Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Rowling - an Inkling??

Expand Messages
  • Pauline J. Alama
    ... stretch ... meaninglessness--but ... that we ... possessed a ... the ... Rowling ... Inklings ... I disagree. When I found out Rowling s degree was in
    Message 1 of 31 , Mar 7, 2003
      --- In mythsoc@yahoogroups.com, "Ernest Tomlinson" <thiophene@f...>
      > As I see it, the distinguishing characteristics of the
      > Inklings weren't so much that they were Christians writing Christian
      > books--not all of the Inklings' books were Christian, except if you
      > the application of the adjective "Christian" almost to
      > that they were by and large academic men, well-read to a degree
      that we
      > products of American public schools can only dream about, and
      possessed a
      > profound knowledge and appreciation for the literature and myths of
      > past, especially Northern European mythology. I know little of
      > outside of her writings, but I don't see much evidence for that same
      > profound learning and appreciation for mythology that flavors the
      > fiction.

      I disagree. When I found out Rowling's degree was in Classics and
      French, I was not at all surprised. Besides the obvious use of Latin
      for spells, many of the characters' names have significance in Latin
      or French (Malfoy = bad faith in Old French, unless my memory is off -
      - I've been out of academia for some years). Malfoy's name may also
      point to Spenser's villain Sansfoy in the Fairie Queene. Some of the
      mythical beasts seem derived from medieval bestiaries; the hippogriph
      might also come from Orlando Furioso. The revivifying cauldron in
      Book 4 comes from the Mabinogion. She's obviously studied British
      folklore, too -- the Grim comes from a common English legend alluded
      to in Jane Eyre as the gittrash. The house-elves are brownies (they
      disappear if you clothe them).
    • Paul F. Labaki
      Thank you, David, for putting this so aptly. Peace, Paul Labaki From: David S Bratman Reply-To: mythsoc@yahoogroups.com Date: Sat, 01
      Message 31 of 31 , Mar 10, 2003
        Thank you, David, for putting this so aptly.

        Paul Labaki

        From: David S Bratman <dbratman@...>
        Reply-To: mythsoc@yahoogroups.com
        Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 09:33:14 -0800
        To: mythsoc@yahoogroups.com
        Subject: Re: [mythsoc] Rowling - an Inkling??

        Lizzie, what do you mean? That writing in the spirit of the Inklings
        should be currently pertinent? Lewis wouldn't think so. He says somewhere
        that nothing goes out of date faster than that which tries hardest to stay
        up to date. (My own phrasing of this, conceived independently, is "Those
        who live by the cutting edge die by the cutting edge.") The Inklings were
        in search of what was eternally up to date, and that is why their 40 to 70
        year old novels are still meaningful and read today. LOTR in particular
        was considered by many to be ludicrously out of step with the current
        concerns of the 1950s, but the Inklings suspected it would wear better than
        many of the more typical cultural artifacts of the era, and they were
        right. Those who admired it when it was new thought it would be a
        masterpiece at any date.

        That spirit is part of what I'm looking for when I'm searching for new
        books in the spirit of the Inklings. I want books that would have been
        just as good if they were published 50 years ago as they are now, because
        those are the ones that will be just as good 50 years from now.

        - David Bratman

        At 07:23 AM 3/1/2003 -0500, Lizzie Triano wrote:

        >I think it is worth discussing. I don't know what my opinion is on the
        >specific Rowling question, but I have long been developing the opinion that
        >the Inkling Spirit today would be perhaps unrecognizable to the Inklings
        >Then. After all, the churches probably are, post-Vatican-II and ordaining
        >women priests, arguing the various sex and social justice issues, and all
        >sorts of such things. There is surrealism and spirituality in the
        >non-churched (which was of course true in the Victorian era), and there
        >needs must be practicality and stuff in the church (which I would imagine
        >there was among veteran Christians such as Tolkien, more than among today's
        >peace-raised peoples). We are not hungry enough, we are too content. What
        >would the Spirit tell stories about today?

        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
        var lrec_target="_top"; var lrec_URL = new Array(); lrec_URL[1] =
        uite=A33405"; var link="javascript:LRECopenWindow(1)"; var lrec_flashfile =
        00x250.swf?clickTAG='+link+''; var lrec_altURL =
        Suite=A33405"; var lrec_altimg =
        00x250.gif"; var lrec_width = 300; var lrec_height = 250;
        The Mythopoeic Society website http://www.mythsoc.org

        Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
        <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .

        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.