Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [new_distillers] Re: Insulation, Also See Message 37917

Expand Messages
  • Tom Hawk
    Harry, Thanks.  That s what I thought I needed to do.  I was just concerned that there might be something going on in the slanted plate section that I did
    Message 1 of 3 , Apr 5 4:17 AM
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      Harry,
       
      Thanks.  That's what I thought I needed to do.  I was just concerned that there might be something going on in the slanted plate section that I did not understand.  My original intent was to insulate the boiler and the column to the top of ther packing.  I'll proceed in that manner.
       
      Thanks!
       
      Tom


      From: Harry <gnikomson2000@...>
      To: new_distillers@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Sun, April 4, 2010 8:33:40 PM
      Subject: [new_distillers] Re: Insulation, Also See Message 37917

       



      --- In new_distillers@ yahoogroups. com, "Tom" <tomhawk412@ ...> wrote:
      >
      > To Ric or Others Who Have Experiance With His Design,
      >
      > >
      > How much of the upper end of the assembly needs to be insulated? I intend to insulate the 64" reflux column. Should I insulate any of the 11" angled plate section? What about the tee and the 1" gate valve.
      >
      >>

      Insulate to the full length of the packing. After that, any heat losses will help (not hurt) your refluxing and/or product condensing.

      It's not difficult to figure out Tom. Insulation prevents heat loss. Un-insulated areas will lose heat and the vapors will liquefy. The packed column is the critical area. It is the reaction chamber. It must be insulated from heat loss, to provide a stable environment for vapor/liquid co-mingling and separation.

      Slainte!
      regards Harry


    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.