THE FRAUDULENT & DECEPTIVE PRACTICE OF FALSELY LEADING ALL OF US TO BELIEVE THAT YOU ARE ALLEGEDLY REQUIRED BY . . . FEDERAL LAW . . . TO OBTAIN . . . A DRIVERS LICENSE . . . OR . . . A COMMERCIAL DRIVERS LICENSE . . . OR . . . A STATE ID CARD!!!!


      See the former fake federal law 42 U.S.C. 666 at subsection (13) which reads:


      "42 US 666 (13) Recording of social security numbers in certain family matters.— Procedures requiring that the social security number of—
      (A) any applicant for a professional license, driver's license, occupational license, recreational license, or marriage license be recorded on the application; . . ."


      I HAVE DISCOVERED THAT THE JEWISH STATE BAR ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS WHO ARE RUNNING THE UNITED STATES CORPORATION AND ALL 50 STATE CORPORATIONS PRETENDING TO BE OUR LAWFUL GOVERNMENT HAVE LIED TO US AGAIN!!!!


      Jews May Lie to Non-Jews, Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a Gentile. - Talmud: Baba Kamma 113a


      Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording. – Talmud: Schabouth Hag. 6b.


      Jews must always try to deceive Christians. – Talmud: Zohar 1,160a


      "Who took an oath in the presence of goys, the robbers, and the custom-house officer, is not responsible." TALMUD: Tosefta Szebnot, 11.


      "One should and must make false oath, when the goyim ask if our books contain anything against them. Then we are bound to state on oath that there is nothing like that." TALMUD: Utszabot. The Book of Jore Dia, 17.


      "To wit, for the false brethren which were craftily sent in, and crept in prively to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage." Galatians 2:4


      "Let him that stole, steal no more: but let him rather labor, and work with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give unto him that needeth." Ephesians 5:28


      "And he said, Woe be to you also, ye Lawyers: for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burden with one of your fingers." Luke 11:46


      "Woe be to you, Lawyers: for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that came in, ye forbade." Luke 11:52


      "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do: he hath been a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, then speaketh of he of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof." John 8:44


      THE GOVERNMENT LIED TO US????


      NO, TELL ME, THIS CAN'T BE TRUE????


      THE GOVERNMENT WOULDN'T LIE TO US, THAT CAN'T BE TRUE, HA, HA!!!!


      DO YOU THINK I AM BEING FUNNY????


      IT IS NOW UNDISPUTED THAT . . . "YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED" . . . BY . . . "FEDERAL LAW" . . . TO GIVE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO OBTAIN . . . "A REGULAR DRIVERS LICENSE" . . . "A COMMERCIAL DRIVERS LICENSE" . . . OR EVEN JUST . . . "A STATE ID CARD."


      I have discovered that you are not in fact and law actually required to give . . . A SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBER . . . in order to obtain . . . A DRIVERS LICENSE . . . A COMMERCIAL DRIVERS LICENSE . . . A FISHING LICENSE . . . A HUNTING LICENSE . . . A GENERAL CONTRACTORS LICENSE . . . A ROOFING LICENSE . . . A PLUMBERS LICENSE . . . A ELECTRICIANS LICENSE . . . A DOCTORS LICENSE . . . or even just . . . A STATE ID CARD!!!!



      ALL THE JEW ATTORNEYS WILL LIE TO YOU AND TELL YOU THAT FEDERAL LAW AT . . . 42 U.S.C. 405 (c)(2)(C)(i) . . . AND . . . 42 U.S.C. 666 (a) . . . REQUIRES YOU PROVIDE A SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBER TO GET . . . A DRIVERS LICENSE!!!!


      Jews May Lie to Non-Jews, Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a Gentile. - Talmud: Baba Kamma 113a


      Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording. – Talmud: Schabouth Hag. 6b.


      Jews must always try to deceive Christians. – Talmud: Zohar 1,160a

      "Who took an oath in the presence of goys, the robbers, and the custom-house officer, is not responsible." TALMUD: Tosefta Szebnot, 11.


      "One should and must make false oath, when the goyim ask if our books contain anything against them. Then we are bound to state on oath that there is nothing like that." TALMUD: Utszabot. The Book of Jore Dia, 17.


      "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do: he hath been a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, then speaketh of he of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof." John 8:44


      "But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land before you, then those which ye let remain of them, shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell." Numbers 33:55


      "And the Lord thy God shall give them before thee, then thou shalt smite them: thou shalt utterly destroy them: thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor have compassion on them," Deuteronomy 7:2


      ALL THE JEW ATTORNEYS WILL LIE TO YOU AND TELL YOU THAT THE FEDERAL LAW SPECIFICALLY . . . "THE TAX REFORM ACT OF 1976" . . . ALLOWS THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES TO ALLEGEDLY REQUIRED THAT YOU PROVIDE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER IN ORDER TO OBTAIN YOUR DRIVERS LICENSE OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF PROFESSIONAL OR COMMERCIAL LICENSE!!!!


      Jews May Lie to Non-Jews, Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a Gentile. - Talmud: Baba Kamma 113a


      Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording. – Talmud: Schabouth Hag. 6b.


      Jews must always try to deceive Christians. – Talmud: Zohar 1,160a


      "Who took an oath in the presence of goys, the robbers, and the custom-house officer, is not responsible." TALMUD: Tosefta Szebnot, 11.


      "One should and must make false oath, when the goyim ask if our books contain anything against them. Then we are bound to state on oath that there is nothing like that." TALMUD: Utszabot. The Book of Jore Dia, 17.


      "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do: he hath been a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, then speaketh of he of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof." John 8:44


      "But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land before you, then those which ye let remain of them, shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell." Numbers 33:55


      "And the Lord thy God shall give them before thee, then thou shalt smite them: thou shalt utterly destroy them: thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor have compassion on them," Deuteronomy 7:2


      IT IS UNDISPUTED THAT . . . "THE TAX REFORM ACT OF 1976" . . . WAS ONLY PASSED BY THE HOUSE AT . . . "(H.R. 10612, 94th Congress, Public law 94-455) (1976)" . . . AND IS ONLY HALF A LAW BECAUSE IT WAS NOT PASSED BY THE SENATE, THEREFORE IT'S NOT LAW PERIOD!!!!


      "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do: he hath been a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, then speaketh of he of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof." John 8:44


      "But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land before you, then those which ye let remain of them, shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell." Numbers 33:55


      "And the Lord thy God shall give them before thee, then thou shalt smite them: thou shalt utterly destroy them: thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor have compassion on them," Deuteronomy 7:2


      Jews May Lie to Non-Jews, Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a Gentile. - Talmud: Baba Kamma 113a


      Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording. – Talmud: Schabouth Hag. 6b.


      Jews must always try to deceive Christians. – Talmud: Zohar 1,160a


      "Who took an oath in the presence of goys, the robbers, and the custom-house officer, is not responsible." TALMUD: Tosefta Szebnot, 11.


      "One should and must make false oath, when the goyim ask if our books contain anything against them. Then we are bound to state on oath that there is nothing like that." TALMUD: Utszabot. The Book of Jore Dia, 17.


