Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Napster to Charge Fee for Music Rights

Expand Messages
  • NHNE
    NHNE News List Current Members: 387 Subscribe/unsubscribe/archive info at the bottom of this message. ... NAPSTER TO CHARGE FEE FOR MUSIC RIGHTS By Matt
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 1, 2000
    • 0 Attachment
      NHNE News List
      Current Members: 387
      Subscribe/unsubscribe/archive info at the bottom of this message.

      ------------

      NAPSTER TO CHARGE FEE FOR MUSIC RIGHTS
      By Matt Richtel and David D. Kirkpatrick
      NY Times
      November 1, 2000

      http://www.nytimes.com/2000/11/01/technology/01MUSI.html

      Napster a start-up that has terrified the recording industry by letting its
      users copy music from each other free over the Internet, agreed yesterday to
      a plan to change course and charge a fee for its service, distributing part
      of the fee as royalties to record companies.

      The plan would be financed partly by one of the companies that tried to shut
      it down ‹ the German media giant Bertelsmann, which lent Napster an
      undisclosed sum to help change the service and received an option to buy a
      stake in the company in return.

      BMG, a Bertelsmann subsidiary, along with the other four major record
      companies, sued Napster in December, accusing the service of abetting
      copyright infringement. The companies are still fighting Napster in court.
      But Bertelsmann said it would drop its suit once the new service was in
      place and was now seeking to persuade fellow record companies to follow its
      lead.

      The agreement promises to change Napster from a freewheeling Internet
      phenomenon with 38 million users that has not generated a profit, into a
      viable business. Napster, started in 1999 by an 18-year-old college student,
      enables users to exchange music files stored on their computers, a practice
      that some artists and the music labels have called wholesale copyright
      infringement because they are not compensated.

      But the deal announced yesterday signaled substantial compromise by each
      party, with Napster announcing it would begin paying record companies. For
      their part, Bertelsmann executives said they concluded it was unwise to
      fight the underlying file-sharing technology of Napster ‹ and the clear
      demand it has created on the Internet.

      "This is a call for the industry to wake up," said Thomas Middelhoff,
      chairman and chief executive of Bertelsmann. "It is not enough to fight file
      sharing in the courtroom." He added that the industry should reassess its
      objection to file sharing, given the business opportunity at stake and the
      38 million users ‹ "They can't all be criminals."

      At a press conference in New York announcing the deal, Mr. Middelhoff and
      Shawn Fanning, the founder of Napster, embraced, a move seemingly
      unthinkable a few months ago given the harsh rhetoric and hostilities
      between the parties. Mr. Fanning then gave Mr. Middelhoff and Andreas
      Schmidt, president and chief executive of the Bertelsmann eCommerce Group, a
      Napster T- shirt.

      Mr. Middelhoff, whose company is a major publisher of books and magazines as
      well as music, said he expected to see business models based on file sharing
      to expand to other media.

      But exactly how the new Napster business model will work is unclear,
      industry analysts said. Officials from Bertelsmann and Napster were vague on
      details of the proposal, citing their negotiations with other music
      companies. It remains unclear, for instance, when they would begin a
      service, how revenue would be shared, whether users accustomed to exchanging
      files freely would agree to pay for the experience, and what the exact price
      would be. Other services like Gnutella and Freenet still offer file sharing
      for free.

      Hank Barry, chief executive of Napster, has suggested a monthly fee of about
      $4.95 might be appropriate, but he stressed that fees had not been set.

      He said Napster would maintain a free, promotional component, but he was
      vague on how the free service might differ from the membership service.

      But others at the companies said that one plan under discussion included
      adding new technology that would impose a time limit on downloaded
      recordings. Users who are not members might be able to download digitized
      recordings with a feature that causes them to lose their utility after a
      certain period. Members who pay a monthly fee would be able to download
      files permanently. Members might also have access to other perquisites, like
      exclusive recordings from some artists or a chance to pay for a higher
      quality download suitable for storing on their own compact disks.

      Also facing Napster is the fundamental question of whether it can build the
      technology to track how many files and what songs people exchange. Under the
      agreement, Napster said it would compensate Bertelsmann, and other record
      labels based on the number of their songs exchanged on the service.

      However, in the ongoing lawsuit, Napster has claimed to the court that it
      does not have the technology to monitor the exchange of individual songs by
      individual users.

