NetLogo 1.0 X 1.1
I would like to know why Netlogo 1.1 updates graphics so slowly. I run the
same model in Netlogo 1.1 and 1.0. Netlogo 1.0 took 5’34” to run the model
100 times. For the same period of time, Netlogo 1.1. got just 40 runs. It
seems the Netlogo 1.1 is slower than 1.0 because of the way it updates
graphics. Is it right? What is wrong? Anyway, I am back to 1.0 version.
- --- In netlogo-users@y..., "Ricardo Machado Ruiz" <ricardo.ruiz2@g...>
> Hello,run the
> I would like to know why Netlogo 1.1 updates graphics so slowly. I
> same model in Netlogo 1.1 and 1.0. Netlogo 1.0 took 5'34" to run themodel
> 100 times. For the same period of time, Netlogo 1.1. got just 40runs. It
> seems the Netlogo 1.1 is slower than 1.0 because of the way it updates1.1 should not have slower graphics than 1.0 -- at least, we don't
> graphics. Is it right? What is wrong? Anyway, I am back to 1.0 version.
know of any reason why it should, and haven't experienced this
What operating system and version, and Java VM version, are you
running 1.0 and 1.1 under? You can get this information from the
"About NetLogo" dialog.
If you're running on Windows, make sure you are using the IBM 1.1 Java
VM. (This is the VM that is bundled if you choose the "with VM"
download option.) NetLogo graphics are much faster -- not just a
little -- with this VM than any other Windows VM. (We're hoping to
remove this discrepancy in a future version of NetLogo, but it's a
If that's not the problem, contact us at bugs@...
and we'll try and help troubleshoot further. There could be a bug
that is triggered by something specific about your model.
Seth Tisue / seth@... / (847) 467-2814
lead developer, NetLogo http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling
School of Education and Social Policy / Department of Computer Science