Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

California Is At Fiscal Brink

Expand Messages
  • NHNE
    NHNE News List Current Members: 755 Subscribe/unsubscribe/archive info at the bottom of this message. NHNE 2002 Fall/Winter Fundraiser: Money needed = $2090.00
    Message 1 of 1 , Dec 9, 2002
      NHNE News List
      Current Members: 755
      Subscribe/unsubscribe/archive info at the bottom of this message.

      NHNE 2002 Fall/Winter Fundraiser:
      Money needed = $2090.00
      Donations to date = $840.00
      Number of people who have helped = 19
      Funds still needed = $1250.00
      To make a tax-deductible donation:
      Web: http://www.nhne.com/main/donations.html
      eMail: nhne@...
      Phone: (928) 282-6120
      Fax: (815) 346-1492
      Mail: NHNE, P.O. Box 2242, Sedona, AZ 86339
      Credit Cards: Please include number, expiration date, phone number.
      Thank you!


      By John M. Broder
      New York Times
      December 9, 2002


      LOS ANGELES, Dec. 8 ‹ When times were good and billions of dollars in income
      tax payments were pouring in from high-tech millionaires, California
      lavished raises on state employees, expanded health care benefits for the
      poor, cut taxes on car licenses and invested heavily in education and

      Those days are over.

      With its huge economy stalled and state revenues plunging, California has
      descended into its worst budget crisis in a decade and is now facing an
      excruciating round of budget cuts and possible tax increases.

      State officials are proposing deep reductions in education, health services
      and other programs to deal with a budget shortfall that could total $25
      billion in the next 18 months.

      "That's a hole so deep and so vast that even if we fired every single person
      on the state payroll ‹ every park ranger, every college professor and every
      Highway Patrol officer ‹ we would still be more than $6 billion short," said
      the Assembly speaker, Herb J. Wesson Jr., a Democrat.

      Gov. Gray Davis announced a series of steps on Friday intended to save $10.2
      billion to plug a deepening hole in the current budget and to serve as a
      prelude to even deeper cuts in next year's. Mr. Davis proposed freezing pay
      for state workers and warned of large-scale layoffs. As many as 200,000
      people could lose their health coverage under the state Medi-Cal program.
      Payments to public schools and universities could fall by more than $3

      And that is just the start. In January the governor must propose a budget
      for the fiscal year beginning in July that needs to address an expected $15
      billion shortfall in revenues. Mr. Davis has not yet proposed tax increases,
      but given the deficit magnitude, they appear inevitable.

      Other states are confronting similar problems, but California's size and the
      bursting of the dot-com bubble make the problem worse here.

      The political combatants are entrenching along familiar ideological terrain.
      The powerful employee and teachers unions are vowing to resist the pay cuts
      and job losses that the governor's plan will require. Republicans have
      pledged to reject any new taxes, saying that the Democratic governor and
      Legislature spent their way into the current morass and must find program
      cuts to claw their way out.

      Democrats respond that the budget shortfall results chiefly from a severe
      drop in revenue from taxes on capital gains and stock options from the
      market run-up of the late 1990's and that those lost revenues must be
      replaced with new taxes.

      In 2000, the state received $17 billion from taxes on capital gains and the
      cashing in of stock options, much of it from the technology industry. State
      officials estimate that the take from such taxes this year will be less than
      $5 billion.

      California prides itself on its progressive income tax, with people earning
      high incomes paying a huge share of state taxes. The top 10 percent of
      filers pay 75 percent of personal income taxes. But when their income drops,
      as it did when the technology boom went bust in early 2000, the state
      treasury crashes.

      "Nobody expected the loss of revenues due to the drop in the stock market to
      be as severe as it has been," said B. Timothy Gage, the state finance
      director. "Nobody anticipated the truly staggering extent of the hit we
      took. States have not seen such drops since World War II."

      California, which generates $1.3 trillion in annual output, is the fifth or
      sixth largest economy in the world. (The state is just above or just below
      France, depending on the state of the Euro.) The current general fund budget
      of $78 billion represents about one-sixth of all state spending nationwide,
      but its current-year budget shortfall of $6.1 billion is fully a third of
      the cumulative state deficits across the country, according to a survey by
      the National Conference of State Legislatures.

      Only five states -- Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho and Nevada -- are in
      worse fiscal shape than California as measured by deficits as a percentage
      of the budget. In dollar terms, no other state comes close.

      Because the California state constitution was amended in 1988 to protect
      spending on education and because of rapidly rising health care costs, the
      state has few options for reducing spending to plug the gap.

      Mr. Wesson, the Assembly speaker, said it was "mathematically impossible" to
      balance the state budget without raising taxes.

