Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Unexploded Arms Require Cleanup At 16,000 U.S. Sites

Expand Messages
  • NHNE
    NHNE News List Current Members: 753 Subscribe/unsubscribe/archive info at the bottom of this message. ... UNEXPLODED ARMS REQUIRE BIG CLEANUP AT 16,000 U.S.
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 26, 2002
      NHNE News List
      Current Members: 753
      Subscribe/unsubscribe/archive info at the bottom of this message.

      ------------

      UNEXPLODED ARMS REQUIRE BIG CLEANUP AT 16,000 U.S. SITES
      By Vernon Loeb
      Washington Post Staff Writer
      Monday, November 25, 2002; Page A04

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A34776-2002Nov24.html

      Unexploded munitions at 16,000 inactive military ranges, including chemical
      and biological weapons, pose "imminent and substantial" public health risks
      and could require the largest environmental cleanup program ever implemented
      by the U.S. government, according to newly released Environmental Protection
      Agency documents.

      The documents, made available by Public Employees for Environmental
      Responsibility (PEER), a Washington-based advocacy group that advises
      environmental whistle-blowers, also state that EPA officials are concerned
      by the Pentagon's refusal to abide by EPA regulations when cleaning up the
      sites.

      One of the documents, a briefing paper written this summer for the EPA's
      head enforcement officer, cites a "disturbing trend" by the military
      services and the Army Corps of Engineers to limit their cleanup activities
      or "take ill-advised short-cuts to limit costs."

      The EPA documents released by PEER indicate the potential of far greater and
      costlier cleanup problems associated with unexploded ordnance than
      previously acknowledged by government officials.

      Jeff Ruch, PEER's executive director, said his organization obtained the
      documents confidentially from an EPA whistle-blower who believes the EPA and
      the Defense Department are failing to adequately address groundwater and
      soil contamination caused by unexploded munitions on inactive ranges across
      30 million to 40 million acres, an area roughly the size of the state of
      Florida.

      Cleaning up the unexploded munitions, Ruch said Friday in an interview, "may
      be as large as the effort to clean up the military's nuclear weapons
      programs. But what is striking about this is how little is known" about
      contamination related to unexploded munitions, "and there are studious
      efforts being made to ensure that it remains terra incognita."

      One contaminated site now being cleaned up by the Army Corps of Engineers is
      in the Spring Valley neighborhood of Northwest Washington near American
      University, where the military experimented with chemical weapons in World
      War I. Property in the area has elevated levels of arsenic and there is
      evidence of buried munitions.

      Other inactive ranges in the region with unexploded munitions include the
      Aberdeen Proving Ground and Fort Ritchie Army Garrison in Maryland and
      numerous sites in Virginia, including the former Nansemond Ordnance Depot,
      Fort Pickett and the Naval Surface Warfare Center-Dahlgren, according to
      PEER.

      Raymond F. DuBois, deputy undersecretary of defense for installations and
      environment, acknowledged that cleaning up unexploded ordnance could cost
      anywhere from $14 billion to "several times" that much, depending upon the
      eventual use of the land.

      But DuBois denied that the Defense Department has attempted to conceal to
      magnitude of the problem and said that the Bush administration has pledged
      to fully cooperate with the EPA and other federal and state agencies in an
      aggressive cleanup effort.

      "No one could deny that this is a long-term, large problem. We have never
      hidden it. We don't intend to," DuBois said.

      The problems uncovered in Washington's Spring Valley neighborhood, he said,
      "came to me as a shock, but there are probably other Spring Valleys in the
      country, and that's why we are doing everything we can to identify them and
      characterize them. When a situation [like Spring Valley] is appropriately
      elevated to [top priority status], we will reprogram dollars in the middle
      of the fiscal year to address the problem immediately."

      DuBois said his staff is working to complete an inventory by next spring of
      unexploded ordnance on 15 million acres of former military land and 25
      million acres still in the Pentagon's possession.

      One senior EPA official, whose office produced two of the documents made
      public by PEER, said both those documents are more than two years old and
      cite problems related to Pentagon cleanup practices that have since been
      rectified.

      "I think [Pentagon officials] have come a long way in recognizing the
      problem and I think we're working together fairly well," the official said.

      The official said he disagreed "on all accounts" with conclusions in a more
      recent internal EPA document written this summer as a briefing paper for the
      agency's enforcement director, John Suarez.

      That document says EPA is "concerned" over the failure of the Army Corps of
      Engineers and the military services to comply with EPA regulations and
      "adequately coordinate with federal, state and tribal regulatory agencies."

      "Cleanup of [unexploded ordnance] on military ranges has the potential to be
      the largest environmental cleanup program ever to be implemented in the
      United States," the document begins. "Some ranges each cover 100 to 500
      square miles. Many of these properties are Formerly Used Defense Sites
      (FUDS) where the military has relinquished control and are now being
      utilized for purposes other than a military range yet still contain"
      unexploded ordnance.

      Most unexploded ordnance, the document says, contains chemicals defined as
      "hazardous" under federal law. But the cleanup process is complicated even
      further by "the potential presence of explosives."

      "Defining the true nature of the explosives or [unexploded ordnance] threats
      must be addressed first, before standard investigative activities are
      undertaken to define the extent of hazardous chemical contamination," the
      document states.

      The other two documents made public by PEER are reports written in 2000
      summarizing the results of a survey conducted by EPA officials of 61 current
      and former military facilities containing 203 ranges that were either
      inactive, closed or transferred to other owners.

      One of the documents, an interim report dated April 2000 but never made
      public, states that over 50 percent of the survey respondents reported that
      "chemical or biological weapons were found or suspected on their ranges."

      The interim report also says that respondents reported nine "explosions of
      military munitions, six of which involved fatalities."

      The interim report concluded: "Many aspects of [the Defense Department's]
      responses to the immense challenges of clearing and transferring ranges have
      been called into question by EPA. The results of this survey also highlight
      many situations in which [EPA regional offices] are not satisfied with [the
      Defense Department's] handling of the complex policy, technical and
      regulatory issues" involving inactive and transferred ranges.

      None of those points, however, were included in the final report.

      ------------

      NHNE News List:

      To subscribe, send a message to:
      nhnenews-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

      To unsubscribe, send a message to:
      nhnenews-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

      To review current posts:
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nhnenews/messages

      Published by NewHeavenNewEarth (NHNE)
      eMail: nhne@...
      NHNE Website: http://www.nhne.com/
      Phone: (928) 282-6120
      Fax: (815) 346-1492

      Appreciate what we are doing?
      You can say so with a tax-deductible donation:
      http://www.nhne.com/main/donations.html

      P.O. Box 2242
      Sedona, AZ 86339
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.