762Re: Noeron Pyr Again
- Oct 4 12:56 PM--- In email@example.com, Michael Chase <goya@u...> wrote:
>Saffrey, " Connaissance
> Le 22 sept. 05, à 10:20, vaeringjar a écrit :
> M.C. On thihs work see first and foremost H.D.
> et inconnaissance de Dieu : Porphyre et la Théosophie de Tubingen",in
> Gonimos. Neoplatonic and Byzantine studies presented to Leendert G.Recherches
> Westerink at 75, Buffalo 1988, 3-20, reprinted in Saffrey,
> sur le néoplatonisme apres Plotin, Paris 1990, 11-20. Here, Saffreyfact a
> proves that §. 65 , p. 183 Erbse, where Porphyry is cited, is in
> reference to the (Anonymous) Commentary on the Parmenides. Manyregard
> this article as one of the strongest proofs that this Commentary inDear Michael, once again I am in your debt for these references, and
> indeed by Porphyry as Hadot was the first to claim.
fortunately I have that collection of essays by Saffrey. It's
interesting then that Lewy took that other section in the Theosophia
I referred to in my earlier posting to be lifted from Porphyry also,
from the Philosophy Drawn from the Oracles, although I don't know
that has been accepted or even recognized.
I have another study that might be relevant as well, that I have yet
to check, <Porphyre et le moyen-platonisme> by Marco Zambon. He has
one chapter devoted to Porphyry and the Chaldaean Oracles. That is a
subject I would like more clarity on, and I gather from a quick
reading of Hadot's essay appended to the 1978 edition of Lewy that
it's rather a troubled issue. Perhaps Zambon will help there.
- << Previous post in topic