Re: [mythsoc] Lewis and "Melmoth the Wanderer'
> The plot of Melmoth is confusing partly because we do notI suppose that my immediate reaction of "spoiler alert!" makes me unworthy.
> learn the premise of the story until the end, where we
> discover that Melmoth had purchased extended life by
> selling his soul to the devil.
> Maturin, like C. S. Lewis, was an Irish Protestant, indeedThen they weren't merely "Irish Protestants," the vast bulk of whom are
> a clergyman in the Church of Ireland.
nonconformists like Presbyterians. Maturin and Lewis were, then, both
adherents of the Established Church of Ireland, a very small body and a much
closer connection. Nicholson goes on to describe Wilde, Yeats, and Stephens
as "Irish Protestants" also, but he doesn't say whether they were Church of
Ireland or nonconfirmists. Insofar as sectarian distinctions are of any
importance, this is.
> It is not an accident that Wilde took the name of ‘Melmoth’And given the close association of the name of Melmoth with Wilde by Lewis's
> when he went into exile in France after imprisonment.
time, some comments on Lewis's opinion of Wilde - and could he separate the
man from the work? - might be relevant here, if they're available.
> I have not found explicit reference to Maturin in Lewis, but IEach sentence here is a separate and distinct plunge into the Sea of Rampant
> believe it is a near certainty that he had read Maturin. Lewis
> read everything. He was especially interested in the fantastic,
> an area he read very widely in. The work of Irish Protestants
> held a deep interest for him, being an Irish Protestant himself
Speculation (or, if you prefer, a jump to the Isle of Conclusions).
> But what really connects Melmoth and Perelandra is the situationWell, that settles it, then. Lewis couldn't possibly have come up with this
> they focus on. In both cases, we are presented with an isolated
> tropical island, where a beautiful but vulnerable young woman is
> besieged by a demonic male who wants to take from her something
> vital—her soul (it is not, as one might expect, sex that draws Melmoth
> and Weston to the woman in question).
on his own. (But in that case, where did Maturin get it?) I agree with
Jason: "he might have simply written a comparative piece and then wondered,
in his conclusion, whether Lewis might have read Melmoth."