Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

'Only Technology Revolution Can Save The Earth'

Expand Messages
  • NHNE
    NHNE News List Current Members: 720 Subscribe/unsubscribe/archive info at the bottom of this message. ... Thanks to Joseph Dillard. ... SCIENTISTS SAY A QUEST
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 2, 2002
    • 0 Attachment
      NHNE News List
      Current Members: 720
      Subscribe/unsubscribe/archive info at the bottom of this message.


      Thanks to Joseph Dillard.


      By Andrew C. Revkin
      New York Times
      Friday, November 1, 2002


      Meeting the world's rising energy needs without increasing global warming
      will require a research effort as ambitious as the Apollo project to put a
      man on the moon, a diverse group of scientists and engineers is reporting

      To supply energy needs 50 years from now without further influencing the
      climate, up to three times the total amount of energy now generated using
      coal, oil, and other fossil fuels will have to be produced using methods
      that generate no heat-trapping greenhouse gases, the scientists said in
      today's issue of the journal Science. In addition, they said, the use of
      fossil fuels will have to decline, and to achieve these goals research will
      have to begin immediately.

      Without prompt action, the atmosphere's concentration of greenhouse gases,
      mainly carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels, is expected to double from
      pre-industrial levels by the end of this century, the scientists said.

      "A broad range of intensive research and development is urgently needed to
      produce technological options that can allow both climate stabilization and
      economic development,"the team said.

      The researchers called for intensive new efforts to improve existing
      technologies and develop others like fusion reactors or space-based solar
      power plants. They did not estimate how much such a research effort would
      cost, but it is considered likely to run into tens of billions of dollars in
      government and private funds.

      The researchers, a team of 18 scientists from an array of academic, federal,
      and private research centers, said many options should be explored because
      some were bound to fail and success, somewhere, was essential.

      The researchers all work at institutions that might themselves benefit from
      increased energy research spending, but other experts not involved in the
      work said the new analysis was an important, and sobering, refinement of
      earlier projections.

      As they now exist, most energy technologies, the scientists said, "have
      severe deficiencies." Solar panels, new nuclear power options, windmills,
      filters for fossil fuel emissions and other options are either inadequate or
      require vastly more research and development than is currently planned in
      the United States or elsewhere, they said.

      The assessment contrasts with an analysis of climate-friendly energy options
      made last year by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, an
      international panel of experts that works under United Nations auspices.
      That analysis concluded that existing technologies, diligently applied,
      would solve much of the problem.

      One author of the new analysis, Dr. Haroon S. Kheshgi, is a chemical
      engineer for Exxon Mobil, whose primary focus remains oil, which along with
      coal generates most of the carbon dioxide accumulating in the air from human

      Still, Dr. Kheshgi said on Thursday that "climate change is a serious risk"
      requiring a shift away from fossil fuels. "You need a quantum jump in
      technology," he said. "What we're talking about here is a 50- to 100-year
      time scale."

      Dr. Martin I. Hoffert, the lead author and a New York University physics
      professor, said he was convinced the technological hurdles could be
      overcome, but worried that the public and elected officials may not see the

      In interviews, several of the authors and other experts said there were few
      signs that major industrial nations were ready to engage in an ambitious
      quest for clean energy.

      Prof. Richard L. Schmalensee, a climate-policy expert and the dean of the
      Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management, said the
      issue of climate change remained too complex and contentious to generate the
      requisite focus. "There is no substitute for political will," he said.

      The Bush administration has resisted sharp shifts in energy policy while
      Europe and Japan have accepted a climate treaty, the Kyoto Protocol, that
      includes binding deadlines for modest cuts in gas emissions. At
      international climate talks that end today in New Delhi, leaders of
      developing countries rejected limits on their fast-growing use of fossil
      fuels, saying rich countries should act first.

      President Bush has called for more research, led by the Energy Department,
      on many of the technologies examined in the new analysis. But some energy
      and climate experts said the extent of the challenge would likely require
      far more focus and money than now exists.

      Among the possibilities are space-based arrays of solar panels that might
      beam energy to earth using microwaves. The panel described various nuclear
      options, including the still-distant fusion option and new designs for
      fission-based power plants that might overcome limits on uranium and other

      Planting forests, which absorb carbon dioxide, cannot possibly keep up with
      the anticipated growth in energy use as developing countries become
      industrialized and as global population rises toward nine billion or more,
      the panel said.

      Some environmental campaigners criticized the study's focus on still-distant
      technologies, saying it could distract from the need to do what is possible
      now to reduce emissions of warming gases.

      "Techno-fixes are pipe dreams in many cases," said Kert Davies, research
      director for Greenpeace, which has been conducting a broad campaign against
      Exxon Mobil. "The real solution," he said, "is cutting the use of fossil
      fuels by any means necessary."


      By Charles Arthur, Technology Editor
      The Independent
      Friday, November 1, 2002


      Diplomacy has failed -- meaning that only a revolutionary advanced
      technology will save the Earth from relentless global warming driven by
      greenhouse gas emissions, scientists warned yesterday.

      Avoiding a catastrophic effect on climate from the burning of fossil fuels
      would require political will, international cooperation and huge resources,
      said the team from a group of American universities. But "no amount of
      regulation" could solve the problem, they said.

      Instead it would need dramatic leaps in technology, such as working fusion
      reactors, solar panels the size of Manhattan floating in space, and a
      "global grid" of superconducting power transmission lines to distribute
      electricity without loss around the world.

      Even short-term "defensive" measures -- such as removing carbon dioxide from
      the atmosphere and burying it in underground reservoirs, or filling the
      upper atmosphere with reflective molecules, or building a 1,250-mile-wide
      mirror in space to divert some of the sun's rays -- remain far beyond our
      capability, said Dr Martin Hoffert, professor of physics at New York

      The researchers reported their findings in the journal Science, calculating
      that the world's primary power requirements could triple in the next 50
      years.Models indicated the Earth's temperature could climb by up to 4.5C
      over the next century -- a temperature change equal to that of the global
      cooling which caused the last Ice Age.


      NHNE News List:

      To subscribe, send a message to:

      To unsubscribe, send a message to:

      To review current posts:

      Published by NewHeavenNewEarth (NHNE)
      eMail: nhne@...
      NHNE Website: http://www.nhne.com/
      Phone: (928) 282-6120
      Fax: (815) 346-1492

      Appreciate what we are doing?
      You can say so with a tax-deductible donation:

      P.O. Box 2242
      Sedona, AZ 86339
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.