      ALL THE JEW ATTORNEYS WHO WORK FOR THE STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE ARE INTENTIONALLY MISLEADING AND LYING TO ALL OUR STATE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING REPRESENTATIVES WHEN THEY TELL THEM THAT . . . FEDERAL LAW . . . ALLEGEDLY REQUIRES EVERYONE TO PROVIDE THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER IN ORDER TO OBTAIN . . . A REGULAR DRIVERS LICENSE . . . A COMMERCIAL DRIVERS LICENSE . . . A STATE ID CARD . . . OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF . . . PROFESSIONAL . . . OR . . . COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LICENSE!!!!!


      Well guess what I discovered????


      I HAVE DISCOVERED THAT CONGRESS HAS NEVER PASSED . . . 42 U.S.C. 405 (c)(2)(C)(i) . . . INTO POSITIVE LAW!!!!


      42 U.S.C. 405 (c)(2)(C)(i) . . . IS . . . A FAKE FEDERAL LAW!!!!


      42 U.S.C. 405 (c)(2)(C)(i) . . . IS NOT . . . AN ACT OF CONGRESS!!!!


      42 U.S.C. 405 (c)(2)(C)(i) . . . IS . . . A PHONY FEDERAL LAW!!!!


      I HAVE ALSO DISCOVERED THAT CONGRESS HAS NEVER PASSED . . . 42 U.S.C. 666 (a) . . . INTO POSITIVE LAW!!!!


      42 U.S.C. 666 (a) . . . IS . . . A FAKE FEDERAL LAW!!!!


      42 U.S.C. 666 (a) . . . IS NOT . . . AN ACT OF CONGRESS!!!!


      42 U.S.C. 666 (a) . . . IS . . . A PHONY FEDERAL LAW!!!!


      YES, THAT RIGHTS RIGHT, YOU GOT IT, TITLE 42 ET SEQ., THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT . . . IS NOT . . . AN ACT OF CONGRESS!!!!


      TITLE 42 ET SEQ., THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT IS . . . A FAKE FEDERAL LAW!!!!


      NOW, I HAVE EVEN MORE GOOD NEWS!!!!


      SECTION 7 OF THE 1974 PRIVACY ACT COMES FROM TITLE 5 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE AND IS AN ACT OF CONGRESS THAT WAS PASSED INTO POSITIVE LAW!!!!


      5 U.S.C. 552 (a) . . . is an ACT OF CONGRESS that was passed into POSITIVE LAW!!!!


      SECTION 7 OF THE 1974 PRIVACY ACT IS APPLICABLE TO . . . ALL STATES AND LOCAL AGENCIES!!!!


      TITLE 1, SECTION 204 (a) IS ALSO AN ACT OF CONGRESS THAT WAS PASSED INTO POSITIVE LAW BY CONGRESS!!!!


      1 U.S.C. 204 (a) . . . is an ACT OF CONGRESS that was passed into POSITIVE LAW!!!!


      WE HAVE NO LESS THAN . . . TWO (2) ACTS OF CONGRESS . . . THAT SUPERCEDE AND PREVAIL OVER . . . 42 U.S.C. 405 (c)(2)(C)(i) . . . AND . . . 42 U.S.C. 666 (a).


      "The Code is only prima facie evidence of the laws of the United States. 1 U.S.C. § 204 (a). Where an inconsistency between the United States Code and the Statutes at Large appears, the Statutes at Large prevail over the Code. Stephan v. United States, 319 U.S. 423, 426, 63 S.Ct. 1135, 87 L.Ed. 1490 (1943)." Peart v. Motor Vessell Bering Explorer, 373 F.Supp. 927, at 928 (April 12, 1974). And;

      "Statute law, as adopted by the legislature, prevails over a restatement thereof in the code. RCW 1.04.020-.021." STATE EX REL. ETC. v. MERCER ISL., 58 Wn. (2d) 141, 144 (April 20, 1961.) And;

      "But the legislature specifically disclaimed any intention to change the meaning of any statute. The compilers of the code were not empowered by congress to amend existing law, and doubtless had no thought of doing so ..." ...the act before us does not purport to amend a section of an act, but only a section of a compilation entitled "REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON," WHICH IS NOT THE LAW. Such an act purporting to amend only a section of the prima facie compilation leaves the law unchanged. En Banc." PAROSA v. TACOMA, 57 Wn.(2d) 409 (Dec.22, 1960). See also In re Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn.(2d) 261-266 (January 17, 1963). And;


      YES, THAT'S RIGHT, WE HAVE NO LESS THAN . . . TWO (2) ACTS OF CONGRESS . . . THAT SUPERCEDE AND PREVAIL OVER . . . THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT!!!!!


      "As pointed out by Mr. Justice Thompson v. U.S., 12 Pet. 524, 625, 9 L.Ed. 1181, and referred to with approval in the case of In re Heath, 144 U.S. 92, 12 S.Ct. 615, 36 L.Ed. 358, it is permissible and not an uncommon practice for a legislative body to adopt by reference other legislative acts; but "such adoption has always been considered as referring to the law existing at the time of adoption; and no subsequent legislation has ever been supposed to affect it. And such must necessarily be the effect and operation of such adoption; no other rule would furnish any certainty as to what was the law; and would be adopting prospectively, all changes that might be made in the law." [2] The fact that part of section 5438 of the Revised Statutes which contains the amendment of October 23, 1918, appears in the United States Code as section 80 of title 18, and that the same compilation contains sections 3490 and 3491 of the Revised Statutes as sections 231 and 232 of title 31, does not change the situation. The inclusion of these sections in the Code did not have the effect of re-enacting them. The act providing for the codification of the general and permanent laws of the United States expressly declares that the act shall not be construed as repealing or amending any law, or as enacting as new law any matter contained in the Code (see 1 U.S.C.A. p. 3)." United States v. McMurtry, 5 F.Supp. 515, at 517 (August 11, 1933). And;



      "[2-4] Whether an act is amendatory of existing law is determined not by title alone, or by declaration in the new act that it purports to amend existing law. On the contrary, it is determined by an examination and comparison of its provisions with existing law. If its aim is to clarify or correct uncertainties which arose from the enforcement of the existing law, or to reach situations which were not covered by the original statute, the act is amendatory, even though in its wording it does not purport to amend the language of the prior act. United States ex rel. Palmers v. Lapp, 6 Cir., 1917, 244 F. 377, 383. "The character of the act must be determined not by the title alone nor whether it professes to be an amendment of existing laws, but by an examination and comparison of its provisions with prior laws which are left in force." People ex rel. Larson v. Thomson, 1942, 381 Ill. 48, 44 N.E.2d 809, 900. (Emphasis added.). Whatever supplements existing legislation, in order to achieve more successfully the societal object sought to be obtained may be said to amend it. It is evident that the codifiers so considered the particular change." Ballian Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co., 94 F.Supp. 796, at 798 to 799 (December 26, 1950). And;


      5 U.S.C. 552 (a) THE 1974 PRIVACY ACT . . . AND . . . 1 U.S.C. 204 (a) ARE BOTH ACTS OF CONGRESS THAT WERE PASSED IN TO POSITIVE LAW!!!!



