804Re: AI-GEOSTATS: Akaike's information criterion (AIC)
- Dec 18, 2002
>>The algebraic expression for the AIC results from the bias in the maximumlog-likelihood of a model as estimator of the mean expected log-likelihood,
this bias being a function of the number of free parameters in the model.
So it only covers those models fitted by maximum likelihood.
>Check out 'Akaike Information Criterion Statistics', 1986, by Sakamoto,
>Please, let me know. I'm interested in the AIC.
Ishiguro, and Kitagawa (who are working associates to Akaike himself). KTK
Scientific Publishers, Tokyo. There is an English translation distributed
>If I have 3 models each one fitted with a least square method, are themsuitable for AIC application?
Yes if the models have different number of free parameters, they have an
additive stochastic component, and this component distributes normally.
>Are their SSRs the correct ones to use in the AIC?Not quite. Compute the log likelihood under the normal assumption for each
model and use that in the AIC. If both the mean and variance of the normal
stochastic component are unknown, the log likelihood is
By taking the partial derivative of the log likelihood with respect to mu
and sigma^2, making it zero, solving for the MLE of mu and sigma^2, and
replacing these solutions into L, you get the maximum log likelihood of
Note that mu_hat would be each one of your models.
* To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geostats@...
* As a general service to the users, please remember to post a summary of any useful responses to your questions.
* To unsubscribe, send an email to majordomo@... with no subject and "unsubscribe ai-geostats" followed by "end" on the next line in the message body. DO NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
* Support to the list is provided at http://www.ai-geostats.org
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>