Re: [mythsoc] Rowling - an Inkling??
- View SourceWhat bothers me most about the Harry Potter books, morally speaking, is
that Harry often seems protected from the consequences of his actions. When
(say) Eustace and Jill stuff things up in _The Silver Chair_, they know it
and have to live with it >>
Well exactly. There is a good starting point. I am thinking of a sort of
shift from assumed hierarchical authoritarian type values, to something
with more unknowns. Harry doesn't know anything about his parents, and we
the readers can only guess at things like Dumbledore's relation to Hagrid,
and what's the story with Snape... Harry has to muddle through doing what
seems right, rules to the contrary. Sometimes, and I have not read them
recently nor often, I think Harry has some foreknowledge (inklings or
information) of things unpleasant, and yet faces them, well, as best as any
man could. Sorry for the sexism.
There is a lot of fiction today that muddles through, trying to find the
Truth and all, and I"m not saying it's all mythopoeic. I guess I am sort
of of the Kristofferson/Cash school. I have to find the tape with a song I
was trying to remember in the shower this morning. There are a lot of
stories, in the older country songs, about finding your way through dark
places, and falling down a lot. I don't really know anything about
We can't trust most of the old authorities... or rather we have to pick and
choose when we can believe them and when we can't. We can't trust
ourselves either, rationalization is a powerful thing. (I have my favorite
well-loved vices to be sure.) At the end of The Last Battle, Aslan says
something very profound about service... you can do the wrong thing and say
you are serving him but really you are serving the Enemy... and you can do
the right thing without seeming to know him and yet be serving him.
I am not saying that Rowling is a great mythic writer necessarily, because
I haven't really been that moved by Harry. But the question raised, about
how to recognize things today, is one I like to chew on. And also we are
reading this as grownups. It would be different to read it as youngsters.
I was recently challenged to go back and try to reread some Burroughs, like
the Mars or Venus books. After I struggle on a bit with the Lensman books,
and a few other things, I will take up that challenge and see if I find
them as entertaining and colorful as I did 20 years ago -- or if I can't
swallow them atall.
amor vincit omnia
- View SourceThank you, David, for putting this so aptly.
From: David S Bratman <dbratman@...>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 09:33:14 -0800
Subject: Re: [mythsoc] Rowling - an Inkling??
Lizzie, what do you mean? That writing in the spirit of the Inklings
should be currently pertinent? Lewis wouldn't think so. He says somewhere
that nothing goes out of date faster than that which tries hardest to stay
up to date. (My own phrasing of this, conceived independently, is "Those
who live by the cutting edge die by the cutting edge.") The Inklings were
in search of what was eternally up to date, and that is why their 40 to 70
year old novels are still meaningful and read today. LOTR in particular
was considered by many to be ludicrously out of step with the current
concerns of the 1950s, but the Inklings suspected it would wear better than
many of the more typical cultural artifacts of the era, and they were
right. Those who admired it when it was new thought it would be a
masterpiece at any date.
That spirit is part of what I'm looking for when I'm searching for new
books in the spirit of the Inklings. I want books that would have been
just as good if they were published 50 years ago as they are now, because
those are the ones that will be just as good 50 years from now.
- David Bratman
At 07:23 AM 3/1/2003 -0500, Lizzie Triano wrote:
>I think it is worth discussing. I don't know what my opinion is on theYahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
>specific Rowling question, but I have long been developing the opinion that
>the Inkling Spirit today would be perhaps unrecognizable to the Inklings
>Then. After all, the churches probably are, post-Vatican-II and ordaining
>women priests, arguing the various sex and social justice issues, and all
>sorts of such things. There is surrealism and spirituality in the
>non-churched (which was of course true in the Victorian era), and there
>needs must be practicality and stuff in the church (which I would imagine
>there was among veteran Christians such as Tolkien, more than among today's
>peace-raised peoples). We are not hungry enough, we are too content. What
>would the Spirit tell stories about today?
var lrec_target="_top"; var lrec_URL = new Array(); lrec_URL =
00x250.swf?clickTAG='+link+''; var lrec_altURL =
Suite=A33405"; var lrec_altimg =
00x250.gif"; var lrec_width = 300; var lrec_height = 250;
The Mythopoeic Society website http://www.mythsoc.org
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]