1951Re: [nanotech] Re: can nanotech be introduced into our bodies?
- Jul 3, 2001On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Ed Minchau wrote:
> The one major nuclear accident in the USSR (Chernobyl) was *not* dueThere have been several nuclear accidents in former USSRs and successor
states history. In fact the "normal operation" of USSR/successors nuke
shops can be considered a chronical calamity.
> to faulty or "primitive" design. It was due to a few drunkenDon't spread false rumours. What happened is that a) they were running an
> engineers pulling all the control rods out of the reactor, to see how
> much power they could generate before the reactor blew its top...
> just sober enough to do it, and just drunk enough to not think about
> the consequences.
experiment b) in low power the reactor behaviour was very unstable, and
they had to switch off the automatical shutdown to be able to conduct the
experiment c) the control rods did have a paradoxical effect on
criticality during early insertion.
So, IIRC they went into low regime (with automation switched off), and
starved the reactor. Then then attempted to go higher, but the reactor was
just sitting there. Then, they suddenly got a monster surge, panicked, and
manually triggered the emergency rods, which in the early insertion stage
actually enhanced the criticality.
The rest is history.
These things are easy to judge in the retrospective, unfortunately only in
-- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204/">leitl</a>
ICBMTO : N48 10'07'' E011 33'53'' http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204
57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3
- << Previous post in topic