## [ai-geostats] RE: A banal question...

Expand Messages
• Simone Not so banal a question. 34 years ago my supervisor gave me some papers to read which said exactly that. Even with a Master s in applied statistics, I
Message 1 of 1 , May 2, 2005
Simone

Not so banal a question. 34 years ago my supervisor
gave me some papers to read which said exactly that.
Even with a Master's in applied statistics, I could
not make head-nor-tail of the explanation. So I went
on a three week short course at Fontainebleau and they
explained it around the middle of the third week!

A very simplistic explanation: when you calculate an
ordinary covariance you have two columns of figures,
say variable g and f. The covariance between g and f
is calculated (in practice) by multiplying the two
columns together, summing the results and then
subtracting the product of the two means. Difficult to
do in a text email but:

Sum(g x f)/n - mean(g) x mean(f)

This is exactly equivalent to:

Sum (g-mean(g)x(f-mean(f))/n

{leave out the whole n or (n-1) debate at this point)

In a geostatistical context, g would be the value of a
sample (any sample). f would be the value of another
sample a specified distance away. That is, specify one
particular distance (h), find pairs of samples that
distance apart, first sample in pair is g (first
column), second sample in pair is f (second column).
Calculate covariance as above with the modification
that the mean of g and the mean of f will be the same.

Repeat for many different distances and you end up
with a graph of how the covariance of the values
varies with the distance between the samples.

I, personally, prefer the semi-variogram approach
because it is a lot easier to explain! Also, you do
not need to know (or estimate) the mean. More