Re: [mythsoc] Re: Lawsuit in Texas
- Who actually denied you permission, Janet? And what exactly were you requesting? If you wanted to publish unpublished drafts or notes, then this would be the Tolkien Estate's purview. If you wanted to reprint The Homecoming itself (and the accompanying essay), this would be either Oxford University Press ( < Clarendon Press), the publisher of Essays and Studies by Members of the English Association, in which the work was first published; or -- depending on its acquisition of rights or the arrangements they had to reprint it -- HarperCollins (< George Allen & Unwin) and/or Random House (< Ballantine Books) ... if I have all this right in my head. It quickly becomes very sticky, doesn't it?Of course, any critical commentary you wished to produce would be fine. You could always proceed without reprinting the raw material, but key your commentary to the first edition and/or subsequent reprint editions. And there is, as you know, the audio recording Tolkien made of The Homecoming (with variant readings at several points). Who holds the rights to that? Probably the Tolkien Estate?I once approached the Tolkien Estate about doing a complete variorum edition of The Adventures of Tom Bombadil, but they didn't think this was a financially viable project either. Perhaps they're right. But one of these days, I may try again -- even though the number of rights holders to track down for permissions is a bit dizzying. Many of them are defunct now, I expect.Best,Jason
From: "Croft, Janet B." <jbcroft@...>
To: "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>
Sent: Thu, February 24, 2011 8:44:39 AM
Subject: RE: [mythsoc] Re: Lawsuit in Texas
One denial for me – my proposal to do a critical edition of “Homecoming” was turned down. But mainly because they thought it wouldn’t make any money.
Janet Brennan Croft
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of not_thou
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5:33 PM
Subject: [mythsoc] Re: Lawsuit in Texas
>> sacnoth@... writes:We could start with permission to publish Tolkien's previously unpublished texts. Does John's own book, THE HISTORY OF THE HOBBIT, count in this exercise, Wendell? What about the drafts, notes, and essay in Verlyn Flieger's edition of SMITH OF WOOTTON MAJOR, the drafts in Christina Scull and Wayne Hammond's edition of FARMER GILES OF HAM, and the drafts in Flieger and Douglas Anderson's TOLKIEN ON FAIRY-STORIES? Or do they not count because they were produced by the Tolkien Estate's official publisher? In that case, what about the work produced by the Elvish Linguistic Fellowship, with longer works in PARMA ELDALAMBERON and shorter ones in VINYAR TENGWAR?
>> (4) Don't be misled by the squeaky wheel syndrome: there are many acts of generosity in the granting of permissions that don't get much attention, while the times when they say "NO" tend to get a lot of attention.
> Give me some examples of these many acts of generosity in the granting of permissions. If you can't give me at least as many examples of these acts as there are of them suing people for supposedly violating the copyright and/or trademark, I don't agree that there have been "many acts."
Besides those, off the top of my head I know that hitherto unseen material by Tolkien appears in: THE LORD OF THE RINGS: A READER'S COMPANION and THE J.R.R. TOLKIEN COMPANION AND GUIDE by Scull and Hammond; THE KEYS OF MIDDLE-EARTH by Stuart Lee and Elizabeth Solopova; "The Homecoming of Beorhtnoth: Philology and the Literary Muse" in TOLKIEN STUDIES 4 by Thomas Honegger; "Fate and Free Will" in TOLKIEN STUDIES 6, by Carl Hostetter; Tolkien's "The Story of Kullervo" and two essays on the KALEVALA in TOLKIEN STUDIES 7, ed. by Flieger, and THE BONES OF THE OX, ed. by Jason Fisher (forthcoming).
Additionally, TOLKIEN STUDIES has been allowed to reprint Tolkien's SIR ORFEO, "The Name 'Nodens'", CHAUCER AS A PHILOLOGIST: THE REEVE'S TALE, and "The Clerkes Compleinte".
I'm sure there are more examples. Against this, how many denials can you list? And how many of those do you think should have been permitted?
- Doug,You are excused, sir. I’ve hoped to see Michael Drout’s edition for about ten years now. I imagine Michael has, too.Is there any progress on an edition of J.R.R. Tolkien’s poetry with commentary? Such a thing has been spoken of since Peter Jackson was a sunspot on the far horizon.MikeWhoops! That was meant to be a private message. Sorry about that."Let's hope Tolkien's Beowulf will follow."Dreamer! If there is one action of the Tolkien Estate that I really don't understand, it is blocking Drout's work on this. But have you seen any indication that they have reversed course?Doug
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3480 - Release Date: 03/03/11