FW: Re: Statements about statements -- Help needed!
From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:chaals@...]
Sent: 22 December 2005 19:35
To: Russell Duhon; Misha Wolf
Cc: Semantic Web; email@example.com
Subject: Re: Statements about statements -- Help needed!
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:54:48 +0100, Russell Duhon <fugu13@...> wrote:
> The reification approach would likely be a good bet.
> I've worked up a quick example, working from content in your model
> draft ( http://www.iptc.org/
> NAR/1.0/specification/DRAFT-NAR_1.0-spec-Model_12.pdf ) and an example
> in the RDF Primer.
> Here's how it might look (fragmentary, of course):
> random:triple1 rdf:type rdf:Statement .
> random:triple1 rdf:subject random:item42 .
> random:triple1 rdf:predicate newsml:provider .
> random:triple1 rdf:object "iptc.org"^^xsd:string .
> random:triple1 newsml:confidence "0.4"^^xsd:float .
Earlier drafts of EARL actually took this approach. While it is
functionally pretty similar, we moved away from it because it seemed just
a tiny bit more complex to explain, and it really got quite complicated if
you wanted to talk about a set of statements.
Charles McCathieNevile chaals@...
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
Peek into the kitchen: http://snapshot.opera.com/
To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.