      "The technology is under development," Mr. Barry said. "Good people have
      turned their attention to it. Whether they'll succeed or not, we don't
      know."

      In July, a federal judge granted the recording industry's request for a
      preliminary injunction to shut down Napster, with the judge finding Napster
      guilty of contributing to "wholesale copyright infringement." An appeals
      court two days later stayed the injunction. Last month, an appeals panel
      heard arguments about whether to reinstate the injunction pending trial and
      is expected to issued a ruling within several weeks.

      Hilary Rosen, president of the Recording Industry Association of America,
      which is representing the major record labels in the lawsuit, said
      Bertelsmann's deal should not be seen as the company breaking with its
      fellow major record labels. Rather, she said the deal was consistent with
      the industry's ongoing position that labels should be compensated for the
      exchange of music for which they hold the copyrights.

      Ms. Rosen said the deal indicated hypocrisy on the part of Napster for
      arguing in court that it did not need to obtain licenses from copyright
      holders, but then signing a deal to obtain those licenses.

      "Napster's going to have to tell their users, `It's not free anymore. Guess
      what? We're selling too,' " she said.

      Napster said that agreeing to start compensating record companies was not an
      admission that it was guilty of contributory copyright infringement. In
      fact, Napster said the deal announced yesterday was evidence its technology
      has legitimate uses, an argument it perceives as central to it winning the
      lawsuit. "This is further confirmation of the things we're arguing," said
      David Boies, lawyer for Napster.

      Mr. Schmidt, the head of Bertelsmann's e-commerce arm, said the company,
      along with Napster, had already started urging other companies to join in
      the settlement.

      "The industry has not embraced the usage of file sharing ‹ we, together with
      Napster, are going to change all that," he said, asserting his company
      should be crediting with taking the lead. "Somebody had to step up to the
      plate and take the leadership position."

      For Bertelsmann, the investment in Napster provides a missing piece in its
      business strategy, an expanded online outlet for digital versions of its
      books, music and magazines.

      Bertelsmann, one of the biggest media companies in the world, owns the BMG
      Entertainment music club and recording company as well as the book publisher
      Random House, book clubs in the United States and Europe, the magazine
      company Gruner & Jahr, the online retailers Bol.com and CDNow.com and a 40
      percent stake in Barnesandnoble.com.

      Bertelsmann became an early investor in America Online in 1994, but decided
      to sell its stake after America Online agreed to acquire the rival media
      giant Time Warner.

      Mr. Middelhoff compared Napster's online community with America Online's.
      "AOL was in the beginning e-mail, Napster is in the beginning file sharing,"
      he said.

      For now, the other major record companies involved in the lawsuit, Time
      Warner, Sony, Universal Music Group and EMI, said they would pursue the
      lawsuit. "We welcome any development which could lead to Napster creating a
      legitimate service that respects artists' rights and copyright law," a
      spokesman for Sony said in a statement. "However, this alliance does nothing
      to address the millions of past acts of copyright infringement by Napster,
      or those being committed by the company on an ongoing basis."

      Michael B. Nathanson, a media analyst with Sanford Bernstein & Company, said
      it seemed odd for Bertelsmann to make a deal with Napster while it still has
      a chance to win a lawsuit that could effectively put Napster out of
      business. But he said one possible explanation was that the media
      conglomerate was trying to hedge its bet in the event that Napster won the
      lawsuit.

      Eric Scheirer, an analyst with Forrester Research in Cambridge, Mass.,
      concurred. "Either it wins the lawsuit and succeeds in shutting down
      Napster, or Napster wins and Bertelsmann is the first out the door with a
      deal," he said. He added that Bertelsmann had rightly come to embrace the
      idea of file sharing.

      ------------

      NHNE News List:

      To subscribe, send a message to:
      nhnenews-subscribe@egroups.com

      To unsubscribe, send a message to:
      nhnenews-unsubscribe@egroups.com

      To review current posts:
      http://www.egroups.com/messages/nhnenews

      Published by NewHeavenNewEarth (NHNE)
      eMail: nhne@...
      NHNE Website: http://www.nhne.com/
      Phone: (520) 282-6120
      Fax: (815) 346-1492

      Appreciate what we are doing?
      You can say so with a tax-deductible donation:
      http://www.nhne.com/main/donations.html

      P.O. Box 10627
      Sedona, AZ 86339-8627
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.