Re: [nanotech] Parade Article
Two issues are raised here:
1. The publicity given to Mr Crichton's work in this forum
2. His highlighting the 'dark side' of nanotechnology.
I think that as a writer of fiction, he is entitled to exercise his imaginative skills. I do agree though that we need a balanced view from commentators at this forum. But then, maybe Mr Crichton is out to provoke a debate!
In that sense I personally have no objection to anyone publicising his work, either here, or in any other forum
The article in Parade by Michael Crichton was a well publicized addition to the
knowledge of the nanotech field. Unfortunately, knowledge was not the point of
the article. The potential of every discovery of our efforts going to the dark
side of our nature was certainly emphasized.
A question for Mr. Crichton. Was there any effort to examine the effects of
nanotechnology in the more mundane aspects of our economy? The aspects that
keep people employed. Currently, a form of this technology is being employed
to improve efficiencies in the area of fabric formation in the USA textile
industry. Lower costs, higher quality product, lower effects on the
environment, etc., have been demonstrated. Were these aspects even considered
in any "research" of the topic?
If the dark side of what we have been trying to achieve is the point, why
bother? The overwhelming majority of our group would not subscribe to this
very limited philosophy.
The Nanotechnology Industries mailing list.
"Nanotechnology: solutions for the future."
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now