Re: CO2 Bubbles nearly done, what now
Actually it was a Scotsman and his sheep I was referring to that Geoff was good enough to send me a while back:
A SCOTSMAN walks into the bedroom with a sheep on a leash and says...
"Honey, this is the cow I make love to when you have a headache."
The wife, lying in the bed reading a book, looks up and says,
"If you weren't such an idiot, you'd know that's a sheep,
not a cow."
The guy replies, "If you weren't such a presumptuous bitch,
you'd realize I was talking to the sheep."
Anyways Poor, back on topic. When you finally decide if your wash is finished, Ken Mc. highly recommends using a turbo clear product to clarify the wash before distillation....
--- In email@example.com, "waljaco" <waljaco@...> wrote:
> Not the Irish! Kiwis are the sheep shaggers...
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "jamesonbeam1" jamesonbeam1@ wrote:
> > Bonjour Geoff,
> > As usually your highly sophisticated European sense of humor has me
> > totally baffled again. Does this have anything in common with that
> > Irishman and his sheep??? Please help me out here [:>] .
> > JB.
- That is what I enjoy about this site. The mods allow humor.I enjoyed this thread.Just MeThe liver is evil.It must be punished.----- Original Message -----From: tgfoitwoodsSent: Friday, June 04, 2010 7:43 AMSubject: [new_distillers] Re: CO2 Bubbles nearly done, what now
No apologies needed, Geoff. Look around you. You are completely surrounded by unfocused word-fools being crude smart-arses. Actually, I think your comments may have elevated the tone of the discussion a bit.
Don't drop into lurk mode; we'd miss you.
Zymurgy Bob, a crude, unfocused, smart-arse word-fool, AND a simple potstiller
--- In email@example.com, "geoff" <jeffrey.burrows@...> wrote:
> Hi Jameson,
> First off let me apologize to you Poor and the rest of the forum for any flippancy on my part I don't know what I was thinking. I broke one of my cardinal rules of drinking my own vodka and half reading and commenting on forum posts. My contribution to this post was absolutely zip and did not answer any of his questions.
> Looking back and reading the original post, I'm in total agreement with you Jameson and all you're in line comments in Poor's original mail. Once again Poor and everyone I apologize for trying to play the fool with words and generally being a crude smart-arse and not staying focused and answering your post properly. So enough said on my part, lesson learned yet again time crawl back into my box, read some more and just generally lurk.