      "[1] The United States Code was not enacted as a statute, nor can it be construed as a statute, nor can it be construed as such. It is only a prima facie statement of the statute law. The statutes collected in it did not change their meaning nor acquire any new force by their inclusion. If construction is necessary, recourse must be had to the original statutes themselves. Section 2(a) of the Act of June 30, 1926, 44 Stats. Part 1, page1." Murrell v. Western Union Tel. Co., 160 F.2d 787, at 788 (April 11, 1947). And;



      "The Code establishes prima facie what the laws of the United States are. It is so provided in section 204, title 1, of the Code. Section 112, title 1, of the Code provides, however, that the United States Statutes at Large, "shall be legal, evidence of laws * * * in all the courts of the United States * * *." The Supreme Court stated the rule, in cases of apparent inconsistency between the language of the statute and of the Code, as follows, in Stephans v. United States, 319 U.S. 423, at page 426, 63 S.Ct. 1135, at page 1137, 87 L.Ed. 1490:
      "* * * The fact that the words of 18 U.S.C. § 681 have lingered on in the successive editions of the United States Code is immaterial. By 1 U.S.C. § 54 (a), 1 U.S.C.A. § 54(a) the Code establishes `prima facie' the laws of the United States. But the meaning of `prima facie' is that the Code cannot prevail over the Statutes at Large when the two are inconsistent."
      To the extent that provisions of the Code, cited to us by defendant, are inconsistent with the Statutes at Large, the latter will prevail. To obviate confusion, we have cited the appropriate sections of the Statutes at Large, rather than sections of the Code. However, it is relevant to note that the provisions of the Code which are pertinent to our decision also support our opinion." Best Foods v. United States, 147 F.Supp. 749, at 752 to 753 (June 26, 1956). And;


      TITLE 42 ET SEQ., THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT IS NOT AN ACT OF CONGRESS THAT WAS PASSED INTO POSITIVE LAW!!!!


      "The Act authorizing the preparation and publication of this Code declares that the Code shall "establish prima facie the laws" then in force. Act of may 29, 1928, c 910 § 4, 45 Stat. 1007, as amended by the Act of March 2, 1929, c. 586, § 3, 45 Stat. 1541. See 1 U.S.C. § 204 (b). 1951)." Fisher v. Capital Transit Company, 246 F.2d 666, at 668 (May 16, 1957). And;

      \

      "[5] We do not know what source of United States laws is used in the Commissioner's office but we would be surprised if they were not the same as that commonly used by a judge, namely, United States Code or United States Code Annotated. The mistake, therefore, is perfectly natural. But no one denies that the official source to find United States laws is the Statutes at Large and that the Code is only prima facie evidence of such laws. 1 U.S.C. 204 (a) (1952). See Nashville Milk Co. v. Carnation Co., 7 Cir., 1956, 238 F.2d 86, 89, affirmed 1958, 355 U.S. 373, 379, 380, 78 S.Ct. 352, 2 L.Ed.2d 340; Vance Safeway Stores, Inc., 10 Cir. 1956, 239 F.2d 144, 145, reversed on other grounds, 1958, 355 U.S. 389, 78 S.Ct. 358, 2 L.Ed.2d 350. A check of the United Code of 1946 and the Statutes at Large shows the statement of the taxpayer to be correct on this matter. Now the regulation which came in 1948 was enacted following the 1946 edition. Again, we cannot be sure whether the Commissioner's lawyer who drew the regulation had the Statutes at Large or the Code before him. But if he works as the rest of us do, he had the Code. If he had the Code he undoubtedly though that thought that last paragraph was still the law and there was no reason why he should not think so. [6] The Government meets the taxpayer's arguments by ignoring it. But we cannot. It seems quite clear to us that the regulation when looked at in the light of the statute, as the statute stands after the 1942 amendment, does as the taxpayer says, add an additional requirement which Congress did not put there. The regulation is, therefore necessarily invalid. The judgment of the district court will be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion." Royer's Inc. v. United States, 265 F.2d 615, 618 to 619 (April 7, 1959). And;


      THEREFORE SECTION 7 OF 5 U.S.C. 552 (a) . . . AND . . . 1 U.S.C. 204 (a) . . . SUPERCEDE AND PREVAIL OVER . . . THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT!!!!


      "[1] It is well settled that "the Code cannot prevail over the Statutes at Large, when the two are inconsistent." Stephan v. United States, 319 U.S. 423, 63 S.Ct. 1135, 1137, 80 L.Ed. 1490; Royer's Inc. v. United States, 3 Cir., 265 F.2d 615. The provisions of the Code are merely prima facie evidence of the law. 1 U.S.C. § 204 (a)." American Export Lines Inc. v. United States, 290 F.2d 925, at 929 (July 19, 1961). And;


      ". . . n. 4. This Act as codified, appears at 15 U.S.C. 32. The codification, which has not been enacted into positive law, eliminates the appropriation provision of the Act which by its terms was of no effect after June 30, 1904. The codification makes no other change. 61 Stat. 638, 1 U.S.C. 204 (a), declares that the United States Code establishes "prima facie the laws of the United States, general and permanent in their nature . . . Provided, however, That whenever titles of such Code shall have been enacted into positive law the text thereof shall be legal evidence of the laws therein contained, in all the courts . . ." This Court, in construing that statute has said that "the very meaning of `prima facie' is that the Code cannot prevail over the Statutes at Large when the two are inconsistent." Stephan v. United States, 319 U.S. 423, 426. Even where Congress has enacted a codification into positive, Court has said that the . . . "change of arrangement, which placed portions of what was originally a single section in two separated sections cannot be regarded as altering the scope and purpose of the enactment. For it will not be inferred that Congress, in revising and consolidating the laws, intended to change their effect unless such intention is clearly expressed." Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Corp., 353 U.S. 222, 227, quoting Anderson v. Pacific Coast S.S. Co., 225 U.S. 187, 198-199. Certainly where, as here, the "change of arrangement" was made by a codifier without the approval by Congress, it should be given no weight. "If construction [of a section of the United States Code which has not been enacted into positive law] is necessary, recourse must be had to the original statutes themselves." Murrell v. Western Union Tel. Co., 160 F.2d 787, 788." United States v. Welden, 377 U.S. 95, at 98-99 (April 20, 1964). And;


      THEREFORE, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO OBTAIN A REGULAR DRIVERS LICENSE!!!!


      "Only thou shalt not number the tribe of Levi, neither take the sum of them among the children of Israel." Numbers 1:49


      "And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: . . ." Revelations 18:4


      THEREFORE, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO OBTAIN A COMMERCIAL DRIVERS LICENSE!!!!


      "Only thou shalt not number the tribe of Levi, neither take the sum of them among the children of Israel." Numbers 1:49

      "And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: . . ." Revelations 18:4


      THEREFORE, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO OBTAIN A STATE ID CARD!!!!


