Re: [mythsoc] Two questions
- Wendell, as the disproving of your proposed statements a, b, and c is the
essence of what I was saying in 3 sentences, I'm not sure why you devoted
(by my e-mail program's count) 10 KB to tell me the same thing.
I've gone back and re-read your original post, and I still think my comment
was worth making, and not "a pretty silly misinterpretation." In
particular, I think your proposed statistical survey would not prove
anything. There are too few writers of genius in any place and time to
demonstrate that any trend is statistically significant. More importantly,
they differ entirely in temperament and reaction to influences.
If Shippey is correct, and Tolkien, Lewis, White, et al., wrote as they did
at least partly in response to war trauma, it still does not at all
necessarily follow that any other writers (let alone a statistically
significant number) must have done the same thing. In other words, a
statistical survey with a negative result would not disprove Shippey's
And if a statistically significant number of writers did do as Shippey
suggests, that does not prove that any given one of them did so for the
reasons he suggests. If (let us suggest) the Jackson film appealed to
audiences because it's an action film, that does not prove that I went to
see it twice because I like action films (I don't).
How then can Shippey's hypothesis be proved? By a counter-example
scientific procedure, as you propose, it can't. Which is surely why
Shippey did not claim to have proven anything, as Janet noted. It can only
be judged probable on a case-by-case test: Here's a bunch of writers who
all experienced this, and who all wrote this way, and here's the evidence
(concrete resemblance between their fiction and the reality they
experienced; comments they made about their fiction and why they wrote)
that there's a connection. This is how evidentiary technique in literary
criticism usually works. Shippey's arguments in this mode seemed
satisfactory to me. Statistics about writers as a whole would add nothing
- From: <SusanPal@...>
> *My* interest in pursuing the issue is to examinesort
> the ways in which fantasy allows people to respond to trauma -- of any
> -- in *productive* (rather than "escapist") ways that aren't possible inSusan, you need to get in contact with Dr. Bruce Leonard, a Colorado mythie.
> realist narrative.
He's a psychiatrist in Columbine. At this most recent Mythcon, Dan Timmons
showed the video he had been filming last year, which includes interviews
with various members of the Mythopoeic Society.
In the video, Bruce said that, in his practice, he found that many of his
younger patients had read _The Lord of the Rings_. He eventually caught on
that finding who they identified with was a tremendous indicator of how
badly damaged they were and the prospect of recovery. (I'm probably
misrepresenting him terribly, but this is my impression of what was said.)
He found that patients who identified with Frodo had much, much better
chances of recovery than those who identified with Gollum. (Me, I never
even conceived of someone identifying with Gollum.)
Some years earlier (the first Colorado Mythcon?) he gave a splendid paper on
Frodo as a sufferer of post-tramatic stress syndrome.
- In a message dated 8/12/2002 5:32:48 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> He found that patients who identified with Frodo had much, much betterWow. Good heavens! The LotR Personality Quiz: better than the Myer-Briggs
> chances of recovery than those who identified with Gollum. (Me, I never
> even conceived of someone identifying with Gollum.)
. . . .
This does sound fascinating (and someone else mentioned his name a while ago;
I've been really slow about responding to posts because I just got a bear of
a work project off my back this morning). Thanks for the recommendation!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- I was searching for something else when I stumbled on this
interesting old post, but I can't find that there was ever any follow-
up on one small point, by Michael Martinez or anyone else:
"...Denethor sports a long white beard..."
Was Denethor bearded? I didn't know that, and I can't find a
reference to it in The Lord of the Rings. Does anyone have a
I know of a website that purports to list the eye and hair colors
(including beards) of all the characters in LotR, The Hobbit, The
Silmarillion and Unfinished Tales:
but even if that site is completely accurate, merely not listing a
beard color for Denethor doesn't mean there is no beard, only that
its color is not given in the text of those books.
Is Denethor described as having a beard elsewhere? In LotR drafts,
I did read an interesting short essay on Denethor about a year ago
that noted that his face is described in more detail than most other
characters in LotR:
Nothing there about a beard (or lack of one), however.
>>--- Mysthoc message #6263discussion through the years. Happily, it can all be resolved with a
>>--- On Aug 7, 2002 6:17 pm, "michael_martinez2" <michael@...> wrote:
>>This whole "bearded Elves" issue has caused a great deal of
few citations....which I am unable to provide, because I'm about to
leave work and don't know when my Internet access at home will be
restored. Still, here is what I can recall on my own. Treat it as a
rough summation of the facts, subject to correction at a later time.
>>The passage in UNFINISHED TALES is found in the chapter onGaladriel and Celeborn and is in one of the appendices. It concerns
Prince Imrahil's Elvish ancestry, and Christopher Tolkien paraphrases
some late-life essay of his father's. Many readers have taken this
as the final word in Elf beards.
>>But it's not. A couple of issues back, VINYAR TENGWAR publishedsome additional material for "The Shibboleth of Feanor". In one of
the notes associated with this material, JRRT writes that Nerdanel's
father was remarkable for having grown a beard in the Second Cycle
(of his life).
>>The reader is left to infer that all male Elves normally growbeards when they reach their Third Cycle (no clues, yet, as to what
defines a cycle of life). Cirdan, by inference (rather than
implication, since the note does not mention him), must have long
since reached his Third Cycle by the end of the Third Age.
>>Since Denethor sports a long white beard, and since the statue ofthe Gondorian king by the crossroads (where Frodo, Sam, and Gollum
watch the army from Minas Morgul pass by) has a beard, it must be
accepted that Dunadan men DID grow beards, but perhaps because of
their Elvish ancestry (THE PEOPLES OF MIDDLE-EARTH says that the
Stewards were "ultimately of royal origin"), some of the Dunedain did
not grow beards until THEIR Third Cycle (or some Dunadan/half-elf
equivalent of the full Elvish Third Cycle).
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Merlin DeTardo" <emptyD@...>
> I did read an interesting short essay on Denethor about a year
> that noted that his face is described in more detail than mostother
> characters in LotR:In the absence of other evidence, I would apply ejusdem generis
here and say he was (probably) beardless. Of course that says
nothing about his genetics, just his razor.
Take MM with a grain of salt- he does tend to extrapolate
"facts" where there are only possibilities. The "true" answer is
dormitat Homerus: Tolkien really wasn't paying attention when he
stuck beards on Cirdan and the ancient statue. Convincing as
Tolkien is, there isn't actually an underlying reality to be