Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [mythsoc] Literary vs. SF

Expand Messages
  • Trudy Shaw
    There are a few sentences in the letter to Locus shared by Donovan that I ve ... From: Donovan & Lillian Mattole To:
    Message 1 of 3 , Oct 24, 2000
    • 0 Attachment
      There are a few sentences in the letter to Locus shared by Donovan that I've
      pulled out to comment on:

      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Donovan & Lillian Mattole <mattole@...>
      To: <mythsoc@egroups.com>
      Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 2:17 PM
      Subject: [mythsoc] Literary vs. SF


      > Dear Locus,
      > When they [SF writers] write a novel like Hyperion or The Book of the New
      Sun, they're aware
      > that they're working in a tradition; in a sense, they're paying their
      dues.
      > Mainstream writers have entirely different motivations for utilizing (or
      > appropriating, if you prefer) genre themes...


      My day job is 100% related to cancer genetics research, and the rest of my
      life is about 50% devoted to speculative fiction (well, I had to figure in
      church and family and trying to pay bills before they're overdue). So I try
      to keep up somewhat on fiction that uses genetics as a basis--no matter how
      it's classified. The main difference I've seen between genre books and
      those labeled mainstream is that the genre authors get the science right!!
      The mainstream bestsellers are generally the worst; it's no wonder the
      public has strange ideas about genetic engineering, cloning, etc. if this is
      what they're reading. (The most ridiculously impossible one I've read,
      entitled "The Third Twin," was a New York Times bestseller and ended up as a
      made-for-TV movie--why am I not surprised?)

      Another difference is that the genre authors use the science as a
      jumping-off point to deal with larger issues. Those labeled mainstream tend
      to have their characters spend the entire book trying to stop the
      science/technology before it destroys the world. And then, of course, the
      method the hero uses to destroy the technology is usually something that
      wouldn't actually work, anyway.


      > ...all too often, intelligent authors like Lucius Sheperd and James Morrow
      are shunted aside by booksellers
      > and publishers alike in favor of the latest Tolkien rip-off/libertarian
      wet
      > dream power fantasy/Star Wars spin-off. (And those are juvenile crap, make
      > no mistake; they not only fulfill the worst expectations of highfalutin'
      > mainstream lit'r'y critics, they exceed them.)
      > Lucius Cook


      I've been glad to see some bookstores putting a lot of the "junk" in a
      separate section (I believe they call it "media related"). Makes it easier
      to find the good stuff.

      --Trudy
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.