      "Only thou shalt not number the tribe of Levi, neither take the sum of them among the children of Israel." Numbers 1:49

      "And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: . . ." Revelations 18:4


      THEREFORE, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO OBTAIN A HUNTING LICENSE!!!!


      "Only thou shalt not number the tribe of Levi, neither take the sum of them among the children of Israel." Numbers 1:49

      "And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: . . ." Revelations 18:4


      THEREFORE, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO OBTAIN A FISHING LICENSE!!!!


      "Only thou shalt not number the tribe of Levi, neither take the sum of them among the children of Israel." Numbers 1:49

      "And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: . . ." Revelations 18:4


      THEREFORE, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO OBTAIN A GENERAL CONTRACTORS LICENSE!!!!

      "Only thou shalt not number the tribe of Levi, neither take the sum of them among the children of Israel." Numbers 1:49

      "And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: . . ." Revelations 18:4


      THEREFORE, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO OBTAIN A ROOFING LICENSE!!!!


      "Only thou shalt not number the tribe of Levi, neither take the sum of them among the children of Israel." Numbers 1:49

      "And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: . . ." Revelations 18:4


      THEREFORE, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO OBTAIN A ELECTRICIANS LICENSE!!!!


      "Only thou shalt not number the tribe of Levi, neither take the sum of them among the children of Israel." Numbers 1:49

      "And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: . . ." Revelations 18:4


      THEREFORE, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO OBTAIN A PLUMBERS LICENSE!!!!


      "Only thou shalt not number the tribe of Levi, neither take the sum of them among the children of Israel." Numbers 1:49

      "And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: . . ." Revelations 18:4


      THEREFORE, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO OBTAIN A REAL ESTATE OR BROKERS LICENSE!!!!


      "Only thou shalt not number the tribe of Levi, neither take the sum of them among the children of Israel." Numbers 1:49

      "And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: . . ." Revelations 18:4


      THEREFORE, YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO GIVE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO OBTAIN ANY KIND OF LICENSE, BENEFIT OR OTHER PRIVILEGE FROM THE STATE!!!!


      "Only thou shalt not number the tribe of Levi, neither take the sum of them among the children of Israel." Numbers 1:49

      "And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: . . ." Revelations 18:4



      NOTE: VOLUNTEERS NEED TO HAND OUT MY THREE (3) NEW ONE PAGE DOUBLE SIDED FLYERS, I HAVE THREE (3) NEW FLYERS THAT ARE ATTACHED WHICH YOU CAN HAND OUT AT ALL THE DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING OFFICES IN WASHINGTON STATE!!!!



      These three (3) new flyers are . . . TWO (2) PAGES . . . when you print them out, but you can take them to . . . KINKO COPY CENTER . . . or any other print shop and have them converted to . . . THREE (3) ONE PAGE DOUBLE SIDED FLYERS . . . and hand them out in sets of three at all the local Department of Licensing and hand them out to everyone waiting to get a drivers license or a commercial drivers license or state ID card!



      It is undisputed that the Washington State Department of Licensing is engaged in the unlawful activity of posting fraudulent legal notices in the outlying offices where people commonly apply for a regular drivers license, commercial drivers licenses, motorcycle licenses, etc., that falsely state that everyone or all members of the public are allegedly required by state or federal law to provide their Social Security Numbers citing RCW 26.23.150, RCW 46.25.070, WAC 308-104-014, 49 CFR 383.153, 42 U.S.C. § 405 (c)(2)(C)(I) and 42 U.S.C. § 666 (a), when the facts and the law clearly show at Title 1 of the United States Code at Section 204 that Congress has NEVER passed Title 42 the Social Security Act into positive law!

      "And putting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, he even took it out of the way, and fastened it upon the cross, . . ." Colossians 2: 14.


      "That we henceforth be no more children, wavering and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the deceit of men, and with crafttiness, whereby they lay in wait to deceive." Ephesians, 4:14


      "Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the ordinances of the world, why, as though ye lived in the world, are ye burdened with traditions?" Colossians 2:20


      "As, Touch not, Taste not, Handle not." Colossians 2:21


      "Which all perish with the using, and are after the commandments and doctrines of men." Colossians 2:22


      TITLE 1 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE ANNOTATED AT SECTION 204 WHICH IS AN ACT OF CONGRESS WHICH HAS BEEN ENACTED INTO POSITIVE LAW . . . clearly shows at pages 73 to 74 all the following titles of the United States Code which have been enacted into positive law by the following Acts of Congress and reads:

      "UNITED STATES CODE TITLES AS POSITIVE LAW
      The following titles of the United States Code have been enacted into positive law by the acts enumerated below:
      Title 1, General Provisions–Act July 30, 1947, c. 388, § 1, 61 Stat. 633.
      Title 3, The President–Act June 25, 1948, c. 644, § 1, 62 Stat. 672.
      Title 4, Flag and Seal, Seat of Government, and the States–Act July 30, 1947, c 389, § 1, 61 Stat. 641.
      Title 5, Government Organizations and Employees–Pub.L. 89-554, Sept. 6, 1966, § 1, 80 Stat. 378.
      Title 6, Surety Bonds–Act July 30, 1947, c 390, 390, § 1, 61 Stat 646, as amended June 6, 1972, Pub.L. 92-310, Title II, § 203 (4), 86 Stat. 202, and repealed Sept. 13, 1982, Pub.L. 97-258, § 5(b), 96 Stat. 1068. See, now, Title 31, Money and Finance.
      Title 9, Arbitration–Act July 30, 1947, c. 392, § 1, 61 Stat. 669.
      Title 10, Armed Forces–Act Aug. 10, 1956, c. 1041, § 1, 70A Stat. 1.
      Title 11, Bankruptcy–Pub.L. 95-598, Title 1, § 101, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2549.
      Title 13, Census–Act Aug. 31, 1954, c. 1158, 68 Stat. 1012.
      Title 14, Coast Guard–Act. Aug. 4, 1949, c. 393, § 1, 63 Stat. 495.
      Title 17, Copyrights–Act July 30, 1947, c. 391, § 1, 61 Stat. 652, as amended in its entirety by Pub.L. 94-533, Title I, § 101m, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2541.
      Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure–Act June 25, 1948, c. 645, § 1, 62 Stat. 683.
      Title 23, Highways–Pub.L. 85-767, § 1, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 885.
      Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial procedure–Act June 25, 1948, c. 646, § 1, 62 Stat. 869.
      Title 31, Money and Finance–Pub.L. 97-258, § 1, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877.
      Title 32, National Guard–Act Aug. 10, 1956, c. 1041, § 2, 70A Stat. 596.
      Title 35, Patents–Act July 19, 1952, c. 950, § 1, 66 Stat. 792.
      Title 36, Patriotic and National Observances, Ceremonies, and Organizations–Pub.L. 105-225, § 1, Aug. 12, 1998, 112 Stat. 1253.
      Title 37, Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services–Pub.L. 87-649, § 1, Sept. 7, 1962, 76 Stat. 451.
      Title 38, Veterans's Benefits–Pub.L. 85-857, § 1, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1105.
      Title 39, Postal Service–Pub.L. 86-682, § 1, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 578, as revised Pub.L. 91-375, § 2, Aug. 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 719.
      Title 40. Public Buildings, Property, and Works–Pub.L. 107-217, Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1062.
      Title 44, Public Printing and Documents–Pub.L. 90-620, § 1, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1238.
      Title 46, Shipping–Pub.L. 98-89, § 1, Aug. 26, 1983, 97 Stat. 500; Pub.L. 99-509, Title V, Subtitle B, § 5101, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1913; Pub.L. 100-710, Title I, § 102, Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4739.
      Title 49, Transportation–Pub.L. 95-473, § 1, Oct. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1337; Pub.L. 97-449, § 1, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2413; Pub.L. 103-272, § 1, July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 745."