      "The way you do it is to put absolutely everything on the table, every
      conceivable cut, every conceivable way to raise taxes," he said. "Then you
      sort out what is the least painful and what is the most fair."

      James L. Brulte, the Republican leader in the State Senate, said that
      raising taxes would not only be insufficient to stanch the red ink but would
      also throttle growth when the economy is sputtering.

      State output fell by 2.3 percent in 2001, according to the Los Angeles
      Economic Development Corporation. The group estimates that the state economy
      will grow by a listless 0.8 percent this year. The unemployment rate is 6.6
      percent (the national rate is 6.0 percent) and is expected to be worse next
      year. Slow economic growth and rising joblessness cause state tax revenues
      to plummet and increase costs for social services.

      "You can raise the alcohol tax, the tobacco tax, the car tax, the income tax
      and sales tax and you still have a multibillion-dollar deficit," said Mr.
      Brulte, who represents Rancho Cucamonga and other bedroom communities east
      of Los Angeles.

      He said the only thing keeping the state afloat was consumer spending, which
      continues to grow, modestly.

      "Raising taxes on consumers clearly would be counterproductive," he said.
      "Raising taxes on business, when we actually need business to step up and
      start investing more so we can continue the expansion, would also be
      counterproductive. Anything that has the tendency to restrain either
      consumer spending or business investment will lead to an even larger deficit
      in California."

      The problem is especially acute for county and local governments, which
      administer the programs that consume the bulk of the state budget --
      schools, Medicaid (known here as Medi-Cal), welfare and public safety.

      Local officials fear that they will be hit hard by reductions in state
      revenue-sharing payments and in shifts in costs now borne by the state.

      "They just expect us to make up the difference," said Pat Leary, the
      lobbyist for the California State Association of Counties.

      Ms. Leary said she hoped Sacramento would rescind the cut in vehicle license
      fees that was passed in the dot-com boom. The cut amounted to $4 billion a
      year, money the counties now badly need to provide essential services.

      "We use it to pay for sheriffs and foster care and others things, and if we
      lost that, it would be devastating to counties, absolutely devastating," Ms.
      Leary said.

      Local school officials are worried, too. While the constitution guarantees
      public schools roughly 40 percent of state tax revenue, the state has been
      spending more than that share in recent years, and Governor Davis said on
      Friday that the overpayments were about to stop.

      Wayne Johnson, president of the California Teachers Association, said the
      state already ranked 38th in spending per pupil, with class size among the
      largest in the country. Any additional reductions "would just push us
      further down in those rankings," he said.

      Governor Davis took office at the beginning of 1999, with the high-tech
      industry roaring and unemployment at about 5 percent. He used the increased
      state revenues to invest heavily in schools and highways and to expand
      state-financed health services for children and the poor. The number of
      state employees grew from 282,000 at the beginning of his tenure to nearly
      326,000 in 2001, according to the California Department of Finance. The
      biggest job growth came in two areas, prisons and state universities.

      Republicans argue that this spending spree caused the current fiscal crisis.
      Davis administration officials say that half the spending was on projects
      that did not permanently add to the size of state government. Yet the
      nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office projects that revenues are so far
      short of spending that the state will run deficits of $12 billion to $15
      billion for the next five years even if the economy recovers.

      In September, Mr. Davis and the Legislature approved several one-time
      economic fixes, including restructuring state debt and borrowing against
      anticipated revenue from the industrywide tobacco settlement of 1998. But
      those were just stopgap measures that offered no help for next year or

      "Given this, there is really no easy way out of the current predicament,"
      said Elizabeth G. Hill, the Legislature's chief budget analyst, "and this
      makes it all the more important that the Legislature take advantage of the
      alternative budget-balancing approaches and options available to it."

      Those include deep cuts in programs, suspension of pay increases for state
      employees, elimination of special tax breaks for business and consideration
      of tax increases on businesses and individuals. Property taxes, which were
      capped by Proposition 13 in 1978, are not an option for new revenue, so many
      analysts expect increases in so-called sin taxes on alcohol, tobacco and

      "California has a very liberal legislature and their easy answer is to pile
      more taxes on the business sector, which is already struggling," said Jack
      Kyser of the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation. "And it's not
      just business that is nervous," Mr. Kyser said. "County and city governments
      are scared half to death.

      "It's not a pretty sight."


      NHNE News List:

      To subscribe, send a message to:

      To unsubscribe, send a message to:

      To review current posts:

      Published by NewHeavenNewEarth (NHNE)
      eMail: nhne@...
      NHNE Website: http://www.nhne.com/
      Phone: (928) 282-6120
      Fax: (815) 346-1492

      Appreciate what we are doing?
      You can say so with a tax-deductible donation:

      P.O. Box 2242
      Sedona, AZ 86339
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.