Re: [mythsoc] The Curse of Chalion
- Joan, that's pretty much how I felt about "The Fionavar Tapestry" by Guy
I started to read volume 1 of that, and bogged down in sheer tedium after
about a hundred pages. The descriptions of the books I got from most of
their fans didn't leave any hope that it would get better, but one such
person did tell me that she thought perhaps the first hundred pages were a
little slow, but it got better after that.
I'd heard such comments about other books I hadn't liked, but had never
paid much attention. This time I decided to test it out. After all, LOTR
changes character sharply after the opening chapters, and I could easily
conceive of a reader liking one style but not the other.
So I returned to "Fionavar," took a running leap through the first hundred
pages (i.e. re-read them hastily, just to refresh my memory) and pressed on.
Yes, it did get better. But it was still terrible, just not as terrible.
So I quit again, and haven't read anything by Kay since.
I've heard that his writing has improved since then. But by how much?
- David Bratman
At 07:42 PM 4/12/2003 -0500, Joan wrote:
>I've finished The Curse of Chalion (at last) and as promised, I'm
>First off, my first impression of the novel holds. The first half of it
>IS pretty dull. I would have enjoyed it more if all that had been
>compressed into a handful of chapters. Someone speculated that I might
>have found it dull because of the politics in it; actually I find
>politics stimulating. But not in the first half of this novel.
>Very little of importance or consequence happens until Dondo dies, when
>the story picks up considerably. After that, it is interesting. Not
>outstanding, in my opinion, but interesting. This is not the sort of
>novel I'd nominate for an award, and I certainly wouldn't vote for it
>for an award, either. I've read much better stories. But the second
>half, at least, held my attention.
>Nonetheless, I still intend to try the sequel, which sounded much more
>interesting than The Curse of Chalion when Bujold read from it at the
- David S Bratman wrote:
>I appreciate the advice. I haven't read The Fionavar Tapestry by Kay,
> Joan, that's pretty much how I felt about "The Fionavar Tapestry" by Guy
> Gavriel Kay.
> Yes, it did get better. But it was still terrible, just not as terrible.
but if I ever do, and it's boring for the first 100 pages, I'll leave it
Joan Marie Verba
- David S Bratman writes:
>I've heard that his writing has improved since then. But by how much?He's still sloppy, though IMO, the Sarentine stuff is a lot -less-
sloppy than a lot of his intermediate work. And he's doing a decent
worldbuilding job now rather than throwing in any old thing and
calling it fantasy. And his plotting and characters have improved a
great deal (but that's not what people love the Fionavar tapestry
Mostly...his post-Fionavar work has been much more of a piece than any
of it is with the Fionavar stuff...and has been getting better as
things went, but isn't really comperable with Fionavar -- either in
terms of characters, theme, or worldbuilding, for the most part.
Joshua Kronengold (mneme@...) "I've been teaching |\ _,,,--,,_ ,)
--^--him...to live, to breathe, to walk, to sample the /,`.-'`' -, ;-;;'
/\\joy on each road, and the sorrow at each turning. |,4- ) )-,_ ) /\
/-\\\I'm sorry if I kept him out too late"--Vlad Taltos '---''(_/--' (_/-'