      Title 1 U.S.C. § 204 clearly shows that . . . "Title 5 . . . and . . . Title 40 . . . and . . . Title 44" . . . were passed into positive law by Congress and 1 U.S.C. § 204, also clearly shows that . . . TITLE 41 . . . TITLE 42 . . . and . . . TITLE 43 . . . WERE NOT PASSED INTO POSITIVE LAW BY CONGRESS.


      "And we know, that the Law is good, if a man use it lawfully." Timothy, 1:8


      "Think not that I am come to destroy the Law, or the Prophets. I am not come to destroy them, but to fulfill them." Mathews 5:17.

      Therefore, I object to the Washington State Department of Licensing's deceptive practices and . . . "FRAUDULENT ATTEMPTS" . . . to fool the general public into believing that they are allegedly required by RCW 26.23.150, RCW 46.25.070, WAC 308-104-014, 49 CFR 383.153, 42 U.S.C. § 405 (c)(2)(C)(i) and 42 U.S.C. § 666 (a), to provide their Social Security Account Numbers before they may obtain a regular drivers license, a commercial drivers license, a motorcycle license, etc., because Title 42 et seq., the Social Security Act has NEVER been passed into positive law by Congress.
      "And we know, that the Law is good, if a man use it lawfully." Timothy, 1:8


      "Think not that I am come to destroy the Law, or the Prophets. I am not come to destroy them, but to fulfill them." Mathews 5:17.



      It is undisputed that . . .TITLE 1 . . . of the . . . UNITED STATES CODE . . . at . . . SECTION 204 . . . clearly shows that . . . CONGRESS NEVER PASSED TITLE 42 THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT INTO POSITIVE LAW!!!!


      Yes, that's right 1 U.S.C. 204 which is an . . . ACT OF CONGRESS . . . clearly shows that Title 42 et seq., was . . . NEVER PASSED INTO POSITIVE LAW!!!!


      THIS MEANS WE CAN DEMAND . . . DRIVERS LICENSES . . . COMMERCIAL DRIVER LICENSES . . . AND . . . STATE ID CARDS . . . WITHOUT HAVING TO PROVIDE A SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER!!!!


      BECAUSE THE CASE LAW HOLDS THAT ACTS OF CONGRESS SUCH AS . . . 1 U.S.C. 204 (a) . . . AND . . . 5 U.S.C. 552 (a) . . . SUPERCEDE AND PREVAIL OVER . . . 42 U.S.C. 405 (c)(2)(C)(i) . . . AND . . . 42 U.S.C. 666 (a) . . . WHICH ARE NOT ACTS OF CONGRESS AND HAVE NEVER BEEN PASSED INTO POSITIVE LAW!!!!


      "The Code is only prima facie evidence of the laws of the United States. 1 U.S.C. § 204 (a). Where an inconsistency between the United States Code and the Statutes at Large appears, the Statutes at Large prevail over the Code. Stephan v. United States, 319 U.S. 423, 426, 63 S.Ct. 1135, 87 L.Ed. 1490 (1943)." Peart v. Motor Vessell Bering Explorer, 373 F.Supp. 927, at 928 (April 12, 1974). And;



      "[11] Unless Congress affirmatively enacts a title of the United States Code into law, that title is only "prima facie" evidence of the law, see 1 U.S.C. § 204 (a) (1982); "the very meaning of `prima facie' is that the Code cannot prevail over the Statutes at Large when the two are inconsistent." Stephan v. United States, 319 U.S. 423, 426, 63 S.Ct. 1135, 1136, 87 L.Ed. 1490 (1943) (per curiam); see American Bank & Trust Co. v. Dallas County, ____ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 3369, 3375 n. 8, 77 L.Ed.2d 1072 (1983); United States v. Weldon, 377 U.S. 95, 98-99, n. 4, 84 S.Ct. 1082, 1085 n. 4 (1964)." Preston v. Heckler, 734 F.2d 1359, 1367 (June 7, 1984).



      "Title 1, United States Code. –The matters set forth in the edition of the Code of Laws of the United States current at any time shall, together with the then current supplement, if any, establish prima facie the laws of the united States, general and permanent in their nature . . . provided however, That whenever titles of such Code shall have been enacted into positive law, the text thereof shall be legal evidence of the laws therein contained, in all the courts of the United States. . . . Id. (Emphasis in original). If construction of a section of the United States Code which has not been enacted into positive law is necessary, recourse must be had to the original statutes themselves. United States v. Welden, 377 U.S. 95, 84 S.Ct. 1082, 12 L.Ed.2d 152 (1964). Under § 204, the United States Code cannot prevail over the statutes at large if the two are inconsistent. Stephans v. United States, 319 U.S. 423, 63 S.Ct. 1135, 87 L.Ed. 1490 (1943)." United States v. Wodtke, 627 F.Supp. 1034, at 1040-1041 (December 26, 1985). And;



      "Though the appearance of a provision in the current edition of the United States Code is "prima facie" evidence that the provision has the force of law, 1 U.S.C. § 204(a), it is the Statutes at Large that provides the "legal evidence of laws, " § 112, and despite its omission from the Code section 92 remains on the books if the Statutes at Large so dictates. When Congress has enacted a title of the Code as positive law (as it has done, for instance, with Title 11, the Bankruptcy Code, see § 101, 92 Stat. 2549), the text of the Code provides "legal evidence of the laws." 1 U.S.C. § 204(a). But Congress has not enacted as positive law Title 12, in which section 92 for a time appeared. Cf. United States v. Weldon, 377 U.S. 95, 98, n. 4 (1964); Stephan v. United States, 319 U.S. 423, 426 (1943) (per curiam)." UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK OF OREGON v. INDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS OF AMERICA, INC. ET AL., 508 U.S. 439, 448 (June 7, 1993). And;


      "The district court apparently believed that public laws have less "weight" as laws than laws which have been codified. The reverse is true: "the Code cannot prevail over the Statutes at Large when the two are inconsistent." United States v. Weldon, 377 U.S. 95, 98 n. 4, 84 S.Ct. 1082, 1085 n. 4, 12 L.Ed.2d 152 (1964)." Schwier v. Cox, 340 F.3d 1285, 1288 (April 11, 2003). And;



