Re: [mythsoc] Rowling - an Inkling??
- I'm sorry if that didn't make much sense. And I do love the old stuff
too... I keep meaning to reread my Williams' Arthuriad and revisit North
Wales and so forth and so on. But for some reason as I grow older (and
lately prompted by nudgy data about church demographics) I want to consider
things outside the narrow beam of golden-boy-Galahad-at-the-Mass, so to
speak. Not that I don't adore the golden heroes and their Faerie settings.
And I didnt' like Arthur Miller either. I don't even do well with Louise
Erdich. But I don't want to be a Pollyanna, either, and I suspect I have a
strong natural inclination so to be.
amor vincit omnia
- Thank you, David, for putting this so aptly.
From: David S Bratman <dbratman@...>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 09:33:14 -0800
Subject: Re: [mythsoc] Rowling - an Inkling??
Lizzie, what do you mean? That writing in the spirit of the Inklings
should be currently pertinent? Lewis wouldn't think so. He says somewhere
that nothing goes out of date faster than that which tries hardest to stay
up to date. (My own phrasing of this, conceived independently, is "Those
who live by the cutting edge die by the cutting edge.") The Inklings were
in search of what was eternally up to date, and that is why their 40 to 70
year old novels are still meaningful and read today. LOTR in particular
was considered by many to be ludicrously out of step with the current
concerns of the 1950s, but the Inklings suspected it would wear better than
many of the more typical cultural artifacts of the era, and they were
right. Those who admired it when it was new thought it would be a
masterpiece at any date.
That spirit is part of what I'm looking for when I'm searching for new
books in the spirit of the Inklings. I want books that would have been
just as good if they were published 50 years ago as they are now, because
those are the ones that will be just as good 50 years from now.
- David Bratman
At 07:23 AM 3/1/2003 -0500, Lizzie Triano wrote:
>I think it is worth discussing. I don't know what my opinion is on theYahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
>specific Rowling question, but I have long been developing the opinion that
>the Inkling Spirit today would be perhaps unrecognizable to the Inklings
>Then. After all, the churches probably are, post-Vatican-II and ordaining
>women priests, arguing the various sex and social justice issues, and all
>sorts of such things. There is surrealism and spirituality in the
>non-churched (which was of course true in the Victorian era), and there
>needs must be practicality and stuff in the church (which I would imagine
>there was among veteran Christians such as Tolkien, more than among today's
>peace-raised peoples). We are not hungry enough, we are too content. What
>would the Spirit tell stories about today?
var lrec_target="_top"; var lrec_URL = new Array(); lrec_URL =
00x250.swf?clickTAG='+link+''; var lrec_altURL =
Suite=A33405"; var lrec_altimg =
00x250.gif"; var lrec_width = 300; var lrec_height = 250;
The Mythopoeic Society website http://www.mythsoc.org
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]