Re: [mythsoc] Fairness for Harry Potter critics?
- In a message dated 8/8/00 11:36:37 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> The assumption is that they are assigned because it is trendyThe article by Haynes seems to be saying that Tolkien and Lewis are not being
> to do so, but the assumption is just that--assumed, not proven.
assigned these days. (Is that really true?) I don't recall teachers ever
assigning current bestsellers when I was in school. Yes, perhaps the
teachers do think that the Harry Potter books are that good, but I must say
that I wonder about it.
>I read that the publisher thought that Americans wouldn't buy a book,So publishers may think, narrow-mindedly. I like to think that even
>especially for children, if it had "philosopher's" anything in the title.
>Alas! Probably too close to the truth.
Americans might find a phrase like "philosopher's stone" intriguing rather
than off-putting. I do, and certainly children are attracted to such
things, even if some adults are not. I first read about the Philosopher's
Stone in Flash comics in the 1960s, when DC were throwing all sorts of
education at its young audience without us realizing, and liked the sound
of the words as much as the concept.
Rowling's publishers, both of them I gather, of course also felt that no
boy would read a book by a female author, hence "J.K." rather than
"Joanne". It never bothered me as a young reader who wrote a book as long
as it was good, and there can be few male Harry Potter fans now who don't
know that Rowling is a woman.