      "Rather, plaintiff simply assumed that § 7(b) controls while the City focused on the codified statute ratther than upon the public law. That being the case, we start with basic principles. First, it is the Statutes at large that "shall be legal evidence of laws." 1 U.S.C. § 112. By contrast, the United States Code shall "establish prima facie the laws of the United States." 1 U.S.C. § 204(a). Thus, even if a portion of Pub.L. 96-579, which appears in the Statutes at Large at 80 Stat. 1896, were omitted from the United States Code, it would retain the force of law. United States Nat. Bank of Oregon v. Indep. Ins. Agents of America, Inc., 508 U.S. 439, 448, 113 S.Ct. 2173, 124 L.Ed.2d 402 (1993); see generally Abner J. Mikva & Eric Lane, Legislative Process, 89-92 (Aspen Law & Business 2nd ed (2002). However, that general principle gives way when a title of the United States Code has been enacted into positive law by Congress; when that happens, "the text thereof shall be legal of the laws therein contained." 1 U.S.C. § 204(a); National Bank of Oregon, 508 U.S. at 448 n. 3, 113 S.Ct. 2173. Congress enacted Title 5 as positive law in 1966. Pub.L. 89-554, 80 Stat. 378. Given that Title 5 has the force of positive law, the viability of § 7(b) is premised upon whether it was codified. It was albeit as a note to 5 U.S.C. § 552a. See 5 U.S.C. § 552a. (Congressional Findings and Statement of Purpose). We are therefore confronted by two provisions of the Privacy Act that contradict one another to some degree: the statutory definition, which unambiguously contemplates that the Privacy Act applies exclusively to federal agencies, and § 7(b), which by its terms includes state and local agencies within its ambit. [3] When faced with statutory sections that are inherently inconsistent, our first duty is to reconcile the competing provisions so that they can both remain in effect. See Daniel v. Cantrell, 375 F.3d 377, 383 (6th Cir.2004); cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 874, ____ L.Ed.2d _____ (Jan. 10, 2004) (No. 04-6822); Anderson v. Yungkau, 153 F.2d 685, 688 (6th Cir. 1946) (dissent); see generally Singer, Norman J. Statutes and Statutory Construction § 28:12 (West Group 6th ed. 2002)." Scmitt v. City of Detroit, 395 F.3d 327 (Jan. 14, 2005). And;



      It was because of the two mixed breed Canaanite wannabe Jews . . . BILL GATES . . . and his college buddy . . . PAUL ALLEN . . and their . . . MICROSOFT COMPUTERS . . . and their . . . INTERNET . . . they were able to give all of us . . . "THE MARK OF THE BEAST" . . . and . . . "THE NUMBER OF HIS NAME" . . . which is . . . "THE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER."


      "And he made all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand or in their foreheads." Revelations 13:16


      "And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark or the name of the beast or the number of his name." Revelations 13:17


      "And the third Angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or on his hand." Revelations 14:9


      "The same shall drink of the wine of wrath of God, yea, of the pure wine, which is poured into the cup of his wrath, and he shall be tormented in fire and brimstone before holy Angels, and before the Lamb." Revelations 14:10


      "And the smoke of their torment shall ascend evermore: and they shall have no rest day nor night, which worship the beast and his name." Revelations 14:11


      It is undisputed that your . . . SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER . . . is in fact . . . THE MARK OF THE BEAST . . . and is . . . THE NUMBER OF HIS NAME!!!!!


      DON'T BELIEVE IT????


      ANOTHER CONSPIRACY THEORY YOU SAY????


      "But the fearful and unbelieving, and the abominable and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone, which is the second death." Revelations 21:8


      42 U.S.C. 666 (a)


      That's right, your eyes are NOT playing tricks on you!


      DON'T BELIEVE IT????


      Go to . . . GOOGLE . . . and type in . . . UNITED STATES CODE . . . and then click on the first LINK and then type in the number 42 in the box marked CHAPTERS and then type in 666 in the box marked SECTIONS and read it yourself!!!!


      WELL GUESS WHAT THE JEWISH ATTORNEY'S DID????


      THEY HID 42 U.S.C. 666 (a) AND MOVED IT SOMEWHERE ELSE!!!!


      But here look at these web links here:


      FINDLAW WEBSITE:


      <http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/42/7/IV/D/666>


      SOCIAL SECURITY WEBSITE:

      <http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title04/0466.htm>


      SEE . . . THE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND WORK OPPORTUNITY ACT OF 1996, PUBLIC LAW 104-193 which reads:

      <http://www.fns.usda.gov/snap/rules/legislation/pdfs/pl_104-193.pdf>


      "And he made all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand or in their foreheads." Revelations 13:16


      "And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark or the name of the beast or the number of his name." Revelations 13:17


      "Here is wisdom, Let him that hath wit, count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man, and his number is six hundred three score and six. Revelations 13:18


      "And the third Angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or on his hand." Revelations 14:9


      "The same shall drink of the wine of wrath of God, yea, of the pure wine, which is poured into the cup of his wrath, and he shall be tormented in fire and brimstone before holy Angels, and before the Lamb." Revelations 14:10


      "And the smoke of their torment shall ascend evermore: and they shall have no rest day nor night, which worship the beast and his name." Revelations 14:11


      42 U.S.C. 666 (a) is in fact and law your . . . SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER . . . which is in fact and law . . . THE MARK OF THE BEAST . . . and . . . THE NUMBER OF HIS NAME!!!!


      "And he made all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand or in their foreheads." Revelations 13:16


      "And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark or the name of the beast or the number of his name." Revelations 13:17


      "Here is wisdom, Let him that hath wit, count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man, and his number is six hundred three score and six. Revelations 13:18


      "And the third Angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or on his hand." Revelations 14:9


      "The same shall drink of the wine of wrath of God, yea, of the pure wine, which is poured into the cup of his wrath, and he shall be tormented in fire and brimstone before holy Angels, and before the Lamb." Revelations 14:10


      "And the smoke of their torment shall ascend evermore: and they shall have no rest day nor night, which worship the beast and his name." Revelations 14:11


      The United States Corporation called . . . THE UNITED STATES . . . that is masquerading and pretending to be our lawful government always hides things in plain site!!!!


      "The territory is a municipal corporation and government, representing all the people within its borders. The county of Spokane is an agency of the territory to carry on certain functions of government. Neither the territory nor county are the real party in interest; but the inhabitants are. The territory by statute is authorized to accept and collect these bonds for the use of the people, and is a trustee of a trust expressed by statute." AINSWORTH v. TERRITORY OF WASHINGTON, 2 Wash. Territory 270, 278 (Januarry 21, 1887). And;


      "That a state government comes within the purview of the act is manifest by the definition of "person" contained in section 302 (h) (U.S.C.A. (Supt.), section 942 (h)). If state governments are not included within the term "any other government," then no political subdivision of any state nor any state agency comes within the purview of the act, for, obviously, the political subdivisions and agencies "of the foregoing" are such as are set up and included within "any other government" within the scope of the act." SOUNDVIEW PULP CO. v. TAYLOR, 21 Wn.(d) 261, 276 ((July 22, 1944.) And;


      "The state acts in two capacities: governmental and proprietary. The distinction between the two is best stated in Cincinnati v. Cameron, 33 Ohio St. 336, approved by this court in Seattle v. Stirrat, 55 Wash. 560, 104 Pac. 834, 30 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1275: "In its governmental or public character, it represents the state, while in the other it is a mere private corporation. As a political institution, the municipality occupies a different position, and is subject to different liabilities from those which are imposed upon the private corporation. But because these two characters are united in the same legal entity, it does not follow that the shield which covers the political equally protects the private corporation." STRAND v. STATE., 16 Wn.(2d) 107, 116 (January 6, 1943). And;



      The Federal Municipal United State Corporation called . . . STATE OF WASHINGTON . . . which is masquerading and pretending to be our government always hides things in plain site!!!!


