Re: [mythsoc] Jackson comments, again
- "Wayne G. Hammond" wrote:
>*sigh* I would really like to read what Wayne had to say, but I
> >I reached it not by that link, which came up with a blank page, but by
> >going to the link for the paper's "14-Day Archive" and scrolling down.
> >I captured the text and Listmistress Joan may tell me whether it is
> >legit. to post it here. (It's a Letter to the Editor, anyway, not an
> >article; I would think it remains Wayne's property and that he wouldn't
> >mind, but I don't know)
> I don't know either: some letters sent to newspapers become the property
> of the paper, but mine was a letter to a reporter in lieu of a telephone
> interview, not a proper letter to the editor; at the same time, it's an
> article, but wasn't written as one (the reporter made it so, to my
> surprise), and it has a copyright notice by the Post-Standard. In any case,
> it's easy enough to read the piece on site, just go from the link at
> http://www.syracuse.com/news/poststandard/kirst/index.ssf. No subscription
> necessary. Just don't try to search for my name through the search box on
> syracuse.com, for some reason it brings up only the related general article
> about fans disagreeing about the films. The article in question disappeared
> from the site for a few hours yesterday, apparently a system glitch, but
> was restored early this morning.
can't get either link to provide a download of the page in
anything like a reasonable amount of time. (Just as an
indication, I tried the longer version of the link earlier today,
and sat there with a book until my screen saver came on -- and I
have it on a ten-minute delay.) If some kind person has captured
it and could send me a copy by private email, that wouldn't
violate copyright, would it?
- A problem with the column from the Syracuse newspaper with Wayne's comments
on the films just occurred to me: Where does this columnist Sean Kirst get
off with passing off what's actually a letter from Wayne as one of his
columns? Did this guy actually turn this in as his column for the week and
get paid for it? (Note that it's his picture by the column, not Wayne's.)
Wayne, if I were you, I would write this guy and demand he send you whatever
he got paid this week, since you wrote the column for him.
- Wendell wrote:
>A problem with the column from the Syracuse newspaper with Wayne's commentsWhen my comments were published in the Post-Standard newspaper, before they
>on the films just occurred to me: Where does this columnist Sean Kirst get
>off with passing off what's actually a letter from Wayne as one of his
>columns? Did this guy actually turn this in as his column for the week and
>get paid for it? (Note that it's his picture by the column, not Wayne's.)
>Wayne, if I were you, I would write this guy and demand he send you whatever
>he got paid this week, since you wrote the column for him.
went on the web, they were only a sidebar to the main article "New 'War of
the Ring' Rages". So Kirst earned his paycheck for the latter. If he
hadn't, I certainly would have complained!