Re: Lucy, Galadriel, and Temptation
- Interesting. I have no problem reading Aslan as CSL's concept of Jesus
interacting in a world of talking animals. I don't expect it to be
*my* concept of Jesus interacting in a world of talking animals (!!)
but it's close enough to be recognizable.
I've not read Pullman; I guess anybody who proudly trumpets himself as
the anti-CSL is just not very appealing to me. Don't know if I'll see
the film or not.
-- Lynn --
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, John D Rateliff <sacnoth@...> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Lynn Maudlin wrote:
> > Lewis was trying to make Aslan as much like Jesus as he could imagine
> Well, all I can say is that for me he failed utterly. I can only
> read the books if I 'suspend disbelief' and treat Aslan as a purely
> fictional character, like Manwe or Mana-Yood-Sushai or Koshchei the
> Deathless (i.e., as god, not God).
> I suspect others have the reverse problem with Pullman; they read
> his fantasy as if he were writing a realistic novel about our world,
> and react accordingly.
- Two interesting pieces of news out of the U.K. today, one happy news,
the other sad.
First, a J. K. Rowling manuscript just sold at auction for a
children's charity. They were hoping it'd go for about fifty thousand
pounds; instead it went for two million (over four million dollars).
Second, Terry Pratchett, author of the DIscworld series (among
others), has just revealed that he has early onset Alzheimer's. He's
planning to keep writing while he can.
- On Dec 13, 2007, at 12:25 PM, alexeik@... wrote:
> Are they entirely unjustified in this, though? Not all of Pullman'sIt starts out presenting it as if it's the real world, but since
> story takes place in a fantasy world: parts of it are anchored in
> the primary world as well (or a world so similar to ours that its
> precise identity makes no difference)
fantasy events begin to happen in it it's revealed as just another
fantasy world by that very fact. And it's not the portrayal of
religious figures in Will's world that upsets the people calling for
boycotts of the film or removal of the books from libraries but how
they appear in Lyra's world and the fantasy worlds of the third book.
> . . . the subplot involving Dr. Mary Malone, the ex-nun-turned-I like the idea of the two scenes being inverse of each other; I'd
> scientist who jettisons both her religious vocation and her faith
> in general as a result of tasting marzipan. If this took place
> entirely in a fantasy setting, it could be taken as a clever
> reversal of the "Turkish delight" theme in _LWW_, and appreciated
> on the same level, mythopoeically.
not thought of that before. It struck me as the most trivial possible
reason to lose yr faith; I hope for her sake it was at least good
marzipan, just as I've always hoped it was a pretty good apple.
> Whether one agrees with him or not, it turns his story into aI thought the first book was brilliant. The second was an interesting
> primary-world polemic rather than a mythopoeic statement. This is
> what terminally ruined _The Amber Spyglass_ for me, although I
> really enjoyed most of the two previous books.
attempt to start from a different point and work to the same place;
didn't quite come off, but worth reading. The third was a terrible
hash, both polemic (which was annoying) and mythopoeic (mainly I
think derived from Blake's prophetic books). I've always wondered
what the original version of the third book, which he took back from
the publisher and extensively rewrote, was like.
- On Dec 13, 2007, at 1:15 PM, Lynn Maudlin wrote:
> I've not read Pullman; I guess anybody who proudly trumpets himselfIn that case, I wouldn't recommend your reading the books. You might
> as the anti-CSL is just not very appealing to me. Don't know if
> I'll see the film or not.
still enjoy the movie, which strips out all the parts of the story I
think you'd find objectionable, but it's pretty lightweight as a
result and shd be enjoyed (or not) pretty much just as entertainment.