      "And he made all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand or in their foreheads." Revelations 13:16


      "And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark or the name of the beast or the number of his name." Revelations 13:17


      "Here is wisdom, Let him that hath wit, count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man, and his number is six hundred three score and six. Revelations 13:18


      "And the third Angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or on his hand." Revelations 14:9


      "The same shall drink of the wine of wrath of God, yea, of the pure wine, which is poured into the cup of his wrath, and he shall be tormented in fire and brimstone before holy Angels, and before the Lamb." Revelations 14:10


      "And the smoke of their torment shall ascend evermore: and they shall have no rest day nor night, which worship the beast and his name." Revelations 14:11


      It is undisputed that . . . 42 U.S.C. 666 (a) . . . clearly shows that the . . . SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER . . . is . . . THE MARK OF THE BEAST . . . and . . . THE NUMBER OF HIS NAME!!!!


      "And he made all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand or in their foreheads." Revelations 13:16


      "And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark or the name of the beast or the number of his name." Revelations 13:17


      "Here is wisdom, Let him that hath wit, count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man, and his number is six hundred three score and six. Revelations 13:18


      "And the third Angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or on his hand." Revelations 14:9


      "The same shall drink of the wine of wrath of God, yea, of the pure wine, which is poured into the cup of his wrath, and he shall be tormented in fire and brimstone before holy Angels, and before the Lamb." Revelations 14:10


      "And the smoke of their torment shall ascend evermore: and they shall have no rest day nor night, which worship the beast and his name." Revelations 14:11



      God's Word, at Proverbs 22:1, says, "A good name is rather to be chosen than great riches, and loving favour rather than silver and gold."

      The assignment of federal numerical identifiers is, no less, an attempt to assign Me an alias, whether done for convenience of a "government" agency, or done as a willful attempt to slander My character and other ulterior purposes.

      I have and hold enumerated, unenumerated and unalienable rights and liberties, with imprescriptability attached. The protections thereof are restated in the [United States of America] Bill of Rights and the original, hand written, A.D. 1889 Washington State Constitution, at Article XXVI and other parts, but more important are the fundamental common-law of the land :

      First. That perfect toleration of religious sentiment shall be secured and that no inhabitant of this state shall ever be molested in person or property on account of his or her mode of religious worship.



      And, they are protected by the power of God, the Almighty. I do not believe My religious convictions to be an act of licentiousness or against the peace and safety of the state with regard to matters herein addressed. Further, I do not believe My rejection of application of numbers to Me upsets any institution of this State, STATE OF WASHINGTON, instrumentality of the United States, or of the United States, instrumentalities of the "world government."

      "Congress declared the Bible "THE WORD OF GOD" and 1983 as a national "YEAR OF THE BIBLE," by passing public law 97-280--Oct 4, 1982, 96 STAT. 1211. That law states the Bible, the Word of God, has made a unique contribution in shaping the United States as a distinctive and blessed nation and people. This Declarant has a duty to God, and other men, to understand and apply the commands of God to his life, in both word and deed."

      No man or government has lawful authority to trespass on My religious convictions, as I sincerely know them to be truth (See rights under a "common wealth," herein):


      Protection of free exercise clause extends to all sincere religious beliefs; courts may not evaluate religious truth. Ferguson v. C.I.R., 921 F2d 588 (5th Cir. 1991).

      Free exercise clause forbids government from adopting laws designed to suppress religious belief or practice. American Life League, Inc. v. Reno, 47 F3d 642 (4th Cir. 1995).



      Refer, also, to: RELIGIOUS FREEDOM – The State of Washington original Constitution AD. 1889, Art. 1, § 11; and, Bill of Rights, Art. 1 (A.D. 1791).


      WASHINGTON STATE CONSTITUTION

      SECTION 11 RELIGIOUS FREEDOM. Absolute freedom of conscience in all matters of religious sentiment, belief and worship, shall be guaranteed to every individual, and no one shall be molested or disturbed in person or property on account of religion; but the liberty of conscience hereby secured shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness or justify practices inconsistent with the peace and safety of the state. No public money or property shall be appropriated for or applied to any religious worship, exercise or instruction, or the support of any religious establishment: PROVIDED, HOWEVER, That this article shall not be so construed as to forbid the employment by the state of a chaplain for such of the state custodial, correctional, and mental institutions, or by a county's or public hospital district's hospital, health care facility, or hospice, as in the discretion of the legislature may seem justified. No religious qualification shall be required for any public office or employment, nor shall any person be incompetent as a witness or juror, in consequence of his opinion on matters of religion, nor be questioned in any court of justice touching his religious belief to affect the weight of his testimony. [AMENDMENT 88, 1993 House Joint Resolution No. 4200, p 3062. Approved November 2, 1993.]

      Amendment 34 (1957) -- Art. 1 Section 11 RELIGIOUS FREEDOM -- Absolute freedom of conscience in all matters of religious sentiment, belief and worship, shall be guaranteed to every individual, and no one shall be molested or disturbed in person or property on account of religion; but the liberty of conscience hereby secured shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness or justify practices inconsistent with the peace and safety of the state. No public money or property shall be appropriated for or applied to any religious worship, exercise or instruction, or the support of any religious establishment: Provided, however, That this article shall not be so construed as to forbid the employment by the state of a chaplain for such of the state custodial, correctional and mental institutions as in the discretion of the legislature may seem justified. No religious qualification shall be required for any public office or employment, nor shall any person be incompetent as a witness or juror, in consequence of his opinion on matters of religion, nor be questioned in any court of justice touching his religious belief to affect the weight of his testimony. [AMENDMENT 34, 1957 Senate Joint Resolution No. 14, p 1299. Approved November 4, 1958.]

      Amendment 4 (1904) -- Art. 1 Section 11 RELIGIOUS FREEDOM -- Absolute freedom of conscience in all matters of religious sentiment, belief and worship, shall be guaranteed to every individual, and no one shall be molested or disturbed in person or property on account of religion; but the liberty of conscience hereby secured shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness or justify practices inconsistent with the peace and safety of the state. No public money or property shall be appropriated for or applied to any religious worship, exercise or instruction, or the support of any religious establishment. Provided, however, That this article shall not be so construed as to forbid the employment by the state of a chaplain for the state penitentiary, and for such of the state reformatories as in the discretion of the legislature may seem justified. No religious qualification shall be required for any public office or employment, nor shall any person be incompetent as a witness or juror, in consequence of his opinion on matters of religion, nor be questioned in any court of justice touching his religious belief to affect the weight of his testimony. [AMENDMENT 4, 1903 p 283 Section 1. Approved November, 1904.]

      Original text -- Art. 1 Section 11 RELIGIOUS FREEDOM -- Absolute freedom of conscience in all matters of religious sentiment, belief, and worship, shall be guaranteed to every individual, and no one shall be molested or disturbed in person, or property, on account of religion; but the liberty of conscience hereby secured shall not be so construed as to excuse acts of licentiousness, or justify practices inconsistent with the peace and safety of the state. No public money or property shall be appropriated for, or applied to any religious worship, exercise or instruction, or the support of any religious establishment. No religious qualification shall be required for any public office, or employment, nor shall any person be incompetent as a witness, or juror, in consequence of his opinion on matters of religion, nor be questioned in any court of justice touching his religious belief to affect the weight of his testimony.



      WASHINGTON STATE CONSTITUTION
      ARTICLE XXVI
      COMPACT WITH THE UNITED STATES
      The following ordinance shall be irrevocable without the consent of the United States and the people of this state:
      First. That perfect toleration of religious sentiment shall be secured and that no inhabitant of this state shall ever be molested in person or property on account of his or her mode of religious worship.

      * * *


      Religious convictions are commanded of His People, by [the Word of] God. As previously noted, those convictions are protected by the fundamental Common-Law and the Constitution for the united States of America, A.D. 1787, as amended 1791, and the Original Constitution for the State of Washington, A.D. 1878 Walla Walla, hand written and approved and ordered to be published 50,000.00 copies on January 28, 1889. These rights are established by God and restated by, in and through the Declaration of Independence of the original thirteen united States of America, A.D. 1776, July the 4th. The above fundamental original documents reassure this Declarant's imprescriptable and unalienable rights, or civil liberties (immunities), and these rights supersede any written document of men, as they are gifts from the Almighty God and immunities from action.

      See also your CrRLJ 1.1 SCOPE–DECISIONAL CASE LAW which confirms this document as true in fact and law.

      "We consider the question in complete agreement with Thomas Jefferson's warning "that to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves, is sinful and tyrannical ...." while recalling it was never the intention that our constitution in any manner indicating hostility toward any religion." ...Our responsibility is not to purge religion from society; it is to protect each citizen's constitutional right to religious liberty." MALYON v. PIERCE COUNTY, 131 Wn.2d 779, 784, 785, 935 P.2d 1272 (April 1997)

      "Religious beliefs need not be acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others in order to merit First Amendment protection. Thomas v. Review Bd., 450 U.S. 707, 714, 67 L. Ed. 2d 624, 101 S. Ct. 1425 (1981). Courts "have nothing to do with determining the reasonableness of the belief." State ex rel. Bolling v. Superior Court, 16 Wn.2d 373, 384, 133 P.2d 803 (1943) (quotiing Barnette v. West Va. Bd. Of Educ., 47 F. Supp. 251, 253 (S.D. W. Va. 1942), aff'd, 319 U.S. 624, 147 A.L.R. 674 (1943)).
      The trial court held that Dr. Backlund's beliefs are sincere. Dr. Backlund's beliefs, being sincere, warrant First Amendment protection." BACKLUND v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, 106 Wn.2d 632, 640, 724 P.2d 981 (Sept. 1986).

      "Our state constitution like that of the United States and every state in the Union, by the language used, indicates the framers were men of deep religious beliefs and convictions, recognizing a profound reverence for religion and its influence in all human affairs essential to the well-being of the community. See Gordon v. Board of Education, supra (concurring opinion). Our Preamble reads as follows:
      "We, the people of the State of Washington, grateful to the Supreme Ruler of the Universe for our liberties, do ordain this constitution." It was never the intention that our constitution should be construed in any manner indicating any hostility toward religion. Instead, the safeguards and limitations were for the preservation of those rights." PERRY v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 81, 54 Wn. (2d) 886, 897, 898 (October 8, 1959).


      And see also SOUTHCENTER JOINT VENTURE v. NDPC, cited below which states in part:


      "The preamble to the state constitution, when read in conjunction with the Declaration of Rights, provides further evidence that state action was not intended. The preamble states:
      We, the people of the State of Washington, grateful to the Supreme Ruler of the Universe for our liberties, do ordain this constitution.
      The language of the preamble demonstrates that the framers were not positivists: they did not see the constitution itself as the source of the rights contained within it. Rather, the "liberties" came from a higher source. The framers, then subscribed to theories of natural law and inherent rights similar to those that inspired the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of rights in the federal constitution. See L. Tribe, American Constitutional Law 1309 (2d ed. 1988) (hereinafter Tribe); Corwin, The "Higher Law" Background of American Constitutional Law, 42 Harv. L. Rev. 149 (1928-1929).
      According to contemporary evidence, the reference to God or Supreme Ruler was a great point of controversy at the convention. See Portland Morning Oregonian, July 30, 1889; Tacoma Daily Ledger, July 30, 1889, at 4. When first presented by the committee, the preamble reads: "We, the people of the state of Washington, to preserve our rights, do ordain this constitution." Debate ensued and the delegates introduced various alternative versions of the preamble. The convention eventually comprised and adopted the reference to the "Supreme Ruler." Portland Morning Oregonian, July 30, 1889.
      Both versions of the preamble quoted above imply that the rights inhere in the citizenry rather than emanate from the State. This point, then, was not controversial. Consequently, listing the rights in the constitution could only have been meant to protect them. This protective function is further implied by the title of "Declaration" rather than "Bill" of rights: the document does not confer rights, it declares those that naturally exists. See Wiggins, Francis Henry and the Declaration of Rights, Washington State Bar News 54 (May 1989). The natural law tone of the constitution is strengthened by Const. Art. 1, section 32. This section declares: "A frequent recurrence to fundamental principles is essential to the security of individual right and the perpetuity of free government." SOUTHCENTER JOINT VENTURE v. NDPC, 113 Wn.2d 413, 438, 439, 780 P.2d 1282 (Oct. 1989). And;



      THAT ALL SOUNDS GOOD RIGHT????


      SO HOW COME THE JEW JUDGES ARE NOT HONORING OUR RELIGIOUS CONVICTIONS????


      BETTER MAKE SURE THAT YOU DO NOT HAVE A JEW JUDGE ON YOUR 1974 PRIVACY ACT CASE!!!!


      OH, BUT WE HAVE A PROBLEM THERE, BECAUSE THE JUDGES WILL ALL TELL YOU THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE TO DISCLOSURE WHAT THEIR FAITH OR RELIGION IS TO YOU CITING THE ABOVE PROVISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION REGARDING . . . "RELIGIOUS TEST'S."


      "religious test. An appraisal of a person according to the religion he believes. "No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." US Const<br/><br/>(Message over 64 KB, truncated)
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.